{"filing":[{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"103192752430804","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2026-03-19T15:00:32.933Z","filers":[{"name":"Kyce Abdallah"}],"date_submission":"2026-03-19T00:50:58.362Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2026-02-12T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","sunshine_end_date":"2026-02-23T05:00:00.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2026-03-19T00:50:58.362Z","text_data":"I am submitting this comment to address the continued allowance of extremely low data speed caps, specifically speeds around 1 Mbps, under programs supported by the Federal Communications Commission.\n\nWhile these speeds may technically qualify as “internet access,” they do not meet any reasonable standard of usability in today’s digital environment. Modern websites, applications, and essential online services are not designed to function at such limited speeds. As a result, users on these plans frequently experience pages failing to load, services timing out, and basic tasks becoming unnecessarily difficult or impossible.\n\nFrom personal experience, this issue goes beyond inconvenience. When using a connection limited to around 1 Mbps, I have had websites fail to load entirely or time out before they finish. Even basic tasks like opening a school-related page or logging into a site can take an excessive amount of time or fail repeatedly. In some cases, it becomes easier to give up than to continue trying. This is not what meaningful access to the internet should look like.\n\nThis is not a minor issue. It is a functional barrier. At 1 Mbps, users may wait long periods for a single page to load, only for the request to fail. This directly impacts the ability to complete schoolwork, apply for jobs, access healthcare portals, and communicate effectively. In practice, this creates a situation where individuals are considered “connected” on paper, but are excluded from meaningful participation in modern digital life.\n\nAllowing this standard to persist effectively establishes a two tiered system of internet access. One is functional for those who can afford it. The other is nominal but inadequate for those relying on subsidized services. This outcome contradicts the broader goal of ensuring equitable access to communication services.\n\nIt is reasonable for carriers to manage network resources. However, there is a clear distinction between responsible network management and setting baseline speeds so low that they undermine the purpose of providing access in the first place.\n\nFor this reason, I urge the Federal Communications Commission to reevaluate and update its minimum standards for usable internet access. A baseline closer to 10 to 25 Mbps would more accurately reflect the requirements of modern websites and services, while still allowing providers to implement reasonable limitations beyond that threshold.\n\nIf internet access is to be considered essential infrastructure, then the definition of access must include the ability to use it effectively, not merely connect to it in theory.\n\nThank you for your consideration.","date_last_modified":"2026-03-19T00:50:58.362Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2026.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10318975827619","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2026-03-18T19:00:32.828Z","filers":[{"name":"Kenneth dean jr lisa dean"}],"date_submission":"2026-03-18T15:15:52.675Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2026-03-18T15:15:52.675Z","text_data":"Hacked","date_last_modified":"2026-03-18T15:15:52.675Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2026.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"BetTJones%20FINAL%20V3%20Mar15%202026-1.pdf.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10316107501738/1","description":""},{"filename":"TJones_A2A_Rule707_Addendum_Mar2026.pdf.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10316107501738/2","description":""},{"filename":"KFCC_Filing_v4_Mar2026.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10316107501738/3","description":""},{"filename":"Tent.pdf.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10316107501738/4","description":""},{"filename":"RMaster URL Reference 2.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10316107501738/5","description":""}],"id_submission":"10316107501738","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2026-03-16T21:00:32.965Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1741198619234,"name":"25-113","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Wireline Competition Bureau Copper Retirement Network Change Notification Filed By BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC d/b/a AT&T Kentucky","created_date":"2025-03-04T19:23:08.000Z","description_display":"Wireline Competition Bureau Copper Retirement Network Change Notification Filed By BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC d/b/a AT&T Kentucky","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1752768924945,"name":"25-233","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Cox Enterprises, Inc. and Charter Communications, Inc.","created_date":"2025-07-17T15:51:49.000Z","description_display":"In the Matter of Cox Enterprises, Inc. and Charter Communications, Inc.","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2025-12-12T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1011900884,"name":"07-243","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Telephone Number Requirements for IP-Enabled Services Providers.","created_date":"2007-11-27T14:53:01.000-05:00","description_display":"Telephone Number Requirements for IP-Enabled Services Providers.","sunshine_end_date":"2025-12-25T05:00:00.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-09-20T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012001830,"name":"10-213","bureau_code":"CG","description":"Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau and Wireless Telecommunications Bureau seek   comment on advanced communication provisions of the Twenty-First Century Communications   and Video Accessibility Act of 2010.","created_date":"2010-10-20T08:45:50.000-04:00","description_display":"Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau and Wireless Telecommunications Bureau seek   comment on advanced communication provisions of the Twenty-First Century Communications   and Video Accessibility Act of 2010.","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012001736,"name":"10-127","bureau_code":"GN","description":"In the Matter of Framework for Broadband Internet Service.","created_date":"2010-06-15T14:17:34.000-04:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Framework for Broadband Internet Service.","bureau_name":"General (Multiple Bureaus)"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":302148,"name":"18-120","bureau_code":"WTB","description":"Transforming the 2.5 GHz Band","created_date":"2018-04-18T14:37:12.600Z","description_display":"Transforming the 2.5 GHz Band","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireless Telecommunications Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1772738125036,"name":"26-52","bureau_code":"CG","description":"Improving Customer Service and Protecting Consumers through Onshoring","created_date":"2026-03-04T14:51:18.000Z","description_display":"Improving Customer Service and Protecting Consumers through Onshoring","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2026-02-12T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1751574642504,"name":"25-208","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Accelerating Network Modernization","created_date":"2025-07-01T19:11:55.000Z","description_display":"Accelerating Network Modernization","sunshine_end_date":"2026-02-19T05:00:00.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":20190228553788,"name":"18-349","bureau_code":"MB","description":"2018 Quadrennial Regulatory Review","created_date":"2018-11-20T20:11:53.000Z","description_display":"2018 Quadrennial Regulatory Review","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Media Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2025-10-22T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301708,"name":"17-59","bureau_code":"CG","description":"In the Matter of Advanced Methods to Target and Eliminate Unlawful Robocalls","created_date":"2017-03-01T16:50:57.796Z","description_display":"In the Matter of Advanced Methods to Target and Eliminate Unlawful Robocalls","sunshine_end_date":"2025-10-29T04:00:00.000Z","bureau_name":"Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-12-04T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012001693,"name":"10-90","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Connect America Fund A National Broadband Plan for Our Future High-Cost  Universal Service Support. .","created_date":"2010-04-21T08:58:30.000-04:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Connect America Fund A National Broadband Plan for Our Future High-Cost  Universal Service Support. .","sunshine_end_date":"2024-12-13T05:00:00.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012001706,"name":"10-101","bureau_code":"WC","description":"States that have certified that they regulate Pole attachments. .","created_date":"2010-05-10T09:36:21.000-04:00","description_display":"States that have certified that they regulate Pole attachments. .","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2026-02-12T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1769625044477,"name":"25-311","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Reforming Legacy Rules for an All-IP Future","created_date":"2025-11-17T15:50:46.000Z","description_display":"Reforming Legacy Rules for an All-IP Future","sunshine_end_date":"2026-02-19T05:00:00.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2026-01-23T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2100-01-31T05:00:00.000Z","id_proceeding":1012001645,"name":"10-51","bureau_code":"CG","description":"In the Matter of Structure and Practices of the Video Relay Service Program. .","created_date":"2010-02-25T09:07:47.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Structure and Practices of the Video Relay Service Program. .","sunshine_end_date":"2026-01-30T05:00:00.000Z","bureau_name":"Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1011200869,"name":"07-52","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Broadband Industry Practices.","created_date":"2007-03-22T10:23:06.000-04:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Broadband Industry Practices.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2025-12-12T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012302685,"name":"13-97","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Numbering Policies for Modern Communications","created_date":"2013-04-16T13:44:23.000-04:00","description_display":"Numbering Policies for Modern Communications","sunshine_end_date":"2025-12-19T05:00:00.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2026-02-12T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","sunshine_end_date":"2026-02-23T05:00:00.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012001825,"name":"10-208","bureau_code":"WT","description":"In the Matter of Universal Service Reform Mobility Fund.","created_date":"2010-10-13T09:36:28.000-04:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Universal Service Reform Mobility Fund.","bureau_name":"Wireless Telecommunications Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1772738124428,"name":"26-54","bureau_code":"SB","description":"Spectrum Abundance for Weird Space Stuff","created_date":"2026-03-04T15:23:51.000Z","description_display":"Spectrum Abundance for Weird Space Stuff","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Space Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2025-10-22T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1759842091407,"name":"25-306","bureau_code":"SB","description":"Space Modernization for the 21st Century","created_date":"2025-10-06T12:59:33.000Z","description_display":"Space Modernization for the 21st Century","sunshine_end_date":"2025-10-29T04:00:00.000Z","bureau_name":"Space Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1696008640579,"name":"23-326","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Wireline Competition Bureau Copper Retirement Network Change Notification Filed By BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC D/B/A AT&T Florida","created_date":"2023-09-29T16:10:40.000Z","description_display":"Wireline Competition Bureau Copper Retirement Network Change Notification Filed By BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC D/B/A AT&T Florida","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1771436493444,"name":"26-39","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Comments Invited On Section 214 Application To Discontinue Domestic Non-Dominant Carrier Telecommunications Services","created_date":"2026-02-18T17:32:03.000Z","description_display":"Comments Invited On Section 214 Application To Discontinue Domestic Non-Dominant Carrier Telecommunications Services","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1738091721701,"name":"25-31","bureau_code":"WC","description":"§63.63 Emergency Discontinuance Application ","created_date":"2025-01-28T18:20:48.000Z","description_display":"§63.63 Emergency Discontinuance Application ","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2026-03-16T17:37:57.890Z","date_last_modified":"2026-03-16T17:37:57.890Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"JONES COHERENCE STANDARD"},{"name":"T Jones"}],"date_submission":"2026-03-16T17:37:57.890Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Filer","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2026.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"Ok.pdf.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10316158007794/1","description":""},{"filename":"Jonescoherence_framework%202.pdf.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10316158007794/2","description":""},{"filename":"Epistemological.pdf.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10316158007794/3","description":""}],"id_submission":"10316158007794","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2026-03-16T21:00:32.965Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1741198619234,"name":"25-113","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Wireline Competition Bureau Copper Retirement Network Change Notification Filed By BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC d/b/a AT&T Kentucky","created_date":"2025-03-04T19:23:08.000Z","description_display":"Wireline Competition Bureau Copper Retirement Network Change Notification Filed By BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC d/b/a AT&T Kentucky","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1738091721701,"name":"25-31","bureau_code":"WC","description":"§63.63 Emergency Discontinuance Application ","created_date":"2025-01-28T18:20:48.000Z","description_display":"§63.63 Emergency Discontinuance Application ","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1771436493444,"name":"26-39","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Comments Invited On Section 214 Application To Discontinue Domestic Non-Dominant Carrier Telecommunications Services","created_date":"2026-02-18T17:32:03.000Z","description_display":"Comments Invited On Section 214 Application To Discontinue Domestic Non-Dominant Carrier Telecommunications Services","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1696008640579,"name":"23-326","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Wireline Competition Bureau Copper Retirement Network Change Notification Filed By BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC D/B/A AT&T Florida","created_date":"2023-09-29T16:10:40.000Z","description_display":"Wireline Competition Bureau Copper Retirement Network Change Notification Filed By BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC D/B/A AT&T Florida","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2025-10-22T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1759842091407,"name":"25-306","bureau_code":"SB","description":"Space Modernization for the 21st Century","created_date":"2025-10-06T12:59:33.000Z","description_display":"Space Modernization for the 21st Century","sunshine_end_date":"2025-10-29T04:00:00.000Z","bureau_name":"Space Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1772738124428,"name":"26-54","bureau_code":"SB","description":"Spectrum Abundance for Weird Space Stuff","created_date":"2026-03-04T15:23:51.000Z","description_display":"Spectrum Abundance for Weird Space Stuff","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Space Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012001825,"name":"10-208","bureau_code":"WT","description":"In the Matter of Universal Service Reform Mobility Fund.","created_date":"2010-10-13T09:36:28.000-04:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Universal Service Reform Mobility Fund.","bureau_name":"Wireless Telecommunications Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1752768924945,"name":"25-233","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Cox Enterprises, Inc. and Charter Communications, Inc.","created_date":"2025-07-17T15:51:49.000Z","description_display":"In the Matter of Cox Enterprises, Inc. and Charter Communications, Inc.","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":302148,"name":"18-120","bureau_code":"WTB","description":"Transforming the 2.5 GHz Band","created_date":"2018-04-18T14:37:12.600Z","description_display":"Transforming the 2.5 GHz Band","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireless Telecommunications Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2025-12-12T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012302685,"name":"13-97","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Numbering Policies for Modern Communications","created_date":"2013-04-16T13:44:23.000-04:00","description_display":"Numbering Policies for Modern Communications","sunshine_end_date":"2025-12-19T05:00:00.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-12-04T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012001693,"name":"10-90","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Connect America Fund A National Broadband Plan for Our Future High-Cost  Universal Service Support. .","created_date":"2010-04-21T08:58:30.000-04:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Connect America Fund A National Broadband Plan for Our Future High-Cost  Universal Service Support. .","sunshine_end_date":"2024-12-13T05:00:00.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012001706,"name":"10-101","bureau_code":"WC","description":"States that have certified that they regulate Pole attachments. .","created_date":"2010-05-10T09:36:21.000-04:00","description_display":"States that have certified that they regulate Pole attachments. .","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2026-02-12T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1769625044477,"name":"25-311","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Reforming Legacy Rules for an All-IP Future","created_date":"2025-11-17T15:50:46.000Z","description_display":"Reforming Legacy Rules for an All-IP Future","sunshine_end_date":"2026-02-19T05:00:00.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2026-02-12T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1751574642504,"name":"25-208","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Accelerating Network Modernization","created_date":"2025-07-01T19:11:55.000Z","description_display":"Accelerating Network Modernization","sunshine_end_date":"2026-02-19T05:00:00.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":20190228553788,"name":"18-349","bureau_code":"MB","description":"2018 Quadrennial Regulatory Review","created_date":"2018-11-20T20:11:53.000Z","description_display":"2018 Quadrennial Regulatory Review","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Media Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1772738125036,"name":"26-52","bureau_code":"CG","description":"Improving Customer Service and Protecting Consumers through Onshoring","created_date":"2026-03-04T14:51:18.000Z","description_display":"Improving Customer Service and Protecting Consumers through Onshoring","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2025-10-22T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301708,"name":"17-59","bureau_code":"CG","description":"In the Matter of Advanced Methods to Target and Eliminate Unlawful Robocalls","created_date":"2017-03-01T16:50:57.796Z","description_display":"In the Matter of Advanced Methods to Target and Eliminate Unlawful Robocalls","sunshine_end_date":"2025-10-29T04:00:00.000Z","bureau_name":"Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012001736,"name":"10-127","bureau_code":"GN","description":"In the Matter of Framework for Broadband Internet Service.","created_date":"2010-06-15T14:17:34.000-04:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Framework for Broadband Internet Service.","bureau_name":"General (Multiple Bureaus)"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-09-20T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012001830,"name":"10-213","bureau_code":"CG","description":"Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau and Wireless Telecommunications Bureau seek   comment on advanced communication provisions of the Twenty-First Century Communications   and Video Accessibility Act of 2010.","created_date":"2010-10-20T08:45:50.000-04:00","description_display":"Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau and Wireless Telecommunications Bureau seek   comment on advanced communication provisions of the Twenty-First Century Communications   and Video Accessibility Act of 2010.","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2026-02-12T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","sunshine_end_date":"2026-02-23T05:00:00.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1011200869,"name":"07-52","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Broadband Industry Practices.","created_date":"2007-03-22T10:23:06.000-04:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Broadband Industry Practices.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2026-03-16T18:01:45.010Z","date_last_modified":"2026-03-16T18:01:45.010Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"Jones coherent standard"},{"name":"T Jones"}],"date_submission":"2026-03-16T18:01:45.010Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Filer","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2026.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1226897630003","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2025-12-29T16:00:14.362Z","filers":[{"name":"Eugenia Santana"}],"date_submission":"2025-12-26T04:58:06.994Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2025-12-26T13:00:00.000Z","text_data":"I believe that we need a return to the 2015 Open Internet Rule. Net neutrality is critical to closing the digital divide and bringing internet access for all.","date_last_modified":"2025-12-26T04:58:06.994Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2025.12","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1091983049292","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2025-09-19T19:00:29.769Z","filers":[{"name":"James Fouts"}],"date_submission":"2025-09-19T15:11:37.929Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2025-09-19T15:11:37.929Z","text_data":"WTH?  I thought the FCC was supposed to be an independent agency.  Not a lap dog to a want-to-be King.\nFirst amendment grants free speech, that does not mean free speech as long it's not offending the want-to-be Kings feelings!  Pull your big boy panties up do your job, and stop being the lap dog that you are!","date_last_modified":"2025-09-19T15:11:37.929Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2025.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"filingsCount":0,"flag_public":"N","short":"ORDER","description":"ORDER","id":68,"type":"ORDER"},"is_staff_upload":0,"documents":[{"filename":"DA-25-613A1.pdf","src":"https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-25-613A1.pdf","description":""},{"filename":"DA-25-613A1_Rcd.pdf","src":"https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-25-613A1_Rcd.pdf","description":""}],"delegated_authority_number":"DA-25-613","id_submission":"107113027530614","bureaus":[{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"}],"lawfirms":[{"name":"FCC"}],"bureau_id":"","date_comment_period":null,"file_number":"","admincomment":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2025-07-11T17:00:00.000Z","id_edocs":412899,"proceedings":[{"name":"25-133","bureau_code":"GN","description":"In Re:  Delete, Delete, Delete","bureau_name":"General (Multiple Bureaus)"},{"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"name":"96-48","bureau_code":"MM","description":"RAINY RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE","bureau_name":"Mass Media Bureau"},{"name":"95-185","bureau_code":"CC","description":"INTERCONNECTION BETWEEN LOCAL EXCHANGE CARRIERS AND COMMERCIAL MOBILE RADIO SERVICE PROVIDERS; EQUAL ACCESS AND INTERCONNECTION OBLIGATIONS PERTAINING TO COMMERCIAL MOBILE RADIO SERVICE PROVIDERS (CC DOCKET NO. 94-54","bureau_name":"Common Carrier Bureau"}],"date_received":"2025-07-11T17:00:00.000Z","reg_flex_analysis":"N","date_last_modified":"2025-11-17T19:54:20.000Z","small_business_impact":"N","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"fcc_record":"","date_reply_comment":null,"express_comment":0,"is_action":1,"exparte_or_late_filed":"N","filers":[{"name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_submission":"2025-07-11T17:00:00.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"trackChanges":[{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2025-07-11T15:45:25.681Z"},{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2025-07-11T16:30:40.204Z"},{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2025-09-25T19:00:43.240Z"},{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2025-09-25T20:30:50.114Z"},{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2025-09-25T21:30:42.607Z"},{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2025-09-29T14:30:42.937Z"},{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2025-09-29T15:30:42.112Z"},{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2025-09-29T16:30:42.861Z"},{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2025-09-29T17:30:43.286Z"},{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2025-09-29T19:30:42.809Z"},{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2025-09-29T20:30:43.196Z"},{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2025-11-17T15:00:43.068Z"}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"_index":"filings.actions.2025"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"107011681523542","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2025-07-01T15:00:29.746Z","filers":[{"name":"Spencer Marcu"}],"date_submission":"2025-07-01T10:54:33.751Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2025-07-01T10:54:33.752Z","text_data":"Help reactivate numbers from sim swap fraud ","date_last_modified":"2025-07-01T10:54:33.752Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2025.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10614694425756","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2025-06-16T15:00:29.723Z","filers":[{"name":"Colleen Craig"}],"date_submission":"2025-06-14T14:50:06.851Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2025-06-16T12:00:00.000Z","text_data":"I specifically support strong net neutrality backed by title 2 oversight of ISP's. ","date_last_modified":"2025-06-14T14:50:06.851Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2025.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10614595304500","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2025-06-16T15:00:29.723Z","filers":[{"name":"Ryan Hanna"}],"date_submission":"2025-06-14T14:54:29.200Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2025-06-16T12:00:00.000Z","text_data":"I specifically support strong net neutrality backed by title 2 oversight of ISP's.","date_last_modified":"2025-06-14T14:54:29.200Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2025.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"103051662605319","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2025-03-05T16:00:49.026Z","filers":[{"name":"GoFccYourself"}],"date_submission":"2025-03-05T02:34:31.526Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2025-03-05T16:00:49.026Z","text_data":"Greedy SoBs….. y’all are just waitin’ to pounce at an opportunity to make a quick buck out of helpless consumers. Did the monopolisation that was the merger of Sprint and T-mobile not give you enough of a kickback?? Access to a free and open internet is a basic human right.","date_last_modified":"2025-03-05T02:34:31.526Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2025.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMPLIANCE FILING","short":"COMPLIANCE","id":128,"abbreviation":"CF"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"HOME.docx","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10204174213164/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"10204174213164","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"0033094590","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2025-02-04T16:00:48.619Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2025-02-04T13:12:02.048Z","date_last_modified":"2025-02-04T13:12:02.048Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"SAW COMM LLC."}],"date_submission":"2025-02-04T13:12:02.048Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Shawn Allen West"}],"_index":"filings.2025.2","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10109969500223","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2025-01-10T16:00:48.503Z","filers":[{"name":"Nyla"}],"date_submission":"2025-01-09T19:56:53.984Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2025-01-10T19:56:00.000Z","trackChanges":[{"changes":{"date_received":"2025-01-10T19:56:00.000Z"},"user":"Zerric.Harper.CTR@fcc.gov","updated":"2025-01-09T20:07:04.575Z"}],"text_data":"I support strong net neutrality and Title II oversight of ISP's.","date_last_modified":"2025-01-09T20:07:04.875Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2025.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1029228123789","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2024-10-30T15:00:05.027Z","filers":[{"name":"Kevin Paul"}],"date_submission":"2024-10-29T19:08:52.725Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-10-29T19:08:52.726Z","text_data":"Despite what you've laid out in your Restoring Internet Freedom order, I strongly disagree with the changes proposed in said order, and will continue to support strong net neutrality backed by Title II oversight of ISPs.","date_last_modified":"2024-10-29T19:08:52.726Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"FCC EB PDPTF Letter Ex Parte-24-10-19.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10191446900903/1","description":""},{"filename":"FCC EB PDPTF Letter-24-10-17.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10191446900903/2","description":""}],"id_submission":"10191446900903","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-10-21T15:00:04.702Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2018-03-15T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":302092,"name":"18-64","bureau_code":"PSHSB","description":"Location-Based Routing for Wireless 911 Calls","created_date":"2018-02-28T19:20:09.553Z","description_display":"Location-Based Routing for Wireless 911 Calls","sunshine_end_date":"2018-03-23T03:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Public Safety & Homeland Security Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":302127,"name":"18-99","bureau_code":"PSHSB","description":"Network Reliability Best Practices","created_date":"2018-04-03T17:41:37.630Z","description_display":"Network Reliability Best Practices","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Public Safety & Homeland Security Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":2021122005851,"name":"21-479","bureau_code":"PSHSB","description":"Facilitating Implementation of Next Generation 911 Services (NG911)","created_date":"2021-12-15T18:35:12.000Z","description_display":"Facilitating Implementation of Next Generation 911 Services (NG911)","sunshine_end_date":"2024-07-22T14:12:00.000Z","bureau_name":"Public Safety & Homeland Security Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1691679638860,"name":"23-239","bureau_code":"PSHSB","description":"Cybersecurity Labeling for Internet of Things","created_date":"2023-07-17T17:08:57.000Z","description_display":"Cybersecurity Labeling for Internet of Things","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Public Safety & Homeland Security Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":20190228553775,"name":"18-336","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Implementation of the National Suicide Hotline Improvement Act of 2018","created_date":"2018-11-07T18:28:54.000Z","description_display":"Implementation of the National Suicide Hotline Improvement Act of 2018","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":2021093061991,"name":"21-341","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Protecting Consumers from SIM Swap and Port-Out Fraud","created_date":"2021-08-26T15:25:26.000Z","description_display":"Protecting Consumers from SIM Swap and Port-Out Fraud","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":20211118032741,"name":"21-450","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Affordable Connectivity Program","created_date":"2021-11-18T16:54:13.000Z","description_display":"Affordable Connectivity Program","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1674485438347,"name":"22-21","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Data Breach Reporting Requirements","created_date":"2022-01-12T15:58:04.000Z","description_display":"Data Breach Reporting Requirements","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1656001941786,"name":"22-238","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Supporting Survivors of Domestic and Sexual Violence","created_date":"2022-06-22T14:17:02.000Z","description_display":"Supporting Survivors of Domestic and Sexual Violence","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":"2024-05-06T04:00:00.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-10-21T11:36:25.810Z","date_last_modified":"2024-10-19T11:36:25.810Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"Electronic Privacy Information Center"}],"date_submission":"2024-10-19T11:36:25.809Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"XX","name":"Others","edocs_bureau_code":"NA","id":80},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"EB","name":"Enforcement Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"EB","id":170},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"GN","name":"General (Multiple Bureaus)","edocs_bureau_code":"GEN","id":85}],"entity":"Law Firm","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT","short":"REQUEST","id":96,"abbreviation":"RQ"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"Koolaburra by UGG Victoria Short Women's Winter Boots.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/101716023667/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"101716023667","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-10-18T15:00:04.742Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-10-17T22:42:48.462Z","date_last_modified":"2024-10-17T22:42:48.462Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"Latasha Williamson"}],"date_submission":"2024-10-17T22:42:48.462Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Filer","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"100522770962","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2024-10-07T15:00:04.795Z","filers":[{"name":"Latasha Williamson"},{"name":"Epic games"},{"name":"at&t"}],"date_submission":"2024-10-05T17:13:51.960Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-10-07T17:13:51.960Z","text_data":".","date_last_modified":"2024-10-05T17:13:51.960Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"2024.9.14 As-final UST Open Internet PRA comments.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10916250839064/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"10916250839064","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-09-17T15:00:05.154Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":"2024-05-06T04:00:00.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-09-16T21:15:47.151Z","date_last_modified":"2024-09-16T21:15:47.151Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"USTelecom-The Broadband Association"}],"date_submission":"2024-09-16T21:15:47.151Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Diana Eisner"}],"_index":"filings.2024.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"240916 CTIA Transparency Rule 60-Day Comment.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1091600251107/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"1091600251107","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-09-17T15:00:05.154Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":"2024-05-06T04:00:00.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-09-16T22:28:24.641Z","date_last_modified":"2024-09-16T22:28:24.641Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"CTIA"}],"date_submission":"2024-09-16T22:28:24.641Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Filer","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10829935814647","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2024-08-29T15:00:05.056Z","filers":[{"name":"Justin Westling"}],"date_submission":"2024-08-29T07:14:18.382Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-08-29T07:14:18.382Z","text_data":"I support strong net neutrality backed by title 2 oversight of ISPs. ISPs’ broadband offerings are telecommunications according to the statutory definition.","date_last_modified":"2024-08-29T07:14:18.382Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"108281491500479","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2024-08-28T21:00:05.269Z","filers":[{"name":"Pat sroka"}],"date_submission":"2024-08-28T18:01:37.104Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-08-28T18:01:37.104Z","text_data":"I support net neutrality per title 2 over site of ifp.\nThey won’t control themselves. Can’t be trusted","date_last_modified":"2024-08-28T18:01:37.104Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"108270178920725","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2024-08-28T15:00:04.669Z","filers":[{"name":"peter busteed"}],"date_submission":"2024-08-27T23:36:47.057Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-08-27T23:36:47.057Z","text_data":"I specifically support strong Net Nutrality backed by title 2 oversight of internet service providers.","date_last_modified":"2024-08-27T23:36:47.057Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"Henningsen consent decree.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/108272900315301/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"108272900315301","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[{"name":"Hopium Law Firm"}],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-08-27T15:00:05.015Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-08-27T00:41:38.991Z","date_last_modified":"2024-08-27T00:41:38.991Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"HasanAbi"}],"date_submission":"2024-08-27T00:41:38.991Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Law Firm","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"108012124518927","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2024-08-01T17:00:04.877Z","filers":[{"name":"Christopher Richardson"},{"name":"Brittany Lafaye Thomas"}],"date_submission":"2024-08-01T14:08:30.173Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-08-01T14:08:30.173Z","text_data":"Express comments ","date_last_modified":"2024-08-01T14:08:30.173Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"LETTER","short":"LETTER","id":29,"abbreviation":"LT"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"CMTI Response to FCC (July 24, 2024).pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10726655608183/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"10726655608183","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-07-26T15:00:05.137Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":"2024-05-06T04:00:00.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-07-26T10:14:51.079Z","date_last_modified":"2024-07-26T10:14:51.079Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"China Mobile Technology (USA) Inc."}],"date_submission":"2024-07-26T10:14:51.079Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Filer","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"LETTER","short":"LETTER","id":29,"abbreviation":"LT"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"CMII US1 Certification Letter (Final 23July2024).pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10723676224804/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"10723676224804","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[{"name":"HWG LLP"}],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-07-24T15:00:04.930Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":"2024-05-06T04:00:00.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-07-23T20:54:17.089Z","date_last_modified":"2024-07-23T20:54:17.089Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"China Mobile International Infrastructure (US1) Inc."}],"date_submission":"2024-07-23T20:54:17.089Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Law Firm","authors":[{"name":"Kent D. Bressie"}],"_index":"filings.2024.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"LETTER","short":"LETTER","id":29,"abbreviation":"LT"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"CMIUSA Certification Letter (Final 23July2024).pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107230194709208/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"107230194709208","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[{"name":"HWG LLP"}],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-07-24T15:00:04.930Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":"2024-05-06T04:00:00.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-07-23T20:47:09.026Z","date_last_modified":"2024-07-23T20:47:09.026Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"China Mobile International (USA) Inc."}],"date_submission":"2024-07-23T20:47:09.026Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Law Firm","authors":[{"name":"Kent D. Bressie"}],"_index":"filings.2024.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"LETTER","short":"LETTER","id":29,"abbreviation":"LT"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"CMI Certification Letter (Final 23July2024).pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10723151335087/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"10723151335087","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[{"name":"HWG LLP"}],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-07-24T15:00:04.930Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":"2024-05-06T04:00:00.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-07-23T20:50:14.144Z","date_last_modified":"2024-07-23T20:50:14.144Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"China Mobile International Limited"}],"date_submission":"2024-07-23T20:50:14.144Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Law Firm","authors":[{"name":"Kent D. Bressie"}],"_index":"filings.2024.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1061672326511","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2024-06-17T15:00:04.980Z","filers":[{"name":"Ramon Ortiz"}],"date_submission":"2024-06-16T20:33:32.973Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-06-17T20:33:32.973Z","text_data":"privacy policy or terms and conditions changes all information posted online","date_last_modified":"2024-06-16T20:33:32.973Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"filingsCount":0,"flag_public":"N","short":"ORDER","description":"ORDER","id":68,"type":"ORDER"},"is_staff_upload":0,"documents":[{"filename":"DA-24-544A1.pdf","src":"https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-24-544A1.pdf","description":""},{"filename":"DA-24-544A1_Rcd.pdf","src":"https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-24-544A1_Rcd.pdf","description":""}],"delegated_authority_number":"DA-24-544","id_submission":"10607310518622","bureaus":[{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"}],"lawfirms":[{"name":"FCC"}],"bureau_id":"","date_comment_period":null,"file_number":"","admincomment":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-06-07T17:00:00.000Z","id_edocs":403080,"proceedings":[{"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-06-07T17:00:00.000Z","reg_flex_analysis":"N","date_last_modified":"2025-02-03T18:38:03.000Z","small_business_impact":"N","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"fcc_record":"","date_reply_comment":null,"express_comment":0,"is_action":1,"exparte_or_late_filed":"N","filers":[{"name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_submission":"2024-06-07T17:00:00.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"trackChanges":[{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2024-06-07T19:45:23.537Z"},{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2024-06-07T20:15:24.301Z"},{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2025-01-22T18:30:44.687Z"},{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2025-01-22T21:00:44.528Z"},{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2025-01-29T19:30:45.638Z"},{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2025-02-03T14:00:46.120Z"}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"_index":"filings.actions.2024"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"PETITION","short":"PETITION","id":121,"abbreviation":"PT"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"WC 23-320 - Petition for Stay.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1053179708951/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"1053179708951","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[{"name":"Sullivan & Cromwell LLP"}],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-05-31T21:00:04.900Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":"2024-05-06T04:00:00.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-05-31T18:10:58.010Z","date_last_modified":"2024-05-31T18:10:58.010Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"USTelecom - The Broadband Association"},{"name":"NCTA - The Internet & Television Association"},{"name":"CTIA - The Wireless Association"},{"name":"WISPA - Broadband Without Boundaries"},{"name":"ACA Connects - America's Communications Association"},{"name":"Florida Internet & Television Association"},{"name":"MCTA - The Missouri Internet & Television Association"},{"name":"Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association"},{"name":"Ohio Telecom Association"},{"name":"Texas Cable Association"}],"date_submission":"2024-05-31T18:10:58.010Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Law Firm","authors":[{"name":"Jeffrey B. Wall"}],"_index":"filings.2024.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"filingsCount":0,"flag_public":"N","short":"PUB NOTICE","description":"PUBLIC NOTICE","id":88,"type":"PN"},"is_staff_upload":0,"documents":[{"filename":"DA-24-490A1.pdf","src":"https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-24-490A1.pdf","description":""},{"filename":"DA-24-490A1_Rcd.pdf","src":"https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-24-490A1_Rcd.pdf","description":""}],"delegated_authority_number":"DA-24-490","id_submission":"105231690028905","bureaus":[{"code":"GC","name":"Office of General Counsel","edocs_bureau_code":"OGC"}],"lawfirms":[{"name":"FCC"}],"bureau_id":"","date_comment_period":null,"file_number":"","admincomment":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-05-23T17:00:00.000Z","id_edocs":402778,"proceedings":[{"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-05-23T17:00:00.000Z","reg_flex_analysis":"N","date_last_modified":"2025-02-03T18:38:00.000Z","small_business_impact":"N","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"fcc_record":"","date_reply_comment":null,"express_comment":0,"is_action":1,"exparte_or_late_filed":"N","filers":[{"name":"Office of General Counsel"}],"date_submission":"2024-05-23T17:00:00.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"trackChanges":[{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2024-05-23T19:45:23.415Z"},{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2024-05-24T16:45:24.099Z"},{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2025-01-21T15:00:38.347Z"},{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2025-01-22T18:30:46.035Z"},{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2025-01-22T21:00:46.160Z"},{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2025-01-29T19:30:47.578Z"},{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2025-02-03T14:00:47.368Z"}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Office of General Counsel"}],"_index":"filings.actions.2024"},{"submissiontype":{"filingsCount":0,"flag_public":"Y","short":"OTHER","description":"OTHER","id":117,"type":"OT"},"is_staff_upload":0,"documents":[{"filename":"DOC-402667A1.pdf","src":"https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-402667A1.pdf","description":""}],"delegated_authority_number":"","id_submission":"105200395304563","bureaus":[{"code":"OMD","name":"Office of Managing Director","edocs_bureau_code":"OMD"}],"lawfirms":[{"name":"FCC"}],"bureau_id":"","date_comment_period":null,"file_number":"","admincomment":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-05-20T17:00:00.000Z","id_edocs":402667,"proceedings":[{"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-05-20T17:00:00.000Z","reg_flex_analysis":"N","date_last_modified":"2024-05-20T21:12:54.000Z","small_business_impact":"N","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"fcc_record":"","date_reply_comment":null,"express_comment":0,"is_action":1,"exparte_or_late_filed":"N","filers":[{"name":"Office of Managing Director"}],"date_submission":"2024-05-20T17:00:00.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"trackChanges":[{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2024-05-20T16:15:23.574Z"}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Office of Managing Director"}],"_index":"filings.actions.2024"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"OTHER","short":"OTHER","id":117,"abbreviation":"OT"},"is_staff_upload":1,"delegated_authority_number":"","documents":[{"filename":"[EXTERNAL]_ Net Neutrality filing public_Redacted.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/105100721426670/1","description":""},{"filename":"ATTACHMENT.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/105100721426670/2","description":""}],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"105100721426670","id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"date_released":null,"file_number":"","date_accepted":null,"report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-05-10T15:00:04.400Z","date_received":"2024-04-25T10:59:00.000Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2024-04-19T04:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_last_modified":"2024-05-13T12:14:31.615Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Sunshine","id":"40"},"fcc_record":"","date_filed":"2024-04-25T10:59:00.000Z","express_comment":0,"is_action":0,"date_submission":"2024-05-10T11:10:18.003Z","filers":[{"name":"Advocacy"},{"name":"Common Cause"},{"name":"Daily Kos"},{"name":"Friends of the Earth Action"},{"name":"RootsAction"}],"filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"trackChanges":[{"changes":{"documents":[{"filename":"[EXTERNAL]_ Net Neutrality filing public_Redacted.pdf","src":"https://files.fcc.gov/ecfs/download/656b26e8-6e74-4f02-8cf7-37a768d2e8de?orig=true&pk=cb77b2ec-1a58-dbc6-139b-ad192cfd5d9b","description":""},{"filename":"ATTACHMENT.pdf","src":"https://files.fcc.gov/ecfs/download/eeb30465-bbea-4fec-bfa4-f641f005671f?orig=true&pk=cb77b2ec-1a58-dbc6-139b-ad192cfd5d9b","description":""}],"filers":[{"name":"Advocacy"},{"name":"Common Cause"},{"name":"Daily Kos"},{"name":"Friends of the Earth Action"},{"name":"RootsAction"}],"date_received":"2024-04-25T10:59:00.000Z","viewingstatus":{"description":"Sunshine","id":"40"}},"user":"Juan.Salazar@fcc.gov","updated":"2024-05-13T12:14:31.103Z"}],"entity":"","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"filingsCount":0,"flag_public":"N","short":"ORDER","description":"ORDER","id":68,"type":"OR"},"is_staff_upload":0,"documents":[{"filename":"FCC-24-52A6.pdf","src":"https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-24-52A6.pdf","description":"Gomez Statement"},{"filename":"FCC-24-52A4.pdf","src":"https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-24-52A4.pdf","description":"Starks Statement"},{"filename":"FCC-24-52A3.pdf","src":"https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-24-52A3.pdf","description":"Carr Statement"},{"filename":"FCC-24-52A2.pdf","src":"https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-24-52A2.pdf","description":"Rosenworcel Statement"},{"filename":"FCC-24-52A5.pdf","src":"https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-24-52A5.pdf","description":"Simington Statement"},{"filename":"FCC-24-52A1.pdf","src":"https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-24-52A1.pdf","description":""},{"filename":"FCC-24-52A1_Rcd.pdf","src":"https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-24-52A1_Rcd.pdf","description":""}],"delegated_authority_number":"FCC-24-52","id_submission":"10507450924460","bureaus":[{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"}],"lawfirms":[{"name":"FCC"}],"bureau_id":"","date_comment_period":null,"file_number":"","admincomment":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-05-07T17:00:00.000Z","id_edocs":402385,"proceedings":[{"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-05-07T17:00:00.000Z","reg_flex_analysis":"N","date_last_modified":"2025-01-14T18:16:30.000Z","small_business_impact":"N","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"fcc_record":"","date_reply_comment":null,"express_comment":0,"is_action":1,"exparte_or_late_filed":"N","filers":[{"name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_submission":"2024-05-07T17:00:00.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"trackChanges":[{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2024-05-07T18:15:24.097Z"},{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2024-05-07T19:15:23.388Z"},{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2024-05-07T22:15:24.717Z"},{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2024-05-07T22:45:23.721Z"},{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2024-05-08T16:45:24.113Z"},{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2025-01-08T19:00:43.183Z"},{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2025-01-08T20:00:43.095Z"},{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2025-01-08T21:30:42.404Z"},{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2025-01-14T13:30:41.464Z"}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"_index":"filings.actions.2024"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"104270924428977","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Sunshine","id":"40"},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2024-04-29T15:00:05.471Z","filers":[{"name":"Tanya Christopher"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-27T17:22:08.191Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-29T17:22:08.192Z","text_data":"Need information ","date_last_modified":"2024-04-27T17:22:08.191Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"2024-04-17 Steffen.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10420173842948/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"10420173842948","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-22T15:00:04.493Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301793,"name":"17-142","bureau_code":"GN","description":"Improving Competitive Broadband Access to Multiple Tenant Environments","created_date":"2017-05-31T18:38:43.606Z","description_display":"Improving Competitive Broadband Access to Multiple Tenant Environments","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"General (Multiple Bureaus)"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":2019071194432,"name":"19-195","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Establishing the Digital Opportunity Data Collection","created_date":"2019-07-10T18:52:32.000Z","description_display":"Establishing the Digital Opportunity Data Collection","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-22T02:28:21.661Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-20T02:28:21.660Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Sunshine","id":"40"},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"Laurence Brett (\"Brett\") Glass, d/b/a LARIAT"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-20T02:28:21.660Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"AG","name":"Office of Commissioner Anna Gomez","edocs_bureau_code":"OCAG","id":9009}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"WTA Ex Parte H Steffen Open Internet April 2024.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10419306499640/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"10419306499640","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-19T19:00:04.929Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-19T15:35:42.283Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-19T15:35:42.283Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Sunshine","id":"40"},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"WTA - Advocates for Rural Broadband"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-19T15:35:42.283Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"AG","name":"Office of Commissioner Anna Gomez","edocs_bureau_code":"OCAG","id":9009}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Gerard J. Duffy"}],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"240419 - ACA Connects Title II Faulb-Steffen Ex Parte.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10419002327699/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"10419002327699","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-19T17:00:04.941Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-19T14:51:31.050Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-19T14:51:31.050Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Sunshine","id":"40"},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"ACA Connects - America's Communications Association"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-19T14:51:31.050Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"AG","name":"Office of Commissioner Anna Gomez","edocs_bureau_code":"OCAG","id":9009},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"GS","name":"Office of Commissioner Geoffrey Starks","edocs_bureau_code":"OCGS","id":220}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Brian Hurley"}],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"2024 04 18 USTelecom Ex Parte.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1041839378199/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"1041839378199","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[{"name":"Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C."}],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-19T15:00:04.579Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-18T20:41:24.899Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-18T20:41:24.899Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Sunshine","id":"40"},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"USTelecom - The Broadband Association"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-18T20:41:24.898Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"OSEC","name":"Office of the Secretary","edocs_bureau_code":"","id":103}],"entity":"Law Firm","authors":[{"name":"Scott H. Angstreich"}],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"NCTA NN ex parte (4-18-24).pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10418242231200/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"10418242231200","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[{"name":"Latham & Watkins LLP"}],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-19T15:00:04.579Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-18T21:21:03.828Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-18T21:21:03.828Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Sunshine","id":"40"},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"NCTA - The Internet & Television Association"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-18T21:21:03.828Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"AG","name":"Office of Commissioner Anna Gomez","edocs_bureau_code":"OCAG","id":9009}],"entity":"Law Firm","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"LETTER","short":"LETTER","id":29,"abbreviation":"LT"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"NCTA Letter re Aron-Wildman Report (4-18-2024).pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1041867290096/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"1041867290096","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[{"name":"Latham & Watkins LLP"}],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-19T15:00:04.579Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-18T21:33:59.280Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-18T21:33:59.280Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Sunshine","id":"40"},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"NCTA - The Internet & Television Association"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-18T21:33:59.280Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Law Firm","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"LETTER","short":"LETTER","id":29,"abbreviation":"LT"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"NCTA-UST-CTIA Letter re Alleged ISP Conduct (4-18-2024).pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1041803982452/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"1041803982452","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-19T15:00:04.579Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-18T21:28:24.774Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-18T21:28:24.774Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Sunshine","id":"40"},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"NCTA - The Internet & Television Association"},{"name":"USTelecom - The Broadband Association"},{"name":"CTIA - The Wireless Association"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-18T21:28:24.774Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Filer","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"Ex Parte Letter re OI ex partes 041824 FINAL.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/104182007711973/1","description":""},{"filename":"Att B - Ex Parte 041724.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/104182007711973/2","description":""},{"filename":"Att C - Ex Parte 041724.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/104182007711973/3","description":""}],"id_submission":"104182007711973","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-19T15:00:04.579Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-18T19:33:39.968Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-18T19:33:39.968Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Sunshine","id":"40"},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"NTCA-The Rural Broadband Association"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-18T19:33:39.967Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"JR","name":"Office of Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel","edocs_bureau_code":"OCHJR","id":185}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Michael R. Romano"}],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"240418 CTIA Ex Parte Notification Letter - WC Docket 23-320.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10418953207469/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"10418953207469","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-19T15:00:04.579Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":2020020387421,"name":"20-32","bureau_code":"GN","description":"Establishing a 5G Fund for Rural America","created_date":"2020-02-03T14:46:22.000Z","description_display":"Establishing a 5G Fund for Rural America","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"General (Multiple Bureaus)"}],"date_received":"2024-04-18T22:30:11.295Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-18T22:30:11.295Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Sunshine","id":"40"},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"CTIA"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-18T22:30:11.295Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"BC","name":"Office of Commissioner Brendan Carr","edocs_bureau_code":"OCBC","id":200},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"NS","name":"Office of Commissioner Nathan Simington","edocs_bureau_code":"OCNS","id":190}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"2024 04 18 USTelecom Ex Parte.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10418068428836/1","description":""},{"filename":"2024 04 18 Recon Analytics Paper.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10418068428836/2","description":""}],"id_submission":"10418068428836","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[{"name":"Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C."}],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-19T15:00:04.579Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-18T20:14:44.418Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-18T20:14:44.418Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Sunshine","id":"40"},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"USTelecom - The Broadband Association"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-18T20:14:44.418Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"OSEC","name":"Office of the Secretary","edocs_bureau_code":"","id":103}],"entity":"Law Firm","authors":[{"name":"Scott H. Angstreich"}],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"WISPA Faulb NN ex parte.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10418091010063/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"10418091010063","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-19T15:00:04.579Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-18T20:52:55.218Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-18T20:52:55.218Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Sunshine","id":"40"},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"WISPA – The Association for Broadband Without Boundaries"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-18T20:52:55.218Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"GS","name":"Office of Commissioner Geoffrey Starks","edocs_bureau_code":"OCGS","id":220}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"041824 23-320 17-108 17-287 11-42 NCTA Ex Parte on NN Attaching Compass Lexecon.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10418071401582/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"10418071401582","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-19T15:00:04.579Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-18T21:20:52.755Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-18T21:20:52.755Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Sunshine","id":"40"},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"NCTA - The Internet & Television Association"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-18T21:20:52.755Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"OSEC","name":"Office of the Secretary","edocs_bureau_code":"","id":103}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"240418 CTIA Letter - WC 23-320 et al.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1041952994734/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"1041952994734","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-19T15:00:04.579Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-19T01:24:03.151Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-19T01:24:03.151Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Sunshine","id":"40"},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"CTIA"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-19T01:24:03.151Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB","id":145}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1041820831339","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2024-04-18T19:00:05.051Z","filers":[{"name":"James A Bachman"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-18T15:23:43.054Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-18T15:23:43.055Z","text_data":"Net neutrality is the principle that all internet service providers treat all traffic coming through their networks without discrimination. The effect of this principle is that customers decide for themselves how they’d like to experience the Internet. The Commission’s rules as currently written leave open the door for positive discrimination of content, that is, the supposed creation of fast lanes where some content is sped up relative to others. This isn’t how the internet works, but in any case, whether an ISP is speeding up or slowing down content, the end result is the same: the ISP picks the winners and losers on the internet. As such the Commission must create bright line rules against all forms of discrimination, speeding up or slowing down, against apps or classes of apps on general traffic in the internet.\n\nFurther, while the Commission currently finds state net neutrality rules, like California’s, to not be preempted because they “generally track” its own rules, it makes it easy to rule otherwise at a future date. But just as we received net neutrality in 2015 only to have it taken away in 2017, there is no guarantee that the Commission will continue to find state net neutrality laws passed post-2017 to be consistent with the rules. To safeguard net neutrality, the Commission must find that California’s law is wholly consistent with its rules and that preemption is taken as a floor, not a ceiling so that states can go above and beyond the federal standard without it being considered inconsistent with the federal rule.","date_last_modified":"2024-04-18T15:23:43.055Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"WISPA_Cuttner_Net_Neutrality__Ex_Parte_Letter.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1041721296725/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"1041721296725","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-18T15:00:04.967Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-17T20:42:32.556Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-17T20:42:32.556Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"WISPA – The Association for Broadband Without Boundaries"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-17T20:42:32.556Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"JR","name":"Office of Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel","edocs_bureau_code":"OCHJR","id":185}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Louis Peraertz"}],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"VPS net neutr ex April 17 2024 HS.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1041757477154/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"1041757477154","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-18T15:00:04.967Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-17T21:56:45.898Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-17T21:56:45.898Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"Vantage Point Solutions"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-17T21:56:45.898Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"AG","name":"Office of Commissioner Anna Gomez","edocs_bureau_code":"OCAG","id":9009}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Jeffry H. Smith"}],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"WISPA_Garry-Sura_Net_Neutrality_Ex_Parte_Letter.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10417413900794/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"10417413900794","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-18T15:00:04.967Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-17T20:38:19.408Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-17T20:38:19.408Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"WISPA – The Association for Broadband Without Boundaries"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-17T20:38:19.408Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"BC","name":"Office of Commissioner Brendan Carr","edocs_bureau_code":"OCBC","id":200}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Louis Peraertz"}],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"2024-04-17 FCC Ex Parte from Internet Society & Global Cyber Alliance.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/104170760417493/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"104170760417493","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-18T15:00:04.967Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-17T20:32:54.589Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-17T20:32:54.589Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"Internet Society"},{"name":"Global Cyber Alliance"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-17T20:32:54.588Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"JR","name":"Office of Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel","edocs_bureau_code":"OCHJR","id":185},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"AG","name":"Office of Commissioner Anna Gomez","edocs_bureau_code":"OCAG","id":9009},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"BC","name":"Office of Commissioner Brendan Carr","edocs_bureau_code":"OCBC","id":200},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"GS","name":"Office of Commissioner Geoffrey Starks","edocs_bureau_code":"OCGS","id":220},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"NS","name":"Office of Commissioner Nathan Simington","edocs_bureau_code":"OCNS","id":190},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"PSHSB","name":"Public Safety & Homeland Security Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"PSHSB","id":155}],"entity":"Author","authors":[{"name":"John Morris"},{"name":"Ryan Polk"},{"name":"Leslie Daigle"}],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"2024 04 17 Verizon Title II ex parte.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1041732898785/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"1041732898785","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-18T15:00:04.967Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-17T19:42:52.803Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-17T19:42:52.803Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"Verizon"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-17T19:42:52.803Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"AG","name":"Office of Commissioner Anna Gomez","edocs_bureau_code":"OCAG","id":9009},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"GS","name":"Office of Commissioner Geoffrey Starks","edocs_bureau_code":"OCGS","id":220}],"entity":"Author","authors":[{"name":"William H. Johnson"}],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"Ex Parte Letter re OI ex partes 041724 FINAL.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10417954421155/1","description":""},{"filename":"Att B - Ex Parte 041724.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10417954421155/2","description":""},{"filename":"Att C - Ex Parte 041724.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10417954421155/3","description":""}],"id_submission":"10417954421155","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-18T15:00:04.967Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-17T19:44:58.083Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-17T19:44:58.083Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"NTCA-The Rural Broadband Association"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-17T19:44:58.083Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"AG","name":"Office of Commissioner Anna Gomez","edocs_bureau_code":"OCAG","id":9009},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"GS","name":"Office of Commissioner Geoffrey Starks","edocs_bureau_code":"OCGS","id":220}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Michael R. Romano"}],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"ATT April 17 2024 T2 Ex parte Gomez Starks Simington Office FINAL PDF.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10417011066290/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"10417011066290","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-17T21:00:04.673Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-17T17:18:15.288Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-17T17:18:15.288Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"AT&T Services, Inc."}],"date_submission":"2024-04-17T17:18:15.288Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"AG","name":"Office of Commissioner Anna Gomez","edocs_bureau_code":"OCAG","id":9009},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"GS","name":"Office of Commissioner Geoffrey Starks","edocs_bureau_code":"OCGS","id":220},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"NS","name":"Office of Commissioner Nathan Simington","edocs_bureau_code":"OCNS","id":190}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Matt Nodine"}],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10417053111401","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2024-04-17T19:00:04.611Z","filers":[{"name":"Julian Garner"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-17T15:38:26.123Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-17T15:38:26.123Z","text_data":"The FCC should consider amending the Open Order to Reconsider Net Neutrality, in the Bill, it should specify that Internet service providers shall not be allowed to implement so-called \"Fast Lanes\" in Internet service plans that favor either specific services or types of services. These plans prevent competition in these Internet markets and favor platforms that already dominate the market making it practically impossible for new platforms to compete.","date_last_modified":"2024-04-17T15:38:26.123Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1041681666744","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2024-04-17T15:00:04.709Z","filers":[{"name":"Paul Mirel"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-16T23:45:34.207Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-16T23:45:34.207Z","text_data":"Dear FCC, \n\nNet Neutrality must be truly neutral. The Commission’s rules as currently written leave open the door for positive discrimination of content, that is, the supposed creation of fast lanes where some content is sped up relative to others. This loophole will allow the ISPs to pick the winners and losers on the internet. As such the Commission must create bright line rules against all forms of discrimination, speeding up or slowing down, against apps or classes of apps on general traffic in the internet.\n\nThank you for hearing my voice, and please strongly protect Net Neutrality. \n","date_last_modified":"2024-04-16T23:45:34.207Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"AICC.NN Ex Parte.4-16-24.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/104170390604377/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"104170390604377","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-17T15:00:04.709Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-17T00:43:50.173Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-17T00:43:50.173Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"Alarm Industry Communications Committee"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-17T00:43:50.173Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"GN","name":"General (Multiple Bureaus)","edocs_bureau_code":"GEN","id":85}],"entity":"Author","authors":[{"name":"Sascha Kylau"}],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"230416 - ACA Connects Title II Nagarajan Ex Parte.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10416230723214/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"10416230723214","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-17T15:00:04.709Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-16T23:47:16.435Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-16T23:47:16.435Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"ACA Connects - America's Communications Association"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-16T23:47:16.435Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"JR","name":"Office of Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel","edocs_bureau_code":"OCHJR","id":185}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Brian Hurley"}],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"2024 04 16 USTelecom Ex Parte.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1041685894135/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"1041685894135","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[{"name":"Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C."}],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-17T15:00:04.709Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-16T19:53:58.842Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-16T19:53:58.842Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"USTelecom - The Broadband Association"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-16T19:53:58.842Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"OSEC","name":"Office of the Secretary","edocs_bureau_code":"","id":103}],"entity":"Law Firm","authors":[{"name":"Scott H. Angstreich"}],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"240416 CTIA Ex Parte Notification Letter - WC 23-320.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1041772185375/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"1041772185375","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-17T15:00:04.709Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-17T00:43:29.562Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-17T00:43:29.562Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"CTIA"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-17T00:43:29.562Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"JR","name":"Office of Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel","edocs_bureau_code":"OCHJR","id":185},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"BC","name":"Office of Commissioner Brendan Carr","edocs_bureau_code":"OCBC","id":200},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"GS","name":"Office of Commissioner Geoffrey Starks","edocs_bureau_code":"OCGS","id":220},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"NS","name":"Office of Commissioner Nathan Simington","edocs_bureau_code":"OCNS","id":190},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"AG","name":"Office of Commissioner Anna Gomez","edocs_bureau_code":"OCAG","id":9009}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"filing.openinternet.faulb.041624.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10416914805976/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"10416914805976","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-17T15:00:04.709Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-16T22:16:24.391Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-16T22:16:24.391Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"WTA -- Advocates for Rural Broadband"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-16T22:16:24.391Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"GS","name":"Office of Commissioner Geoffrey Starks","edocs_bureau_code":"OCGS","id":220}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Gerard J. Duffy"}],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"LSL2-#384688-v4-WISPA_Peraza_Net_Neutrality_Ex_Parte_Letter.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10416091381406/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"10416091381406","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-16T19:00:05.083Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-16T16:06:49.304Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-16T16:06:49.304Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"WISPA – The Association for Broadband Without Boundaries"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-16T16:06:49.304Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"NS","name":"Office of Commissioner Nathan Simington","edocs_bureau_code":"OCNS","id":190}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"LSL2-#384698-v1-WISPA_Steffen_Net_Neutrality_Ex_Parte_Letter.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1041662176316/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"1041662176316","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-16T19:00:05.083Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-16T16:31:26.558Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-16T16:31:26.558Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"WISPA – The Association for Broadband Without Boundaries"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-16T16:31:26.558Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"AG","name":"Office of Commissioner Anna Gomez","edocs_bureau_code":"OCAG","id":9009}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"2024 04 15 USTelecom Ex Parte.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10415913605126/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"10415913605126","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[{"name":"Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C."}],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-16T15:00:04.947Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-15T21:16:09.506Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-15T21:16:09.506Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"USTelecom - The Broadband Association"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-15T21:16:09.506Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"OSEC","name":"Office of the Secretary","edocs_bureau_code":"","id":103}],"entity":"Law Firm","authors":[{"name":"Scott H. Angstreich"}],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"2024-04-14 Gomez.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/104151353303989/1","description":"Notice of Ex Parte - Cmr Gomez et al"}],"id_submission":"104151353303989","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-16T15:00:04.947Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301793,"name":"17-142","bureau_code":"GN","description":"Improving Competitive Broadband Access to Multiple Tenant Environments","created_date":"2017-05-31T18:38:43.606Z","description_display":"Improving Competitive Broadband Access to Multiple Tenant Environments","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"General (Multiple Bureaus)"}],"date_received":"2024-04-15T22:11:44.729Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-15T22:11:44.729Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"Laurence Brett (\"Brett\") Glass, d/b/a LARIAT"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-15T22:11:44.729Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"AG","name":"Office of Commissioner Anna Gomez","edocs_bureau_code":"OCAG","id":9009}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"NCTA NN ex parte (4-15-24).pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10415138309129/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"10415138309129","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[{"name":"Latham & Watkins LLP"}],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-16T15:00:04.947Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-15T21:39:03.939Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-15T21:39:03.939Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"NCTA - The Internet & Television Association"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-15T21:39:03.939Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB","id":145},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"GC","name":"Office of General Counsel","edocs_bureau_code":"OGC","id":125},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"JR","name":"Office of Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel","edocs_bureau_code":"OCHJR","id":185},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"BC","name":"Office of Commissioner Brendan Carr","edocs_bureau_code":"OCBC","id":200},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"NS","name":"Office of Commissioner Nathan Simington","edocs_bureau_code":"OCNS","id":190},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"GS","name":"Office of Commissioner Geoffrey Starks","edocs_bureau_code":"OCGS","id":220}],"entity":"Law Firm","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"Ex Parte on Legislation 4.24.24.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/104151967915785/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"104151967915785","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-16T15:00:04.947Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-15T21:57:28.674Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-15T21:57:28.674Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"TechFreedom"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-15T21:57:28.674Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"AG","name":"Office of Commissioner Anna Gomez","edocs_bureau_code":"OCAG","id":9009}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"WISPA 310b.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/104150570610478/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"104150570610478","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[{"name":"Lerman Senter PLLC"}],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-16T15:00:04.947Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-15T22:09:49.225Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-15T22:09:49.225Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"WISPA - Broadband Without Boundaries"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-15T22:09:49.225Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB","id":145},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"WTB","name":"Wireless Telecommunications Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WTB","id":150},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"GC","name":"Office of General Counsel","edocs_bureau_code":"OGC","id":125},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"OIA","name":"Office of International Affairs","edocs_bureau_code":"OIA","id":230}],"entity":"Law Firm","authors":[{"name":"Jeffrey J. Carlisle"}],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"ATT April 15 2024 T2 Ex parte Chair Office FINAL PDF.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/104151947304135/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"104151947304135","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-15T19:00:05.350Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-15T15:38:53.379Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-15T15:38:53.379Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"AT&T Services, Inc."}],"date_submission":"2024-04-15T15:38:53.379Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"JR","name":"Office of Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel","edocs_bureau_code":"OCHJR","id":185}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Matt Nodine"}],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"ATT April 15 2024 T2 Ex parte Carr Office FINAL PDF.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10415367207150/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"10415367207150","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-15T19:00:05.350Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-15T15:30:58.569Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-15T15:30:58.569Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"AT&T Services, Inc."}],"date_submission":"2024-04-15T15:30:58.569Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"BC","name":"Office of Commissioner Brendan Carr","edocs_bureau_code":"OCBC","id":200}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Matt Nodine"}],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"WISPA Ex Parte re Gomez Roundtable.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1041520385862/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"1041520385862","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-15T17:00:04.594Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-15T14:14:44.194Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-15T14:14:44.194Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"WISPA – The Association for Broadband Without Boundaries"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-15T14:14:44.194Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"AG","name":"Office of Commissioner Anna Gomez","edocs_bureau_code":"OCAG","id":9009}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Louis Peraertz"}],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"2024 04 12 Verizon Title II ex parte.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1041288746330/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"1041288746330","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-12T17:00:05.177Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-12T14:56:18.334Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-12T14:56:18.334Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"Verizon"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-12T14:56:18.334Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"BC","name":"Office of Commissioner Brendan Carr","edocs_bureau_code":"OCBC","id":200}],"entity":"Author","authors":[{"name":"William H. Johnson"}],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10412247430555","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2024-04-12T15:00:05.109Z","filers":[{"name":"MéWhítñéy"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-12T11:11:33.327Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-12T11:11:33.327Z","text_data":"Really miss you please help us🥺","date_last_modified":"2024-04-12T11:11:33.327Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"LETTER","short":"LETTER","id":29,"abbreviation":"LT"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"Letter for Public Record Open Internet.docx","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10411227464732/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"10411227464732","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[{"name":"FCC"}],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-11T17:00:05.196Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-11T13:22:59.045Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-11T13:22:59.045Z","created":true,"is_confidential":false,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"Office of Economics and Analytics"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-11T13:22:59.045Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Law Firm","authors":[{"name":"Giulia McHenry"}],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"c1cj39rr6v.xlsx","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10410642903410/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"10410642903410","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-10T17:00:04.906Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-10T14:04:13.764Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-10T14:04:13.764Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"new"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-10T14:04:13.764Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Filer","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"ATT April 3 2024 NN T2 214 + Network Slicing Ex parte GOMEZ and STARKS FINAL PDF.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/104030121515296/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"104030121515296","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-03T21:00:05.317Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-03T17:12:32.576Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-03T17:12:32.576Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"AT&T Services, Inc."}],"date_submission":"2024-04-03T17:12:32.576Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"AG","name":"Office of Commissioner Anna Gomez","edocs_bureau_code":"OCAG","id":9009},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"GS","name":"Office of Commissioner Geoffrey Starks","edocs_bureau_code":"OCGS","id":220}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Matt Nodine"}],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"2024 04 01 Verizon Title II ex parte.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1040183551705/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"1040183551705","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-04-02T15:00:04.616Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-04-01T20:46:18.523Z","date_last_modified":"2024-04-01T20:46:18.523Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"Verizon"}],"date_submission":"2024-04-01T20:46:18.523Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"GS","name":"Office of Commissioner Geoffrey Starks","edocs_bureau_code":"OCGS","id":220}],"entity":"Author","authors":[{"name":"William H. Johnson"}],"_index":"filings.2024.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"ATT March 29 2024 NN T2 214 + Network Slicing Ex parte CHAIR and SIMINGTON FINAL PDF.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10329198676274/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"10329198676274","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-03-29T19:00:04.825Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-03-29T15:55:26.998Z","date_last_modified":"2024-03-29T15:55:26.998Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"AT&T Services, Inc."}],"date_submission":"2024-03-29T15:55:26.998Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"JR","name":"Office of Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel","edocs_bureau_code":"OCHJR","id":185},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"NS","name":"Office of Commissioner Nathan Simington","edocs_bureau_code":"OCNS","id":190}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Matt Nodine"}],"_index":"filings.2024.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"ATT March 27 2024 NN T2 214 + Network Slicing Ex parte FINAL PDF.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10327788012241/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"10327788012241","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-03-28T15:00:04.925Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-03-27T19:06:52.082Z","date_last_modified":"2024-03-27T19:06:52.082Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"AT&T Services, Inc."}],"date_submission":"2024-03-27T19:06:52.082Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB","id":145}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Matthew Nodine"}],"_index":"filings.2024.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"2024 03 27 USTelecom Ex Parte.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10327030486383/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"10327030486383","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[{"name":"Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C."}],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-03-27T17:00:04.938Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-03-27T14:05:24.590Z","date_last_modified":"2024-03-27T14:05:24.590Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"USTelecom - The Broadband Association"}],"date_submission":"2024-03-27T14:05:24.590Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"OSEC","name":"Office of the Secretary","edocs_bureau_code":"","id":103}],"entity":"Law Firm","authors":[{"name":"Scott H. Angstreich"}],"_index":"filings.2024.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"LETTER","short":"LETTER","id":29,"abbreviation":"LT"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"NCTA Response to Lumen (3.25.2024).pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10325103345696/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"10325103345696","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[{"name":"Latham & Watkins LLP"}],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-03-26T15:00:04.788Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-03-25T21:11:19.232Z","date_last_modified":"2024-03-25T21:11:19.232Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"NCTA – The Internet & Television Association"}],"date_submission":"2024-03-25T21:11:19.232Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Law Firm","authors":[{"name":"Matthew A. Brill"}],"_index":"filings.2024.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"2024 03 22 CTIA, USTelecom Ex Parte.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1032284297628/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"1032284297628","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[{"name":"Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C."}],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-03-25T15:00:05.030Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-03-22T20:37:42.906Z","date_last_modified":"2024-03-22T20:37:42.906Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"CTIA"},{"name":"USTelecom - The Broadband Association"}],"date_submission":"2024-03-22T20:37:42.906Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"OSEC","name":"Office of the Secretary","edocs_bureau_code":"","id":103}],"entity":"Law Firm","authors":[{"name":"Scott H. Angstreich"},{"name":"Adam D. Krinsky"}],"_index":"filings.2024.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"NCTA NN ex parte (3-21-24).pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10321033613119/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"10321033613119","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[{"name":"Latham & Watkins LLP"}],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-03-22T15:00:04.854Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-03-21T21:54:18.645Z","date_last_modified":"2024-03-21T21:54:18.645Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"NCTA – The Internet & Television Association"}],"date_submission":"2024-03-21T21:54:18.645Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"JR","name":"Office of Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel","edocs_bureau_code":"OCHJR","id":185}],"entity":"Law Firm","authors":[{"name":"Matthew A. Brill"}],"_index":"filings.2024.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"2024 03 20 USTelecom Ex Parte.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10320847014348/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"10320847014348","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[{"name":"Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C."}],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-03-21T15:00:05.055Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-03-20T20:31:52.375Z","date_last_modified":"2024-03-20T20:31:52.375Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"USTelecom - The Broadband Association"}],"date_submission":"2024-03-20T20:31:52.375Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"OSEC","name":"Office of the Secretary","edocs_bureau_code":"","id":103}],"entity":"Law Firm","authors":[{"name":"Scott H. Angstreich"}],"_index":"filings.2024.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"2024 03 15 Verizon Title II ex parte.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10315031463001/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"10315031463001","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-03-15T17:00:04.729Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-03-15T14:44:04.735Z","date_last_modified":"2024-03-15T14:44:04.735Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"Verizon"}],"date_submission":"2024-03-15T14:44:04.734Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"JR","name":"Office of Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel","edocs_bureau_code":"OCHJR","id":185}],"entity":"Author","authors":[{"name":"William H. Johnson"}],"_index":"filings.2024.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"Wireline Bureau Ex Parte.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10312255626200/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"10312255626200","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-03-12T16:00:24.353Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-03-12T00:17:12.977Z","date_last_modified":"2024-03-12T00:17:12.977Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"Public Knowledge"}],"date_submission":"2024-03-12T00:17:12.977Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB","id":145},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"PSHSB","name":"Public Safety & Homeland Security Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"PSHSB","id":155},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"GC","name":"Office of General Counsel","edocs_bureau_code":"OGC","id":125}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"2024 03 08 USTelecom Ex Parte.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1030836723724/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"1030836723724","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[{"name":"Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C."}],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-03-11T16:00:24.638Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-03-08T21:07:09.582Z","date_last_modified":"2024-03-08T21:07:09.582Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"USTelecom - The Broadband Association"}],"date_submission":"2024-03-08T21:07:09.581Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"OSEC","name":"Office of the Secretary","edocs_bureau_code":"","id":103}],"entity":"Law Firm","authors":[{"name":"Scott H. Angstreich"}],"_index":"filings.2024.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10308896326259","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2024-03-08T20:00:24.785Z","filers":[{"name":"Robin miller"}],"date_submission":"2024-03-08T16:10:04.399Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-03-08T16:10:04.399Z","text_data":"Need all info in regards to my self","date_last_modified":"2024-03-08T16:10:04.399Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"2024 03 06 USTelecom Ex Parte.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/103062163907826/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"103062163907826","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[{"name":"Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C."}],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-03-07T16:00:24.991Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-03-06T21:53:13.105Z","date_last_modified":"2024-03-06T21:53:13.105Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"USTelecom - The Broadband Association"}],"date_submission":"2024-03-06T21:53:13.105Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"OSEC","name":"Office of the Secretary","edocs_bureau_code":"","id":103}],"entity":"Law Firm","authors":[{"name":"Scott H. Angstreich"}],"_index":"filings.2024.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"2024 03 06 Verizon Title II ex parte.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1030627719787/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"1030627719787","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-03-07T16:00:24.991Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-03-06T22:41:34.363Z","date_last_modified":"2024-03-06T22:41:34.363Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"Verizon"}],"date_submission":"2024-03-06T22:41:34.363Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB","id":145},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"WTB","name":"Wireless Telecommunications Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WTB","id":150},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"OIA","name":"Office of International Affairs","edocs_bureau_code":"OIA","id":230},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"PSHSB","name":"Public Safety & Homeland Security Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"PSHSB","id":155},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"GC","name":"Office of General Counsel","edocs_bureau_code":"OGC","id":125}],"entity":"Author","authors":[{"name":"William H. Johnson"}],"_index":"filings.2024.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"NCTA NN ex parte (3-6-24).pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10306858816900/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"10306858816900","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[{"name":"Latham & Watkins LLP"}],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-03-07T16:00:24.991Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-03-06T20:57:48.680Z","date_last_modified":"2024-03-06T20:57:48.680Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"NCTA - The Internet & Television Association"}],"date_submission":"2024-03-06T20:57:48.680Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"WTB","name":"Wireless Telecommunications Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WTB","id":150}],"entity":"Law Firm","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"Gomez Office Ex Parte.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10304477830250/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"10304477830250","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-03-05T16:00:24.691Z","proceedings":[{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-03-04T21:16:27.163Z","date_last_modified":"2024-03-04T21:16:27.163Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"Public Knowledge"}],"date_submission":"2024-03-04T21:16:27.163Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"AG","name":"Office of Commissioner Anna Gomez","edocs_bureau_code":"OCAG","id":9009}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"DECLARATORY RULING","short":"DEC RULING","id":126,"abbreviation":"DR"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"Rule 315 - Leave to Appeal From the Appellate Court to the Supreme Court.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10305043654816/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"10305043654816","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"Dol","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[{"name":"Note: By checking this box, I acknowledge that I am filing a document into an official FCC proceeding. All information submitted, including names and addresses, will be publicly available via the web. Privacy Act Statement"}],"file_number":"23-6162","report_number":"Ptab001","date_disseminated":"2024-03-05T16:00:24.691Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-03-05T00:26:16.736Z","date_last_modified":"2024-03-05T00:26:16.736Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"Respondent"},{"name":"Ptab001"}],"date_submission":"2024-03-05T00:26:16.736Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Confidentiak"}],"_index":"filings.2024.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"Starks Office Ex Parte.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10229300229382/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"10229300229382","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-03-01T16:00:24.569Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-02-29T22:02:42.438Z","date_last_modified":"2024-02-29T22:02:42.438Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"Public Knowledge"}],"date_submission":"2024-02-29T22:02:42.438Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"GS","name":"Office of Commissioner Geoffrey Starks","edocs_bureau_code":"OCGS","id":220},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB","id":145}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Nat Purser"}],"_index":"filings.2024.2","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"2024 02 27 USTelecom Ex Parte re FCC Staff Meeting.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/102270988319226/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"102270988319226","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[{"name":"Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C."}],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-02-28T16:00:24.404Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-02-27T23:42:30.904Z","date_last_modified":"2024-02-27T23:42:30.904Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"USTelecom - The Broadband Association"}],"date_submission":"2024-02-27T23:42:30.904Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"OSEC","name":"Office of the Secretary","edocs_bureau_code":"","id":103}],"entity":"Law Firm","authors":[{"name":"Scott H. Angstreich"}],"_index":"filings.2024.2","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"NCTA NN ex parte (2-26-24).pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10226991506856/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"10226991506856","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[{"name":"Latham & Watkins LLP"}],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-02-27T16:00:24.992Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-02-26T20:45:32.194Z","date_last_modified":"2024-02-26T20:45:32.194Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"NCTA - The Internet & Television Association"}],"date_submission":"2024-02-26T20:45:32.194Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB","id":145},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"GC","name":"Office of General Counsel","edocs_bureau_code":"OGC","id":125},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"PSHSB","name":"Public Safety & Homeland Security Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"PSHSB","id":155},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"OIA","name":"Office of International Affairs","edocs_bureau_code":"OIA","id":230}],"entity":"Law Firm","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.2","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"2024 02 23 NCTA-USTelecom Ex Parte.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1022310799567/1","description":""},{"filename":"2024 02 23 Israel-Keating-OBrien-Shampine White Paper.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1022310799567/2","description":""}],"id_submission":"1022310799567","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[{"name":"Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C."},{"name":"Latham & Watkins LLP"}],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-02-26T16:00:24.767Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-02-23T21:00:08.175Z","date_last_modified":"2024-02-23T21:00:08.175Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"US Telecom - The Broadband Association"},{"name":"NCTA - The Internet & Television Association"}],"date_submission":"2024-02-23T21:00:08.175Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"OSEC","name":"Office of the Secretary","edocs_bureau_code":"","id":103}],"entity":"Author","authors":[{"name":"Scott H. Angstreich"}],"_index":"filings.2024.2","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"Chairwoman Rosenworcel Office Title II Ex Parte copy.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/102162463212442/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"102162463212442","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-02-20T16:00:24.706Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-02-16T22:15:21.830Z","date_last_modified":"2024-02-16T22:15:21.830Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"Public Knowledge"}],"date_submission":"2024-02-16T22:15:21.830Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"JR","name":"Office of Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel","edocs_bureau_code":"OCHJR","id":185}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.2","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"Rosenworcel Office Ex Parte.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1021692802976/1","description":"Chairwoman Rosenworcel Office - Notice of Ex Parte"}],"id_submission":"1021692802976","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-02-20T16:00:24.706Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-02-16T21:38:33.497Z","date_last_modified":"2024-02-16T21:38:33.497Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"Nat Purser, John Bergmayer, Harold Feld"}],"date_submission":"2024-02-16T21:38:33.497Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"JR","name":"Office of Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel","edocs_bureau_code":"OCHJR","id":185}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.2","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"LETTER","short":"LETTER","id":29,"abbreviation":"LT"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"300124_FederationLetter_FCC_TitleII.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/101302639911412/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"101302639911412","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-01-30T19:00:42.902Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-01-30T16:32:42.181Z","date_last_modified":"2024-01-30T16:32:42.181Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"U.S. Chamber of Commerce"},{"name":"The Business Council of Alabama"},{"name":"Mobile Chamber"},{"name":"Prattville Area Chamber of Commerce"},{"name":"South Baldwin Chamber of Commerce"},{"name":"Chandler Chamber of Commerce"},{"name":"Camden Regional Chamber of Commerce"},{"name":"Daytona Regional Chamber of Commerce"},{"name":"Greater Boca Raton Chamber of Commerce"},{"name":"Greater Miami Chamber of Commerce"},{"name":"Tampa Bay Chamber"},{"name":"Georgia Chamber of Commerce"},{"name":"Metro Atlanta Chamber"},{"name":"Iowa Association of Business and Industry"},{"name":"Fort Madison Partners"},{"name":"Mason City Chamber of Commerce"},{"name":"Sioux Center Chamber of Commerce"},{"name":"Kentucky Chamber of Commerce"},{"name":"Union County KY Chamber of Commerce"},{"name":"Barry County Chamber and Economic Development Alliance"},{"name":"Michigan Chamber of Commerce"},{"name":"Detroit Regional Chamber"},{"name":"Grand Rapids Chamber"},{"name":"Michigan West Coast Chamber of Commerce"},{"name":"Oscoda-AuSable Chamber of Commerce"},{"name":"Shakopee Chamber & Visitors Bureau"},{"name":"Southern Wayne County Regional Chamber"},{"name":"Brainerd Lakes Chamber of Commerce"},{"name":"Cannon Falls Area Chamber of Commerce"},{"name":"Delano Area Chamber of Commerce"},{"name":"Greater Mankato Growth"},{"name":"Lonsdale Area Chamber of Commerce"},{"name":"Marshall Area Chamber of Commerce"},{"name":"Minneapolis Regional Chamber"},{"name":"Winona Area Chamber of Commerce"},{"name":"Mississippi Economic Council - the State Chamber"},{"name":"Area Development Partnership - Greater Hattiesburg, MS"},{"name":"Missouri Chamber of Commerce and Industry"},{"name":"Kennett Chamber of Commerce"},{"name":"St. Charles Regional Chamber"},{"name":"Kearney Area Chamber of Commerce"},{"name":"Seward County Chamber & Development Partnership"},{"name":"Greater North Dakota Chamber"},{"name":"The Chamber Grand Forks / East Grand Forks"},{"name":"FMWF Chamber of Commerce"},{"name":"Chillicothe Ross Chamber of Commerce"},{"name":"Ottawa Area Chamber of Commerce"},{"name":"Toledo Regional Chamber of Commerce"},{"name":"Greater Sioux Falls Chamber of Commerce"},{"name":"Kingsport Chamber"},{"name":"Fort Bend Chamber"},{"name":"Grapevine Chamber of Commerce"},{"name":"Longview TX Chamber of Commerce"},{"name":"North Texas Commission"},{"name":"Rockport-Fulton Chamber of Commerce"},{"name":"West Columbia Chamber of Commerce"},{"name":"Marinette Menominee Area Chamber of Commerce"}],"date_submission":"2024-01-30T16:32:42.181Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Matt Furlow"}],"_index":"filings.2024.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1011852129564","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2024-01-18T16:00:18.509Z","filers":[{"name":"Molly Willis"}],"date_submission":"2024-01-18T00:30:40.575Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-01-18T00:30:40.575Z","text_data":"I strongly support Net Neutrality and Title II.\n\nPlease take care this matter.  ","date_last_modified":"2024-01-18T00:30:40.575Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"REPLY TO COMMENTS","short":"REPLY COMM","id":89,"abbreviation":"RC"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"Public Knowledge_NN Reply Comment_01.17.24.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/101181964809154/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"101181964809154","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-01-18T16:00:18.509Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-01-18T00:12:53.761Z","date_last_modified":"2024-01-18T00:12:53.761Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"Public Knowledge"}],"date_submission":"2024-01-18T00:12:53.761Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"John Bergmayer"},{"name":"Nicholas P. Garcia"}],"_index":"filings.2024.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"REPLY TO COMMENTS","short":"REPLY COMM","id":89,"abbreviation":"RC"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"TechFreedom reply comments - Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet - January 17 2024.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/101180336006533/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"101180336006533","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-01-18T16:00:18.509Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-01-18T01:49:33.987Z","date_last_modified":"2024-01-18T01:49:33.987Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"TechFreedom"}],"date_submission":"2024-01-18T01:49:33.987Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Filer","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101181317330084","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2024-01-18T16:00:18.509Z","filers":[{"name":"Pat Willis"}],"date_submission":"2024-01-18T00:06:51.139Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-01-18T00:06:51.139Z","text_data":"As a concerned American Citizen, I strongly support Net Neutrality and Title II authority. \n\nISP's should not be creating slower lanes for their competitors or for regular people and then provide fast lanes for their own content or for giant corporations.\n\nAs a government entity who should stand for its citizens, and fairness and equal protection, Preserving Net Neutrality is the RIGHTTHING TO DO!!!! ","date_last_modified":"2024-01-18T00:06:51.139Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101182097918221","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2024-01-18T16:00:18.509Z","filers":[{"name":"Matt Willis"}],"date_submission":"2024-01-18T00:39:11.445Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-01-18T00:39:11.445Z","text_data":"I strongly support Net Neutrality and Title II.\n\nPlease be sure it is preserved.","date_last_modified":"2024-01-18T00:39:11.445Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"REPLY","short":"REPLY","id":120,"abbreviation":"RL"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"CTIA Reply_Docket Nos. 17-108, 17-287, 11-42 (011724).pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1011883797699/1","description":""},{"filename":"CTIA Open Internet Reply Comments (011724).pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1011883797699/2","description":""}],"id_submission":"1011883797699","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-01-18T16:00:18.509Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-01-18T03:57:40.869Z","date_last_modified":"2024-01-18T03:57:40.869Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"CTIA"}],"date_submission":"2024-01-18T03:57:40.869Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Amy Bender"}],"_index":"filings.2024.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"REPLY TO COMMENTS","short":"REPLY COMM","id":89,"abbreviation":"RC"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"2024 01 17 USTelecom Reply Comments.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10117636723266/1","description":""},{"filename":"Ex A - 2024-01-17 As Filed Grotto Paper.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10117636723266/2","description":""},{"filename":"Ex B - 2024-01-17 As Filed Recon Analytics Paper.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10117636723266/3","description":""}],"id_submission":"10117636723266","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[{"name":"Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C."}],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-01-18T16:00:18.509Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-01-17T22:10:42.628Z","date_last_modified":"2024-01-17T22:10:42.628Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"USTelecom - The Broadband Association"}],"date_submission":"2024-01-17T22:10:42.627Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Law Firm","authors":[{"name":"Scott H. Angstreich"}],"_index":"filings.2024.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101182654613635","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2024-01-18T16:00:18.509Z","filers":[{"name":"Raymond Willis"}],"date_submission":"2024-01-18T00:55:00.091Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-01-18T00:55:00.091Z","text_data":"I strongly support Net Neutrality and Title II.\n\nPlease see that Net Neutrality and Title II continue to offer a level playing field for everyone to compete for business.","date_last_modified":"2024-01-18T00:55:00.091Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"REPLY TO COMMENTS","short":"REPLY COMM","id":89,"abbreviation":"RC"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"NCTA Reply Comments on OI NPRM (1.17.2024).pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/101172874005262/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"101172874005262","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[{"name":"Latham & Watkins LLP"}],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-01-18T16:00:18.509Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-01-17T22:14:02.342Z","date_last_modified":"2024-01-17T22:14:02.342Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"NCTA – The Internet & Television Association"},{"name":"California Broadband & Video Association"},{"name":"Florida Internet & Television Association"},{"name":"Indiana Cable & Broadband Association"},{"name":"MCTA – The Missouri Internet & Television Association"},{"name":"New England Connectivity and Telecommunications Association"},{"name":"North Carolina Cable Telecommunications Association, Inc."},{"name":"Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association"},{"name":"Texas Cable Association"}],"date_submission":"2024-01-17T22:14:02.342Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Law Firm","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION","short":"REPLY OPPOSE","id":91,"abbreviation":"RR"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"INCOMPAS Reply to WISPA Opposition (1.17.24).pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1011778428813/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"1011778428813","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2024-01-17T20:00:18.729Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2024-01-17T16:48:01.836Z","date_last_modified":"2024-01-17T16:48:01.836Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"INCOMPAS"}],"date_submission":"2024-01-17T16:48:01.836Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Filer","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2024.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"TechFreedom Title II Comments - 12.14.23.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/121524939586/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"121524939586","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2023-12-15T16:00:18.697Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1689021925679,"name":"23-230","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Wireline Competition Bureau Copper Retirement Network Change Notification Filed By The Ohio Bell Telephone Company D/B/A AT&T Ohio","created_date":"2023-07-10T20:11:10.000Z","description_display":"Wireline Competition Bureau Copper Retirement Network Change Notification Filed By The Ohio Bell Telephone Company D/B/A AT&T Ohio","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2023-12-15T08:01:23.291Z","date_last_modified":"2023-12-15T08:01:23.291Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"TechFreedom"}],"date_submission":"2023-12-15T08:01:23.290Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Berin Szoka, James Dunstan"}],"_index":"filings.2023.12","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"NCTA Comments on OI NPRM (12.14.2023).pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/121484978453/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"121484978453","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[{"name":"Latham & Watkins LLP"}],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2023-12-15T16:00:18.697Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2023-12-14T21:17:50.214Z","date_last_modified":"2023-12-14T21:17:50.214Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"NCTA – The Internet & Television Association"}],"date_submission":"2023-12-14T21:17:50.214Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Law Firm","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2023.12","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"2023 12 14 USTelecom Comments (to be filed).pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1214671128530/1","description":""},{"filename":"2023 12 13 Exhibit A - Analysys Mason Report.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1214671128530/2","description":""}],"id_submission":"1214671128530","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[{"name":"Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C."}],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2023-12-15T16:00:18.697Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2023-12-14T21:31:51.703Z","date_last_modified":"2023-12-14T21:31:51.703Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"USTelecom - The Broadband Association"}],"date_submission":"2023-12-14T21:31:51.702Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Law Firm","authors":[{"name":"Scott H. Angstreich"}],"_index":"filings.2023.12","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"Public_Knowledge-Open_Internet_Comments_Recon_Dockets_Dec2023.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/121556998449/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"121556998449","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2023-12-15T16:00:18.697Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2023-12-15T01:36:41.083Z","date_last_modified":"2023-12-15T01:36:41.083Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"Public Knowledge"}],"date_submission":"2023-12-15T01:36:41.083Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"John Bergmayer"}],"_index":"filings.2023.12","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"OPPOSITION","short":"OPPOSE","id":57,"abbreviation":"OP"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"WISPA Opposition to INCOMPAS Recon Petition re Section 224.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/12142520302403/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"12142520302403","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2023-12-15T16:00:18.697Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2023-12-14T20:32:50.213Z","date_last_modified":"2023-12-14T20:32:50.213Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"WISPA – Broadband Without Boundaries"}],"date_submission":"2023-12-14T20:32:50.213Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Louis Peraertz"}],"_index":"filings.2023.12","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"2023 12 14 Comments of Verizon.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1214489314927/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"1214489314927","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2023-12-15T16:00:18.697Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2023-12-14T22:19:50.429Z","date_last_modified":"2023-12-14T22:19:50.429Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"Verizon"}],"date_submission":"2023-12-14T22:19:50.429Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Alison N. Steger"}],"_index":"filings.2023.12","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"TechFreedom comments - Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet 12 14 23.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1215250202437/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"1215250202437","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2023-12-15T16:00:18.697Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1689021925679,"name":"23-230","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Wireline Competition Bureau Copper Retirement Network Change Notification Filed By The Ohio Bell Telephone Company D/B/A AT&T Ohio","created_date":"2023-07-10T20:11:10.000Z","description_display":"Wireline Competition Bureau Copper Retirement Network Change Notification Filed By The Ohio Bell Telephone Company D/B/A AT&T Ohio","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2023-12-15T04:13:30.911Z","date_last_modified":"2023-12-15T04:13:30.911Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"TechFreedom"}],"date_submission":"2023-12-15T04:13:30.911Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Filer","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2023.12","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"CTIA Response to Public Notice re PFRs.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1214239075879/1","description":""},{"filename":"CTIA Open Internet Comments (121423).pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1214239075879/2","description":""},{"filename":"Exhibit A - Compass Lexecon Report.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1214239075879/3","description":""},{"filename":"Exhibit B - Declaration of Peter Rysavy.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1214239075879/4","description":""}],"id_submission":"1214239075879","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2023-12-15T16:00:18.697Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2023-12-14T21:31:10.796Z","date_last_modified":"2023-12-14T21:31:10.796Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"CTIA"}],"date_submission":"2023-12-14T21:31:10.796Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Amy Bender"}],"_index":"filings.2023.12","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"ATT NN Comments 12-14-2023.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/12140407728115/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"12140407728115","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[{"name":"Sidley Austin LLP"}],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2023-12-14T22:00:18.615Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2023-12-14T19:35:53.774Z","date_last_modified":"2023-12-14T19:35:53.774Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"AT&T Services, Inc."}],"date_submission":"2023-12-14T19:35:53.774Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Law Firm","authors":[{"name":"Jonathan E. Nuechterlein"}],"_index":"filings.2023.12","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"FCC WC Docket No 17-108 CPUC Comment on Petitions for Reconsideration.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/12141098824413/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"12141098824413","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2023-12-14T22:00:18.615Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2023-12-14T18:27:09.366Z","date_last_modified":"2023-12-14T18:27:09.366Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"California Public Utilities Commission"}],"date_submission":"2023-12-14T18:27:09.366Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Kimberly Lippi"}],"_index":"filings.2023.12","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"FINAL INCOMPAS Net Neutrality Comments, WC Docket No. 23-320 (12.14.23).pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1214097190544/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"1214097190544","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2023-12-14T20:00:18.927Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2023-12-14T17:15:31.048Z","date_last_modified":"2023-12-14T17:15:31.048Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"INCOMPAS"}],"date_submission":"2023-12-14T17:15:31.048Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Filer","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2023.12","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1210192930371","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2023-12-11T16:00:18.788Z","filers":[{"name":"SHANIKA JACKSON"}],"date_submission":"2023-12-10T06:06:35.249Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2023-12-11T06:06:35.249Z","text_data":"Advocate against domestic violence and child abuse ","date_last_modified":"2023-12-10T06:06:35.249Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2023.12","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1117776204699","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2023-11-20T15:00:19.745Z","filers":[{"name":"Miranda Evans"}],"date_submission":"2023-11-17T19:34:53.498Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2023-11-17T19:34:53.499Z","text_data":"Unsure of everything ","date_last_modified":"2023-11-17T19:34:53.499Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2023.11","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"11080623814696","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2023-11-09T15:00:19.849Z","filers":[{"name":"Miranda Evans"}],"date_submission":"2023-11-08T21:42:11.600Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2023-11-08T21:42:11.600Z","text_data":"My identity was stolen, and I have literally had trouble with every single thing in my life for the past years","date_last_modified":"2023-11-08T21:42:11.600Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2023.11","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"102278626363","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2023-10-23T15:00:19.849Z","filers":[{"name":"Overstanding Qween"},{"name":"& Kings"}],"date_submission":"2023-10-22T04:57:09.004Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2023-10-23T04:57:09.004Z","text_data":"Want to participate ","date_last_modified":"2023-10-22T04:57:09.004Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2023.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"Net Neutrality.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1020112094976/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"1020112094976","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2023-10-23T15:00:19.849Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2023-10-20T21:50:07.552Z","date_last_modified":"2023-10-20T21:50:07.552Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"Damon Hall"}],"date_submission":"2023-10-20T21:50:07.552Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Filer","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2023.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"TESTIMONY","short":"TESTIMONY","id":112,"abbreviation":"TS"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"2023-10-22 Thought Robbers Pt 2 Practice-1.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1022753313334/1","description":"File detailing my experience as a Targeted Individual of psychotronic weaponry tests."},{"filename":"2021-08-26 - Letter to English authorities.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1022753313334/2","description":"Letter I sent to English authorities regarding compensation for being a TI of illegal experiments."},{"filename":"2022-11-12 Compensation update.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1022753313334/3","description":"First compensation update I sent to English authorities regarding compensation for being a TI of illegal experiments."},{"filename":"2023-07-21 Compensation update 2.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1022753313334/4","description":"Second compensation update I sent to English authorities regarding compensation for being a TI of illegal experiments."},{"filename":"2022-12-06 - Letter to Polish PM.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1022753313334/5","description":"Letter I sent to Polish authorities regarding compensation for being a TI of illegal experiments."},{"filename":"2023-07-21 aktualizacja roszczenia.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1022753313334/6","description":"[Polish language file] First compensation update I sent to Polish authorities regarding compensation for being a TI of illegal experiments."}],"id_submission":"1022753313334","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2023-10-23T15:00:19.849Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2023-10-23T16:13:57.137Z","date_last_modified":"2023-10-22T16:13:57.137Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"Jan Wozny"}],"date_submission":"2023-10-22T16:13:57.137Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Author","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2023.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"filingsCount":0,"flag_public":"N","short":"PUB NOTICE","description":"PUBLIC NOTICE","id":88,"type":"PN"},"is_staff_upload":0,"documents":[{"filename":"DA-23-996A1.pdf","src":"https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-23-996A1.pdf","description":""}],"delegated_authority_number":"DA-23-996","id_submission":"10190430130848","bureaus":[{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"}],"lawfirms":[{"name":"FCC"}],"bureau_id":"","date_comment_period":null,"file_number":"","admincomment":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2023-10-19T17:00:00.000Z","id_edocs":397841,"proceedings":[{"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2023-10-19T17:00:00.000Z","reg_flex_analysis":"N","date_last_modified":"2023-10-23T21:47:03.000Z","small_business_impact":"N","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"fcc_record":"","date_reply_comment":null,"express_comment":0,"is_action":1,"exparte_or_late_filed":"N","filers":[{"name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_submission":"2023-10-19T17:00:00.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"trackChanges":[{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2023-10-19T21:00:39.155Z"},{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2023-10-20T16:30:40.422Z"},{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2023-10-23T16:45:24.248Z"},{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2023-10-23T17:00:39.546Z"}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"_index":"filings.actions.2023"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"ex_parte_coalition_Rosenworcel_meeting_10-12-2023.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1016187913061/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"1016187913061","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2023-10-16T19:00:19.907Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2023-10-16T15:16:37.437Z","date_last_modified":"2023-10-16T15:16:37.437Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"Public Knowledge"},{"name":"Future of Music Coalition"},{"name":"Writers Guild of America - West"},{"name":"Free Press"},{"name":"Fight for the Future"},{"name":"The Greenlining Institute"},{"name":"Benton Institute for Broadband and Society"},{"name":"Open Technology Institute"},{"name":"Demand Progress"},{"name":"ACLU of Northern California"}],"date_submission":"2023-10-16T15:16:37.436Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"JR","name":"Office of Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel","edocs_bureau_code":"OCHJR","id":185}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Public Knowledge"}],"_index":"filings.2023.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"FaulbTitleIIExParte12October2023.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/101354094987/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"101354094987","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2023-10-13T15:00:19.765Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2023-10-13T02:00:56.573Z","date_last_modified":"2023-10-13T02:00:56.573Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"Benton Institute for Broadband & Society"}],"date_submission":"2023-10-13T02:00:56.573Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"GS","name":"Office of Commissioner Geoffrey Starks","edocs_bureau_code":"OCGS","id":220}],"entity":"Author","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Jay Schwartzman"}],"_index":"filings.2023.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"CORRECTION","short":"CORRECTION","id":208,"abbreviation":"CR"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"OCGExParteNoticeCORRECTED11October2023.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/101297419294/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"101297419294","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2023-10-12T15:00:19.805Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2023-10-12T01:32:13.219Z","date_last_modified":"2023-10-12T01:32:13.219Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"Benton Institute for Broadband & Society"},{"name":"Public Knowledge"},{"name":"Free Press"},{"name":"UCC-OC, Inc."},{"name":"County of Santa Clara"}],"date_submission":"2023-10-12T01:32:13.219Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"GC","name":"Office of General Counsel","edocs_bureau_code":"OGC","id":125}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Jay Schwartzman"}],"_index":"filings.2023.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"NagarajanTitleIIExParteNotice11October2023.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/101256195194/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"101256195194","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2023-10-12T15:00:19.805Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2023-10-12T01:14:05.625Z","date_last_modified":"2023-10-12T01:14:05.625Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"Benton Institute for Broadband & Society"}],"date_submission":"2023-10-12T01:14:05.624Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"JR","name":"Office of Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel","edocs_bureau_code":"OCHJR","id":185}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Jay Schwartzman"}],"_index":"filings.2023.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"Open Internet Tenth Floor October 11 2023.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1011306864221/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"1011306864221","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2023-10-12T15:00:19.805Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2023-10-11T21:02:13.674Z","date_last_modified":"2023-10-11T21:02:13.674Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"Public Knowledge"}],"date_submission":"2023-10-11T21:02:13.674Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"JR","name":"Office of Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel","edocs_bureau_code":"OCHJR","id":185},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"GS","name":"Office of Commissioner Geoffrey Starks","edocs_bureau_code":"OCGS","id":220},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"AG","name":"Office of Commissioner Anna Gomez","edocs_bureau_code":"OCAG","id":9009}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Harold Feld"}],"_index":"filings.2023.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"OCGTitleIIExParteNotice10October2023.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/101104818851/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"101104818851","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2023-10-11T15:00:20.191Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1695995125404,"name":"23-320","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","created_date":"2023-09-25T15:12:30.000Z","description_display":"Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301945,"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","created_date":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"date_closed":null,"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","created_date":"2011-03-01T13:07:53.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2023-10-11T02:41:04.559Z","date_last_modified":"2023-10-11T02:41:04.559Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"Benton Inst."},{"name":"Public Knowledge"},{"name":"Free Press"},{"name":"UCC, Inc."},{"name":"County of Santa Clara"}],"date_submission":"2023-10-11T02:41:04.559Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"GC","name":"Office of General Counsel","edocs_bureau_code":"OGC","id":125}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Jay Schwartzman"}],"_index":"filings.2023.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"APPEAL","short":"APPEAL","id":2,"abbreviation":"AL"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"DA-23-723A1.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1006083908391/1","description":""}],"id_submission":"1006083908391","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2023-10-06T21:00:19.808Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2023-10-06T18:51:26.589Z","date_last_modified":"2023-10-06T18:51:26.589Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"yana"}],"date_submission":"2023-10-06T18:51:26.589Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Author","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2023.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10924835819264","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2023-09-25T15:00:19.696Z","filers":[{"name":"Joseph Hutchens"}],"date_submission":"2023-09-24T11:46:33.891Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2023-09-25T11:46:33.891Z","text_data":"The request for internet information should be private and provided by outside sources. The ID of location based freedom could benefit.","date_last_modified":"2023-09-24T11:46:33.891Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2023.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"108151900006851","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2023-08-16T15:00:20.388Z","filers":[{"name":"Susan Davis"}],"date_submission":"2023-08-15T23:26:17.118Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2023-08-15T23:26:17.118Z","text_data":"I support net neutrality.","date_last_modified":"2023-08-15T23:26:17.118Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2023.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1081054847655","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2023-08-11T15:00:20.167Z","filers":[{"name":"La.gov"}],"date_submission":"2023-08-10T23:50:11.595Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2023-08-10T23:50:11.595Z","text_data":"Ty","date_last_modified":"2023-08-10T23:50:11.595Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2023.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"107231251520464","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2023-07-24T15:00:19.590Z","filers":[{"name":"Jane kim"},{"name":"David Kim"},{"name":"Yong Kim"},{"name":"Sang Kim"}],"date_submission":"2023-07-23T09:54:13.023Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2023-07-24T09:54:13.023Z","text_data":"To Ajit Pai,\nWe support strong Net Neutrality under title 2 oversight of ISPs.\nSincerely,\nKim's family\n","date_last_modified":"2023-07-23T09:54:13.023Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2023.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10428302338795","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2023-04-28T15:00:19.941Z","filers":[{"name":"Aina Trodden"}],"date_submission":"2023-04-28T03:05:06.874Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2023-04-28T03:05:06.874Z","text_data":"Net neutrality is extremely important and is a reflection for what I believe our nation should strive: a place where everyone is treated equally.  Every time this country opts to give those with deeper pockets a greater voice or greater opportunity, it leans toward making the nation's guiding principal of equality more of a door mat.  This principal should never be stepped upon.","date_last_modified":"2023-04-28T03:05:06.874Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2023.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10323162653993","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2023-03-23T17:00:19.800Z","filers":[{"name":"William Urban"}],"date_submission":"2023-03-23T14:49:04.967Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2023-03-23T14:49:04.967Z","text_data":"Tried T-Mobile, refundable $50 charged for trial, WiFi didn’t work, returned the modem – receipt confirmed. No refund in 10 business days as promised in their email.\n\nWhat next??\n\n\nT-Mobile # 223 246 1775 – password 5229121\n\n","date_last_modified":"2023-03-23T14:49:04.967Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2023.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"102272015326487","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2023-02-27T18:00:37.530Z","filers":[{"name":"Samantha Leshay Sims"}],"date_submission":"2023-02-27T14:58:19.701Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2023-02-27T14:58:19.701Z","text_data":"Needing copy ","date_last_modified":"2023-02-27T14:58:19.701Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2023.2","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10221268825868","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2023-02-22T16:00:37.583Z","filers":[{"name":"Amy S Wilcox"}],"date_submission":"2023-02-21T20:48:21.616Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2023-02-21T20:48:21.616Z","text_data":"Preserve net neutrality and Title II. I specifically support strong net neutrality backed by Title II oversight of ISPs.","date_last_modified":"2023-02-21T20:48:21.616Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2023.2","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10221175421492","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2023-02-21T16:00:37.382Z","filers":[{"name":"Shanika Jackson"}],"date_submission":"2023-02-21T03:26:12.660Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2023-02-21T03:26:12.660Z","text_data":"\"CEO of Overstanding & Kings\"","date_last_modified":"2023-02-21T03:26:12.660Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2023.2","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10105265871248","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2023-01-05T16:00:37.782Z","filers":[{"name":"Poole"},{"name":"O"}],"date_submission":"2023-01-05T05:26:06.063Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2023-01-05T05:26:06.063Z","text_data":"It is to my understanding that there was a survey done this June of 22 and due to this I a new resident to Mill Creek have had my internet freedom taken away.  I am forced to use ATT and it is absolutely terrible.  Everyone at the front of the subdivision and those in the middle can use Spectrum but Mill Creek Drive residence at the back of the subdivision have no choice but to use ATT.  Is this the USA or Communist China?  I am a disabled person that depends on the weather and emergency broadcasting, I do not get this from ATT.  Also I have had my Christian rights taken away from me in choosing what I wish to watch.  The Family programs  have been taken from me.  Not only do I pay for the use of ATT but if I want to watch something of interest I must pay an additional charge or pay for an account with that provider.  This is unacceptable.  Please do something about this.   Find out who the engineer was that worked with D.R. Horton in making this monopoly possible.  I intend to keep rattling the cage until something gets done.  Horton may need his cage rattled pretty hard for infringing upon my rights as a citizen of this community.","date_last_modified":"2023-01-05T05:26:06.063Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2023.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"12142277902977","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2022-12-14T19:00:25.901Z","filers":[{"name":"Steve Kram"}],"date_submission":"2022-12-14T15:33:33.529Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2022-12-14T15:33:33.529Z","text_data":"This is a TEST COMMENT submitted in support of the IT Test team ","date_last_modified":"2022-12-14T15:33:33.529Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2022.12","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"121306086805","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2022-12-13T17:00:24.915Z","filers":[{"name":"David Adair"}],"date_submission":"2022-12-13T13:27:39.507Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2022-12-13T13:27:39.507Z","text_data":"I strongly support net neutrality backed by Title 2 oversight of ISP’s.","date_last_modified":"2022-12-13T13:27:39.507Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2022.12","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1212189033733","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2022-12-12T15:00:26.409Z","filers":[{"name":"Sean Kerwin"},{"name":"Sean Kerwin"}],"date_submission":"2022-12-12T12:57:01.428Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2022-12-12T12:57:01.428Z","text_data":". In the comment section write, \"I strongly support net neutrality backed by Title 2 oversight of ISPs.\"","date_last_modified":"2022-12-12T12:57:01.428Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2022.12","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"120421037122","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2022-12-05T15:00:25.595Z","filers":[{"name":"Tiffany Cogdell"}],"date_submission":"2022-12-04T22:37:55.324Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2022-12-05T22:37:55.324Z","text_data":"Please restore Net Neutrality backed by Title II oversight of ISPs.","date_last_modified":"2022-12-04T22:37:55.324Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2022.12","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"103159783514","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2022-10-31T17:00:25.229Z","filers":[{"name":"Kevin Lahoda"}],"date_submission":"2022-10-31T13:46:33.721Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2022-10-31T13:46:33.721Z","text_data":" I strongly support net neutrality backed by Title 2 oversight of ISPs. Thank you.","date_last_modified":"2022-10-31T13:46:33.721Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2022.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10311208813999","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2022-10-31T17:00:25.229Z","filers":[{"name":"Robert Gottko"}],"date_submission":"2022-10-31T13:39:09.269Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2022-10-31T13:39:09.269Z","text_data":"I strongly support net neutrality backed by Title 2 oversight of ISPs.","date_last_modified":"2022-10-31T13:39:09.269Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2022.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1031572227585","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2022-10-31T17:00:25.229Z","filers":[{"name":"Jonathan Brennan"}],"date_submission":"2022-10-31T13:26:46.932Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2022-10-31T13:26:46.932Z","text_data":"I strongly support net neutrality backed by Title 2 oversight of ISPs.","date_last_modified":"2022-10-31T13:26:46.932Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2022.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"ACA Connects Ex Parte Notice.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10140137102229/1","description":""},{"filename":"ACA Connects Ex Parte Attachment A.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10140137102229/2","description":""},{"filename":"ACA Connects Ex Parte Attachment B.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10140137102229/3","description":""},{"filename":"ACA Connects Ex Parte Attachment C.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10140137102229/4","description":""}],"id_submission":"10140137102229","bureaus":[],"id_bureau":"","total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[{"name":"Kelley Drye & Warren LLP"}],"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2022-10-17T15:00:26.340Z","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2018-03-15T04:00:00.000Z","id_proceeding":301728,"name":"17-79","bureau_code":"WTB","description":"Accelerating Wireless Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment","created_date":"2017-03-24T18:41:50.530Z","description_display":"Accelerating Wireless Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment","sunshine_end_date":"2018-03-23T03:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireless Telecommunications Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"id_proceeding":301733,"name":"17-84","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Accelerating Wireline Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment","created_date":"2017-03-28T19:17:32.626Z","description_display":"Accelerating Wireline Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"id_proceeding":20211118032741,"name":"21-450","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Affordable Connectivity Program","created_date":"2021-11-18T16:54:13.000Z","description_display":"Affordable Connectivity Program","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"id_proceeding":2021121432321,"name":"21-476","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Report on the Future of the Universal Service Fund","created_date":"2021-12-13T14:52:10.000Z","description_display":"Report on the Future of the Universal Service Fund","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1010700930,"name":"05-311","bureau_code":"MB","description":"In the Matter of Implementation of Section 621(a) of the Cable Communications Policy Act of   1984 as amended by the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992. . .","created_date":"2005-11-03T09:17:34.000-05:00","description_display":"In the Matter of Implementation of Section 621(a) of the Cable Communications Policy Act of   1984 as amended by the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992. . .","bureau_name":"Media Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012001673,"name":"10-71","bureau_code":"MB","description":"Media Bureau Seeks Comment On A Petition for Rulemaking to Amend The Commission's Rule Governing Retransmission Consent","created_date":"2010-03-19T10:07:46.000-04:00","description_display":"Media Bureau Seeks Comment On A Petition for Rulemaking to Amend The Commission's Rule Governing Retransmission Consent","bureau_name":"Media Bureau"},{"sunshine_start_date":null,"id_proceeding":302150,"name":"18-122","bureau_code":"WTB","description":"Expanding Flexible Use of the 3.7 GHz to 4.2 GHz Band","created_date":"2018-04-19T14:58:54.843Z","description_display":"Expanding Flexible Use of the 3.7 GHz to 4.2 GHz Band","sunshine_end_date":null,"bureau_name":"Wireless Telecommunications Bureau"}],"date_received":"2022-10-14T20:03:20.652Z","date_last_modified":"2022-10-14T20:03:20.652Z","created":true,"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"ACA Connects - America's Communications Association"}],"date_submission":"2022-10-14T20:03:20.652Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"JR","name":"Office of Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel","edocs_bureau_code":"OCHJR","id":185},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"NS","name":"Office of Commissioner Nathan Simington","edocs_bureau_code":"OCNS","id":190},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"BC","name":"Office of Commissioner Brendan Carr","edocs_bureau_code":"OCBC","id":200},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"GS","name":"Office of Commissioner Geoffrey Starks","edocs_bureau_code":"OCGS","id":220}],"entity":"Law Firm","authors":[{"name":"Thomas Cohen"}],"_index":"filings.2022.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1081151944424","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2022-08-11T15:00:38.584Z","filers":[{"name":"Joseph Michel Littwin"}],"date_submission":"2022-08-11T02:47:19.208Z","filingstatus":{"filingstatus":"DISSEMINATED","description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2022-08-11T02:47:19.208Z","text_data":"Net neutrality is important for users of websites. Continued support of net neutrality is vital to the success of our country and especially the citizens. We need to allow the people who pay for subscriptions to the Internet selector content that they choose to watch. And not to be influenced by the ISP that chooses to support faster speeds to Internet servers who may choose to influence the ISP by way of money or any other consideration or even threats of damage.","date_last_modified":"2022-08-11T02:47:19.208Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2022.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10614280821472","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2022-06-14T15:00:15.270Z","filers":[{"name":"Noah Jurcin"}],"date_submission":"2022-06-14T05:03:53.793Z","filingstatus":{"filingstatus":"DISSEMINATED","description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2022-06-14T05:03:53.793Z","text_data":"I strongly support Net Neutrality, and the principle that ISP's should remain under Title 2. ","date_last_modified":"2022-06-14T05:03:53.793Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2022.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"105042845309858","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2022-05-05T15:00:16.162Z","filers":[{"name":"Robert Apgar"}],"date_submission":"2022-05-04T19:25:28.336Z","filingstatus":{"filingstatus":"DISSEMINATED","description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2022-05-04T19:25:28.336Z","text_data":"I think net neutrality should be reinstated... I fell that it should be reinstated because everyone should have equal access and equal use of the internet...Since low cost cell phone carriers use the major carriers towers they can slow the traffic down of the low cost carrier and everyone should have the same access and the same speed.  regardless of who your wireless carrier... Companies can also give priority to other companies traffic.. and this is wrong.... Please reinstate net neutrality... ","date_last_modified":"2022-05-04T19:25:28.336Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2022.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1042690235676","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2022-04-26T15:00:15.102Z","filers":[{"name":"KATIE ANN HENSON"}],"date_submission":"2022-04-26T09:52:01.932Z","filingstatus":{"filingstatus":"DISSEMINATED","description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2022-04-26T09:52:01.932Z","text_data":"ILLEGAL SEIZURE AND DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER\nFALSE TESTIMONY - IMPERSONATED BY TABITHA BLACKWELL","date_last_modified":"2022-04-26T09:52:01.932Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2022.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1041773988976","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2022-04-18T15:00:15.190Z","filers":[{"name":"Jeff Carmichael"}],"date_submission":"2022-04-17T14:42:57.158Z","filingstatus":{"filingstatus":"DISSEMINATED","description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2022-04-18T14:42:57.158Z","text_data":"Time for a change?","date_last_modified":"2022-04-17T14:42:57.158Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2022.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"flag_public":"Y","short":"COMMENT","description":"COMMENT","id":7,"type":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10411241823619","created":true,"total_page_count":0,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":1,"date_disseminated":"2022-04-11T15:00:09.694Z","filers":[{"name":"Phillip Sand Hansel II"}],"date_submission":"2022-04-11T11:47:35.279Z","filingstatus":{"filingstatus":"DISSEMINATED","description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","created_date":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2022-04-11T11:47:35.279Z","text_data":"Keep the Internet Neutral! \nRoll back Trump era moves that deregulate the Internet by giving all power from the people to the providers. It is OUR Internet not the service providers. The people deserve a better representative than a former service providers lawyer. ","date_last_modified":"2022-04-11T11:47:35.279Z","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2022.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1040106553702","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"filers":[{"name":"Mikkel"}],"date_submission":"2022-04-01T23:45:02.756Z","date_disseminated":"2022-04-04T17:40:21.655Z","filingstatus":{"filingstatus":"DISSEMINATED","description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981936,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":1,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981906,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2022-04-01T23:45:02.756Z","text_data":"This will get abused in some capacity and in some form. Anyone thinking it won't is expecting the American system to place value in something higher than the dollar. \nGofckyourself for voting in favour of this. Literally. Find a broomstick in the nearest closet, break off the tip so it's as smooth as your heart, and go to town on your own and your family's backdoors instead of those of strangers. Do unto others as you would like to have done unto you - so try screwing yourself over first.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2022.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1032624808030","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"filers":[{"name":"Gaylon Taylor"}],"date_submission":"2022-03-26T15:41:51.649Z","date_disseminated":"2022-03-28T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981935,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":1,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981905,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2022-03-28T13:00:03.000Z","text_data":"I support Title II oversight for ISPs","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2022.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"CONGRESSIONAL CORRESPONDENCE","short":"CONG CORRESP","id":125,"abbreviation":"CC"},"attachments":[],"is_staff_upload":1,"documents":[{"filename":"21-240MR_1.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10225399904194/1","description":""}],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10225399904194","total_page_count":26,"lawfirms":[{"name":"FCC"}],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"express_comment":0,"filers":[{"name":"Jessica Rosenworcel"}],"date_disseminated":"2022-02-25T18:37:40.758Z","date_submission":"2022-02-25T18:37:40.758Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2021-12-28T05:00:00.000Z","trackChanges":[{"user":"lisa.williams@fcc.gov","updated":"2022-02-25T18:37:40.592Z"}],"presented_to":[],"entity":"Law Firm","authors":[{"name":"Jessica Rosenworcel"}],"_index":"filings.2022.2","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10215266372039","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"filers":[{"name":"John Willimas"}],"date_submission":"2022-02-15T02:43:01.973Z","date_disseminated":"2022-02-15T16:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981933,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":5,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981903,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2022-02-15T02:43:01.973Z","text_data":"Please start working on getting Net Neutrality back on its feet. We as citizens should not be controlled by economic powers that decide which internet influence is best for us. We are free citizens that should not be hindered by monetary influence in something as open as the internet. A government that works for its people cares for its people so get to work on fixing the lack of regulations regarding Net Neutrality.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2022.2","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10212205828326","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"filers":[{"name":"Jeanica Rief"}],"date_submission":"2022-02-12T19:34:59.078Z","date_disseminated":"2022-02-14T18:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981932,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":4,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981902,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2022-02-14T14:00:03.000Z","text_data":"Keep the internet open! I hardly think, Mr Chairman, that you have an unbiased view on net neutrality given your past employment history with Verizon. But I'll digress from that. The bottom line is, access to information--open, unbiased, unfiltered access to information, is what will allow the very foundation of this country to thrive in the future. Now more than ever, is it important that everyone has access to data and information without an outside agent telling them what they should or shouldn't see. Please, for the love of all cat videos, baby giggles, and YouTubers putting up how-to videos such as extracting the last bit of toothpaste from a tube that's flatter than paper, KEEP THE INTERNET OPEN!","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2022.2","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10205266024953","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"filers":[{"name":"Net"},{"name":"Nutrailty"}],"date_submission":"2022-02-05T17:54:48.651Z","date_disseminated":"2022-02-07T16:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981931,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":3,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981901,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2022-02-07T14:00:02.000Z","text_data":"I strongly support Net neutrality supported by title II","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2022.2","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10201935700893","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"filers":[{"name":"Jamie Lindell"}],"date_submission":"2022-02-01T22:11:47.919Z","date_disseminated":"2022-02-02T16:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981930,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":2,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981900,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2022-02-01T22:11:47.919Z","text_data":"Chairman Pai, Commissioner Clyburn, Commissioner O'Rielly, Commissioner Carr, and Commissioner Rosenworcel,\n\nI support strong net neutrality, backed by title II oversight of ISP’s. Please preserve net neutrality and Title II!\n\nThank you.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2022.2","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1020147860503","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"filers":[{"name":"julia"}],"date_submission":"2022-02-01T04:34:17.390Z","date_disseminated":"2022-02-01T16:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981929,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":1,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981899,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2022-02-01T04:34:17.390Z","text_data":"doing an econ assignment on this rn and don't actually know if this repeal is still going on, so just in case I'm gonna leave this here. As a member of the future of this country and a part of the generation who has always had the internet and now control it, let me make this perfectly clear: DON'T YOU FUCKING DARE ALLOW THESE BIG ASS MONOPOLIES TO SCREW EVERYONE OVER BECAUSE THEYRE FILLING YOUR POCKETS OR I STG I WILL MARRY YOUR MF SON AND TURN HIM INTO A FEMINIST LIBERAL WHO WEARS DRESSES AND PAINTS HIS NAILS. IM FUCKING SERIOUS. I KNOW THAT'S YOUR WORST FEAR AND I HAVE NO PROBLEM USING IT AGAINST YOU, AS YOU DUMBASSES SEEM TO BE DOING WITH OUR INTERNET. NET NEUTRALITY UNDER TITLE 2 IS THE ONLY THING KEEPING COMCAST FROM MAKING MY SERVICE WORSE THAN IT ALREADY IS. I MEAN DO YOU EVEN UNDERSTAND HOW LONG IT TOOK TO EVEN LOAD THIS PAGE? YOU AND I BOTH KNOW THEY'LL ONLY MAKE IT SLOWER FOR PEOPLE WHO CAN'T AFFORD HIGHER SPEEDS. DON'T FUCKING DO IT. \n\nahem thank you for your time, please don't screw over billions of people so you can buy your 5th house. :)","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2022.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10128620320574","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"filers":[{"name":"Dahn Haven"}],"date_submission":"2022-01-28T18:42:36.471Z","date_disseminated":"2022-01-28T22:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981928,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":0,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981898,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2022-01-28T18:42:36.471Z","text_data":"unable to enter comments","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2022.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"121591230216","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"filers":[{"name":"Wendy Oden"}],"date_submission":"2021-12-15T03:32:02.053Z","date_disseminated":"2021-12-15T16:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981927,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":2,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981897,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-12-15T03:32:02.053Z","text_data":"I strongly support net neutrality backed by Title 2 oversight of ISPs.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.12","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"121389054272","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"filers":[{"name":"Scott B. Vickers"}],"date_submission":"2021-12-13T23:35:31.742Z","date_disseminated":"2021-12-14T16:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981926,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":1,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981896,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-12-13T23:35:31.742Z","text_data":"I strongly support net neutrality backed by Title 2 oversight of ISPs.  Net Neutrality is essential to the functions and liberty of the Internet as we know it today.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.12","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1127284922647","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:06.529Z","filers":[{"name":"ur mom"}],"date_submission":"2021-11-27T21:35:38.490Z","date_disseminated":"2021-11-29T18:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981925,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":3,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981895,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-11-29T14:00:03.000Z","text_data":"reinstate net neutrality and tell at&t to go fuck themselves","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.11","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1108219128682","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:04.918Z","filers":[{"name":"Milo Wakeman"}],"date_submission":"2021-11-08T19:51:50.390Z","date_disseminated":"2021-11-08T22:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981924,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":12,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981894,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-11-08T19:51:50.390Z","text_data":"Preserve Net Neutrality and Title Two!","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.11","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"110428600784","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:09.721Z","filers":[{"name":"Net Neutrality"},{"name":"Internet"},{"name":"ISPs"}],"date_submission":"2021-11-04T15:23:09.982Z","date_disseminated":"2021-11-04T19:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981923,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":11,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981893,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-11-04T15:23:09.982Z","text_data":"Preserve Net Neutrality","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.11","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"11042182710208","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:06.589Z","filers":[{"name":"Shannon Beck"}],"date_submission":"2021-11-04T03:50:27.411Z","date_disseminated":"2021-11-04T15:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981922,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":10,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981892,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-11-04T03:50:27.411Z","text_data":"I am concerned about the repeal of the Open Internet Order in 2017. I back strong Net Neutrality, backed by Title II oversight of ISPs.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.11","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10251253314601","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:44.473Z","filers":[{"name":"Joh Tester"}],"date_submission":"2021-10-25T16:33:17.145Z","date_disseminated":"2021-10-25T19:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-10-25T16:33:17.145Z","text_data":"Test message body","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"102363508120","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:37.119Z","filers":[{"name":"sarah a sayer"}],"date_submission":"2021-10-23T15:25:18.381Z","date_disseminated":"2021-10-25T17:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981920,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":9,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981890,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-10-25T13:00:03.000Z","text_data":"I strongly support net neutrality backed by Title 2 oversight of ISPs.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10213000628498","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:44.472Z","filers":[{"name":"First Name - Test Last Name - Test"}],"date_submission":"2021-10-21T14:42:48.072Z","date_disseminated":"2021-10-21T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-10-21T14:42:48.072Z","text_data":"Test message body","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10211268327930","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:40.222Z","filers":[{"name":"First Name - Test Last Name - Test"}],"date_submission":"2021-10-21T14:44:00.481Z","date_disseminated":"2021-10-21T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-10-21T14:44:00.480Z","text_data":"Test message body","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1015972527772","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:38.541Z","filers":[{"name":"Fawn Cannon"}],"date_submission":"2021-10-15T19:27:29.820Z","date_disseminated":"2021-10-18T15:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981917,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":6,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981887,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-10-15T19:27:29.820Z","text_data":"NET NEUTRALITY IS IMPORTANT.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"FCC.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1015297141844/1","description":""}],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1015297141844","total_page_count":1,"lawfirms":[],"report_number":"2485685609","date_disseminated":"2021-10-15T19:00:02.000Z","@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981916,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":5,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981886,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"date_received":"2021-10-15T15:02:35.419Z","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":0,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:40.217Z","filers":[{"name":"Michael Greco"}],"date_submission":"2021-10-15T15:02:35.419Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Author","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10151096611313","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:44.412Z","filers":[{"name":"Alloni Kramer"}],"date_submission":"2021-10-15T02:38:01.600Z","date_disseminated":"2021-10-15T15:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981914,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":3,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981884,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-10-15T02:38:01.600Z","text_data":"“I strongly support net neutrality backed by Title 2 oversight of ISPs","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10152570208094","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:44.412Z","filers":[{"name":"April Porter"}],"date_submission":"2021-10-15T02:41:12.525Z","date_disseminated":"2021-10-15T15:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981914,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":3,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981884,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-10-15T02:41:12.525Z","text_data":"I strongly support net neutrality backed by Title 2 oversight of ISPs.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1014272675185","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:37.006Z","filers":[{"name":"Jennifer Gaffney"}],"date_submission":"2021-10-14T04:35:02.929Z","date_disseminated":"2021-10-14T17:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981913,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":2,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981883,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-10-14T13:00:03.000Z","text_data":"Net neutrality MUST be preserved. In a truly free economy, small businesses and start ups must have as much of a chance as large companies. All businesses start at some point and would want equal chances.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10122824723144","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:38.538Z","filers":[{"name":"Ian Light"}],"date_submission":"2021-10-12T19:40:07.173Z","date_disseminated":"2021-10-13T15:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981912,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":1,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981882,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-10-12T19:40:07.173Z","text_data":"I SUPPORT STRONG NET NEUTRALITY LAWS BACKED BY TITLE 2 OVERSIGHT BY ISP'S DON'T LET DONNY DO BAD THINGS WITH VERIZON!","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10030078111508","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:38.576Z","filers":[{"name":"James Broderick"}],"date_submission":"2021-10-03T15:49:59.144Z","date_disseminated":"2021-10-04T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981911,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":1,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981881,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-10-04T13:00:03.000Z","text_data":"I explicitly support Net Neutrality. We need a fair internet and we cannot trust the big firms","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1090425766098","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T21:58:37.702Z","filers":[{"name":"Don Kedick"}],"date_submission":"2021-09-04T13:54:14.661Z","date_disseminated":"2021-09-07T15:00:36.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981910,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":2,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981880,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-09-06T13:00:03.000Z","text_data":"SAVE NET NEUTRALITY MOTHERFUCKERS","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1080847140511","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:10.117Z","filers":[{"name":"ksnskd aodneid isbidhw uyaisbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-08-08T22:22:34.910Z","date_disseminated":"2021-08-09T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981908,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":3,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981878,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-08-09T13:00:03.000Z","text_data":"I’m ajit pie I like penis in my mouth \nPs. Put a nickel in my ass","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10809556022592","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:10.117Z","filers":[{"name":"Miranda Celinder"}],"date_submission":"2021-08-09T10:24:06.225Z","date_disseminated":"2021-08-09T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981909,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":3,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981878,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-08-09T13:00:03.000Z","text_data":"Preserve net neutrality and Title II. \nPlease. \nWe look at you from Denmark, and we are worried.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"107271552401503","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:15.399Z","filers":[{"name":"Karen Castro"}],"date_submission":"2021-07-27T23:28:00.096Z","date_disseminated":"2021-07-28T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981907,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":2,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981877,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-07-27T23:28:00.096Z","text_data":"Preserve Net Neutrality and title 2","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10724031428116","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:19.668Z","filers":[{"name":"Michael Tapper"}],"date_submission":"2021-07-24T00:26:45.450Z","date_disseminated":"2021-07-26T20:42:51.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-07-24T00:26:45.450Z","text_data":"This company misinformed me and broke an agreement to take payment instead sending my account to collections. This will take months to clear up, violated my terms not to mention an agreement to take payment and in the end leaves me unable to contact my family of seven.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10716198368905","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:13.809Z","filers":[{"name":"Yvonne George"}],"date_submission":"2021-07-16T15:47:45.209Z","date_disseminated":"2021-07-16T19:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-07-16T15:47:45.209Z","text_data":"I was a customer of Brighthouse, before Spectrum took over there customers, and since then it has been a nightmare dealing with this company.  I was told the they would grandfather me in to the same fee that brighthouse was charging me, but they dropped my bandwidth down so low that all I was getting was buffering all day long, my house phone is a run by my internet service, I was unable to make calls because of the low bandwidth.  I am a senior and not having my phone working was a scary moment for me. I called Spectrum and asked why my bandwidth was so low, and of course they wanted me to pay an extra $5 to upgrade my bandwidth speed,  At that point I was desperate to get my phone working in case of an emergency and I need some help. I agreed to the $5 increase, but that ended my fixed price of $54 being grandfathered in, but at least I had service for my phone and other electronic that required internet service would work.  Spectrum when they first came to my neighborhood was sending me bills, but then suddenly I received a letter telling me I had to pay them $1 for all paper bills.  I pay my bills on line, so I wasn't to upset about this new rule, I have paid $59 ever since, but recently I began to have the same problem with my band width and again my phone stopped working, but this time I had another choice of companies.  I hate this company so much that I just changed companies.\nWhen I called customer service to let them know that I was no longer a customer! I find out that they raised my rate, from $59 to $74 a month without notifying or sending me a letter about this change in price, I was told that I now owed $ over a hundred dollars.  This company is a cheat and now I am told that they on longer charge to send you paper bill's, what I would like to know is why didn't they have the courtesy to let me know of all these changes like rate change or paper bill me the information so I could make an informed decision as to what options I had.  NO BILL and NO NOTICE!\nI will not be paying this company a dime and I plan on tell the BBB about their practices, and the way they do seniors and customers.  I really would like to hear from you as to my rights in this matter and what I can legally do!  I thank you for time is this matter.\n\nYvonne George","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10623047420001","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:09.370Z","filers":[{"name":"David Tuttle"}],"date_submission":"2021-06-23T09:47:23.668Z","date_disseminated":"2021-06-23T17:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981904,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":10,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981874,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-06-23T13:00:05.000Z","text_data":"I strongly support net neutrality backed by title ii","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10612317825523","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:14.131Z","filers":[{"name":"internet"}],"date_submission":"2021-06-12T01:29:43.608Z","date_disseminated":"2021-06-14T15:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981903,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":9,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981873,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-06-12T01:29:43.607Z","text_data":"I support strong net neutrality","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"Free Press Ex Parte for June 9 2021 Meeting.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10610164067156/1","description":""}],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10610164067156","total_page_count":5,"lawfirms":[],"report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2021-06-11T15:00:03.000Z","@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":1012001693,"name":"10-90","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Connect America Fund A National Broadband Plan for Our Future High-Cost  Universal Service Support. .","description_display":"In the Matter of Connect America Fund A National Broadband Plan for Our Future High-Cost  Universal Service Support. .","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012101904,"name":"11-10","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Reform of the FCC Form 477 Data Program. Development of Nationwide Broadband   Data to Evaluate reasonable and Timely Deployment of advanced services to all Americans   improvement of wireless Broadband subscribership data. .","description_display":"In the Matter of Reform of the FCC Form 477 Data Program. Development of Nationwide Broadband   Data to Evaluate reasonable and Timely Deployment of advanced services to all Americans   improvement of wireless Broadband subscribership data. .","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"301945","name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"2019071194432","name":"19-195","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Establishing the Digital Opportunity Data Collection","description_display":"Establishing the Digital Opportunity Data Collection","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"20201231298403","name":"20-445","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Emergency Broadband Benefit Program","description_display":"Emergency Broadband Benefit Program","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"2020081930282","name":"20-269","bureau_code":"GN","description":"Inquiry Concerning Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion","description_display":"Inquiry Concerning Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion","bureau_name":"General (Multiple Bureaus)"}],"date_received":"2021-06-10T22:40:38.623Z","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":0,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:06.260Z","filers":[{"name":"Free Press"}],"date_submission":"2021-06-10T22:40:38.623Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"GS","name":"Office of Commissioner Geoffrey Starks","edocs_bureau_code":"OCGS","id":220}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"S. Derek Turner"}],"_index":"filings.2021.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"106101546729315","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:11.987Z","filers":[{"name":"Priya Chaudhari"},{"name":"Ashish Chaudhari"},{"name":"Hiraben Chaudhari"},{"name":"Krishna Chaudhari"},{"name":"Ansh Chaudhari"}],"date_submission":"2021-06-10T17:08:20.717Z","date_disseminated":"2021-06-10T21:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981901,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":7,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981871,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-06-10T17:08:20.717Z","text_data":"I support strong net neutrality backed by Title II oversight of ISPs.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10608111976094","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:09.535Z","filers":[{"name":"Karen Wisser"}],"date_submission":"2021-06-08T20:39:01.999Z","date_disseminated":"2021-06-09T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"","name":"17-108"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-06-08T20:39:01.999Z","text_data":"I am writing today to encourage you to work together and move quickly on a permanent legislative fix to preserve an open internet that is transparent and free from blocking, censorship and discriminatory throttling. I believe only legislation can ensure we have permanent, enforceable open internet rules that apply equally to everyone and won’t change depending on which party is in power or who is running the FCC. \n\nThe FCC’s move to make sure the internet isn’t subject to heavy-handed laws created for the rotary phone is the right first step, but only legislation can put this issue beyond politics and ensure that vital consumer protections are stable and secure. \n\nAfter almost two decades of the FCC and the courts arguing this issue—it’s time for Congress to provide permanent and strong open internet protections to consumers and the entire internet community.","_index":"filings.2021.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"106081388914524","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:09.535Z","filers":[{"name":"Derek Carlisle"}],"date_submission":"2021-06-08T19:15:00.588Z","date_disseminated":"2021-06-09T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981899,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":6,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981869,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-06-08T19:15:00.588Z","text_data":"I highly support strongly internet neutrality title 2 oversite of ISP's","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"2021.06.07 Accessibility Advocacy and Research Organizations Omnibus Accessibility Comments final.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/106082300102808/1","description":""}],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"106082300102808","total_page_count":81,"lawfirms":[{"name":"Samuelson-Glushko Technology Law & Policy Clinic (TLPC) at Colorado Law"},{"name":"Communications and Technology Law Clinic (CTLC) at Georgetown Law"}],"date_disseminated":"2021-06-08T15:00:06.000Z","@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"20210407206282","bureau_code":"GN","name":"21-140","description":"Consumer and Governmental Affairs, Media, and Wireless Telecommunications Bureaus Seek Update on Commission's Fulfillment of the Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act","description_display":"Consumer and Governmental Affairs, Media, and Wireless Telecommunications Bureaus Seek Update on Commission's Fulfillment of the Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act","bureau_name":"General (Multiple Bureaus)"},{"id_proceeding":1007200825,"bureau_code":"CG","name":"03-123","description":"Telecommunication Relay Services and Speech-to-Speech Services for Individuals with Hearing  and Speech Disabilities.","description_display":"Telecommunication Relay Services and Speech-to-Speech Services for Individuals with Hearing  and Speech Disabilities.","bureau_name":"Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureaus"},{"id_proceeding":1010600846,"bureau_code":"CG","name":"05-231","description":"In the Matter of Closed Captioning of Video Programming Telecommunications for the   Deaf, Inc. Petition for Rulemaking.","description_display":"In the Matter of Closed Captioning of Video Programming Telecommunications for the   Deaf, Inc. Petition for Rulemaking.","bureau_name":"Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureaus"},{"id_proceeding":1012001645,"bureau_code":"CG","name":"10-51","description":"In the Matter of Structure and Practices of the Video Relay Service Program. .","description_display":"In the Matter of Structure and Practices of the Video Relay Service Program. .","bureau_name":"Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureaus"},{"id_proceeding":1012001827,"bureau_code":"CG","name":"10-210","description":"Implementation of the Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act.","description_display":"Implementation of the Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act.","bureau_name":"Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureaus"},{"id_proceeding":1012001830,"bureau_code":"CG","name":"10-213","description":"Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau and Wireless Telecommunications Bureau seek   comment on advanced communication provisions of the Twenty-First Century Communications   and Video Accessibility Act of 2010.","description_display":"Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau and Wireless Telecommunications Bureau seek   comment on advanced communication provisions of the Twenty-First Century Communications   and Video Accessibility Act of 2010.","bureau_name":"Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureaus"},{"id_proceeding":1012202594,"bureau_code":"CG","name":"13-24","description":"Misuse of Internet Protocol (P) Captioned Telephone Service","description_display":"Misuse of Internet Protocol (P) Captioned Telephone Service","bureau_name":"Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureaus"},{"id_proceeding":1012903849,"bureau_code":"CG","name":"16-145","description":"Transition from TTY to Real-Time Text Technology","description_display":"Transition from TTY to Real-Time Text Technology","bureau_name":"Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureaus"},{"id_proceeding":"2019090561461","bureau_code":"CG","name":"RM-11848","description":"Telecommunications for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing, Inc. (TDI) et al. Petition for Declaratory Ruling and/or Rulemaking on Live Closed Captioning Quality Metrics and the Use of Automatic Speech Recognition Technologies","description_display":"Telecommunications for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing, Inc. (TDI) et al. Petition for Declaratory Ruling and/or Rulemaking on Live Closed Captioning Quality Metrics and the Use of Automatic Speech Recognition Technologies","bureau_name":"Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureaus"},{"id_proceeding":"20200227038754","bureau_code":"OEA","name":"20-60","description":"Office of Economics and Analytics Seeks Comment on the State of Competition in the Communications Marketplace","description_display":"Office of Economics and Analytics Seeks Comment on the State of Competition in the Communications Marketplace","bureau_name":"Office of Economics And Analytics"},{"id_proceeding":1012503091,"bureau_code":"GN","name":"14-28","description":"Protecting and Promoting the Open Internet","description_display":"Protecting and Promoting the Open Internet","bureau_name":"General (Multiple Bureaus)"},{"id_proceeding":1012703556,"bureau_code":"GN","name":"15-178","description":"Petition For Rulemaking To Update The Commission's Rules For Access To Support The Transition From TTY To Real-Time Text Technology, And Petition For Waiver Of Rules Requiring Support Of TTY Technology","description_display":"Petition For Rulemaking To Update The Commission's Rules For Access To Support The Transition From TTY To Real-Time Text Technology, And Petition For Waiver Of Rules Requiring Support Of TTY Technology","bureau_name":"General (Multiple Bureaus)"},{"id_proceeding":1012903845,"bureau_code":"GN","name":"16-142","description":"Media Bureau Seeks Comment on Joint Petition for Rulemaking of APTS, AWARN Alliance, CTA, and NAB Seeking to Authorize Permissive Use of The ?Next Generation TV? Broadcast Television Standard","description_display":"Media Bureau Seeks Comment on Joint Petition for Rulemaking of APTS, AWARN Alliance, CTA, and NAB Seeking to Authorize Permissive Use of The ?Next Generation TV? Broadcast Television Standard","bureau_name":"General (Multiple Bureaus)"},{"id_proceeding":1012101945,"bureau_code":"MB","name":"11-43","description":"In the Matter of Video Description: implementation of the Twenty-First Century Communications and   Video Accessiblity Act of 2010.","description_display":"In the Matter of Video Description: implementation of the Twenty-First Century Communications and   Video Accessiblity Act of 2010.","bureau_name":"Media Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012102078,"bureau_code":"MB","name":"11-154","description":"Closed Captioning of Internet Protocol-Delivered Video Programming","description_display":"Closed Captioning of Internet Protocol-Delivered Video Programming","bureau_name":"Media Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"20190226944633","bureau_code":"MB","name":"18-202","description":"MB Opens Docket for Children's Television Programming Rules","description_display":"MB Opens Docket for Children's Television Programming Rules","bureau_name":"Media Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012202266,"bureau_code":"MB","name":"12-107","description":"MEDIA BUREAU AND CONSUMER AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS BUREAU SEEK COMMENT ON SECOND VPAAC REPORT: VIDEO DESCRIPTION AND ACCESS TO EMERGENCY INFORMATION","description_display":"MEDIA BUREAU AND CONSUMER AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS BUREAU SEEK COMMENT ON SECOND VPAAC REPORT: VIDEO DESCRIPTION AND ACCESS TO EMERGENCY INFORMATION","bureau_name":"Media Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012202267,"bureau_code":"MM","name":"12-108","description":"MEDIA BUREAU AND CONSUMER AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS BUREAU SEEK COMMENT ON SECOND VPAAC REPORT: USER INFERFACES, AND VIDEO PROGRAMMING GUIDES AND MENUS","description_display":"MEDIA BUREAU AND CONSUMER AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS BUREAU SEEK COMMENT ON SECOND VPAAC REPORT: USER INFERFACES, AND VIDEO PROGRAMMING GUIDES AND MENUS","bureau_name":"MM"},{"id_proceeding":"301756","bureau_code":"MB","name":"17-105","description":"Modernization of Media Regulation Initiative","description_display":"Modernization of Media Regulation Initiative","bureau_name":"Media Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012101873,"bureau_code":"PS","name":"10-255","description":"In the Matter of Framework for Next Generation 911 Deployment.","description_display":"In the Matter of Framework for Next Generation 911 Deployment.","bureau_name":"Public Safety & Homeland Security Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012102077,"bureau_code":"PS","name":"11-153","description":"In the Matter of Facilitating the deployment of Text-to-911 and other NG911 applications.   Framework for Next Generation 911 deployment .","description_display":"In the Matter of Facilitating the deployment of Text-to-911 and other NG911 applications.   Framework for Next Generation 911 deployment .","bureau_name":"Public Safety & Homeland Security Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012703461,"bureau_code":"PS","name":"15-91","description":"Wireless Emergency Alerts","description_display":"Wireless Emergency Alerts","bureau_name":"Public Safety & Homeland Security Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012703542,"bureau_code":"PS","name":"15-94","description":"Amendment of Part 11 of the Commission?s Rules Regarding the Emergency Alert System","description_display":"Amendment of Part 11 of the Commission?s Rules Regarding the Emergency Alert System","bureau_name":"Public Safety & Homeland Security Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012101944,"bureau_code":"WC","name":"11-42","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline competition bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012202567,"bureau_code":"WC","name":"12-375","description":"Rates for Interstate Inmate Calling Services","description_display":"Rates for Interstate Inmate Calling Services","bureau_name":"Wireline competition bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"301759","bureau_code":"WC","name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline competition bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"2020010957691","bureau_code":"WTB","name":"20-3","description":"Amendment of the Commission's Rules Governing Standards for Hearing Aid-Compatible Handsets","description_display":"Amendment of the Commission's Rules Governing Standards for Hearing Aid-Compatible Handsets","bureau_name":"Wireless Telecommunications Bureau"}],"date_received":"2021-06-08T02:29:17.427Z","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":0,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:19.589Z","filers":[{"name":"Telecommunications for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing, Inc. (TDI)"},{"name":"American Association of the DeafBlind (AADB)"},{"name":"American Deafness and Rehabilitation Association (ADARA)"},{"name":"Association of Late-Deafened Adults (ALDA)"},{"name":"California Coalition of Agencies Serving the Deaf and Hard of Hearing (CCASDHH)"},{"name":"Cerebral Palsy and Deaf Organization (CPADO)"},{"name":"Communications Service for the Deaf (CSD)"},{"name":"Conference of Educational Administrators of Schools and Programs for the Deaf (CEASD)"},{"name":"Cuesign, Inc."},{"name":"Deaf Seniors of America (DSA)"},{"name":"Hearing Loss Association of America (HLAA)"},{"name":"HEARD"},{"name":"National Association of the Deaf (NAD)"},{"name":"National Black Deaf Advocates (NBDA)"},{"name":"National Cued Speech Association (NCSA)"},{"name":"National Hispanic Latino Association of the Deaf (NHLAD)"},{"name":"Northern Virginia Resource Center for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Persons (NVRC)"},{"name":"Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf (RID)"},{"name":"Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center on Technology for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing, Gallaudet University (DHH-RERC)"},{"name":"Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center on Universal Interface & Information Technology Access (IT-RERC)"},{"name":"Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center for Wireless Inclusive Technologies, Georgia Institute of Technology (Wireless RERC)"},{"name":"RIT/NTID Center on Access Technology (CAT)"}],"date_submission":"2021-06-08T02:29:17.427Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Law Firm","authors":[{"name":"Blake E. Reid"},{"name":"Laura Moy"}],"_index":"filings.2021.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1052630998730","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:20.797Z","filers":[{"name":"Chris Logan"}],"date_submission":"2021-05-26T19:44:21.684Z","date_disseminated":"2021-05-27T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981897,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":11,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981867,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-05-26T19:44:21.684Z","text_data":"Keep isp under sec. 2","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10525914311481","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:58.024Z","filers":[{"name":"Title II"},{"name":"Net Neutrality"}],"date_submission":"2021-05-25T16:05:24.856Z","date_disseminated":"2021-05-25T19:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981896,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":11,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981866,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-05-25T16:05:24.856Z","text_data":"I specifically support strong net neutrality backed by title II oversight of ISPs.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1052276055253","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:10.121Z","filers":[{"name":"William Schock"}],"date_submission":"2021-05-22T20:27:36.984Z","date_disseminated":"2021-05-24T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981894,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":10,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981864,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-05-24T13:00:03.000Z","text_data":"I support intense government oversight under title II to help keep net neutrality from creating another T Mobile/Verizon payment service called ISIS. Also Pi’s Reese’s mug is not infamous and he is a rich pompous jerk who should not have been allowed to watch the big Lebowski at a normal playing speed. He should have to watch it via slideshow.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10522128841552","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:16.501Z","filers":[{"name":"William Schock"}],"date_submission":"2021-05-22T20:25:58.229Z","date_disseminated":"2021-05-24T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981894,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":10,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981864,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-05-24T13:00:03.000Z","text_data":"I support intense government oversight under title II to help keep net neutrality from creating another T Mobile/Verizon payment service called ISIS.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10508209465316","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:16.498Z","filers":[{"name":"Robert Pierce"}],"date_submission":"2021-05-08T17:23:46.816Z","date_disseminated":"2021-05-10T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-05-10T13:00:03.000Z","text_data":"Hello,\n\nI'd just like to point out that all of the comments using my name (and probably the names of other people too) regarding the whole \"Internet Freedom\" business are clearly copy-pasted by either a bot or some skill-less, worthless fellow who was hired specifically to shill for companies that benefit from a lack of equitable regulation on the internet.\n\nTherefore, I'd recommend not listening to the comments any longer.\n\nNot that this comment really matters, since it's been quite a few years since this issue was at the forefront of the national consciousness and the damage is likely already done through the appointment of clearly corrupt peoples in key positions. But who knows?","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10505286518743","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:20.802Z","filers":[{"name":"Rene Loizou"}],"date_submission":"2021-05-05T12:16:07.427Z","date_disseminated":"2021-05-05T15:00:08.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981892,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":24,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981862,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-05-05T13:00:03.000Z","text_data":"I strongly support net neutrality backed by Title 2 oversight of ISPs.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10503276418514","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:20.800Z","filers":[{"name":"Jacob Reuter"}],"date_submission":"2021-05-03T21:03:41.880Z","date_disseminated":"2021-05-04T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981890,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":22,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981860,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-05-03T21:03:41.880Z","text_data":"Restore Net Neutrality. This is a fundamental right to the people as shown to be a utility need by the public during the pandemic.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1050350058611","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:10.838Z","filers":[{"name":"Logan Shelton"}],"date_submission":"2021-05-03T23:43:25.715Z","date_disseminated":"2021-05-04T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"","name":"17-108"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-05-03T23:43:25.715Z","text_data":"Our country has benefitted from the internet in many ways, and Americans have come to depend on an open internet and the crucial open internet principles of transparency, no blocking, no censorship and no discriminatory throttling. But, internet rules should not change each time a new political party takes office or a new person is appointed to lead the Federal Communications Commission.\n\nThat’s why I am writing to ask that you work together to preserve these crucial internet principles by creating legislation that codifies them into law. The FCC’s action to overturn the current law designed 80 years ago, before the Internet was created, is a great first step. However, legislation is the only way to permanently preserve the open internet principles that we rely on. \n\nThank you for working to keep the internet a place where all citizens can find new opportunities and communicate freely.","_index":"filings.2021.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1042949290778","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:46.669Z","filers":[{"name":"Philip Mathis"}],"date_submission":"2021-04-29T17:20:02.855Z","date_disseminated":"2021-04-29T21:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981889,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":21,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981858,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-04-29T17:20:02.855Z","text_data":"I specifically support strong net neutrality backed by title II oversight of ISP's","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1042943222188","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:42.722Z","filers":[{"name":"Kemerchyia Davis"}],"date_submission":"2021-04-29T15:17:47.229Z","date_disseminated":"2021-04-29T19:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-04-29T15:17:47.229Z","text_data":"Dear FCC Government Agency, why do we have to pay more money just for faster and better internet ? It should come with what’s provided. We shouldn’t have to have certain sites we can get on due to the fact that you guys are the owners and providers. We should have freedom to any sites , not just certain sites and others from elsewhere can use any site with their internet. I just feel that it isn’t fair. We have to pay extra money for better internet and all sites to be unlocked. It would be nice if y’all listen to our opinions and how we feel about this unfair situation. So basically if we pay for the internet and it’s slow in order for us to get a faster internet base we have to pay more ? I think that no matter how much the price is for the internet we should be able to have a strong connection and all sites shall be unlocked because we are paying y’all with our money , so we should get our just deserved. No hard feelings or anything but we don’t find that fair at all , I wrote this because hopefully y’all take our feelings about the situation into consideration that’s all.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1042714227234","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:41.293Z","filers":[{"name":"Jay"}],"date_submission":"2021-04-27T23:31:00.998Z","date_disseminated":"2021-04-28T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981887,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":21,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981857,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-04-27T23:31:00.998Z","text_data":"I support strong net neutrality backed by Title II oversight of ISps. Net neutrality is important.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"104262596128295","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:50.369Z","filers":[{"name":"emmanuel stoffel"}],"date_submission":"2021-04-26T18:51:23.023Z","date_disseminated":"2021-04-26T21:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-04-26T18:51:23.023Z","text_data":"Net Neutrality is the ability to go to any site that you please, and under no circumstances will there be restrictions on any websites. All information should be accessible to the public because we all deserve the truth; organizations and individuals shouldn’t be able to control the things that I want to watch, read, or research. Phone companies shouldn’t be able to make money off of services restrictions; making people pay more money for “faster” service. We shouldn’t have to pay all these fees because every little website has a restriction. No one should have to worry every time that they get on a website that it may restrict you from doing what you got to do.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1042534875972","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:58.965Z","filers":[{"name":"Aaliyah"}],"date_submission":"2021-04-25T01:09:14.319Z","date_disseminated":"2021-04-26T15:00:07.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-04-26T13:00:02.000Z","text_data":"Net Neutrality is important because it gives you the freedom of expression. What I mean by that is they let many diverse people in the world have a voice online for better or worse. Also, promoting innovation and competition. Everything is delivered as fast as possible to the end user. It’s also important because the FCC should keep the internet an equal playing field for everyone.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10423489300130","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:41.290Z","filers":[{"name":"Dontajah"}],"date_submission":"2021-04-23T18:42:27.529Z","date_disseminated":"2021-04-23T21:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-04-23T18:42:27.528Z","text_data":"Net Neutrality should be a thing known especially in this generation. Making the internet equal is nearly the best option mainly because people of every age use the internet. The Internet is a good educational tool even for adults and changing the speed would make things worse.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10422249581821","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:41.289Z","filers":[{"name":"Anonda Wilder"}],"date_submission":"2021-04-22T16:14:54.895Z","date_disseminated":"2021-04-22T19:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-04-22T16:14:54.895Z","text_data":"I feel like ISP shouldn’t have absolutely complete control over your internet in your home and everything. The grown up of the household should choose what should be blocked from their internet plan.The ISP also shouldn’t take advantage of how people use your internet, they are able to slow down people's internet and how fast websites work for people. People should be able to pay for faster internet without having to worry about someone being able to slow down or block you from a website.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"104213019118778","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:46.662Z","filers":[{"name":"Jada"}],"date_submission":"2021-04-21T04:10:57.636Z","date_disseminated":"2021-04-21T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-04-21T13:00:04.000Z","text_data":"The reason why Net Neutrality is good is because it plays an important role in developing peaceful, friendly and mutually beneficial relations between the countries of the world. People can also have freedom of expression like everyone should have. As long as it is legal, any blog or website or news service is available online under the concept of net neutrality. Net Neutrality squashes the potential for internet fast lanes, where internet service providers can charge content creators for enough bandwidth to deliver their service properly. It also prevents the possibility of providers charging end users an extra fee to access vital services, like online banking or email, or entertainment like gaming. It also has promotes innovation and competition which means its a level playing field on the internet, where everything is delivered as fast as possible to the end user. People all over the world can also show love and support to others.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"104200805630492","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:48.347Z","filers":[{"name":"Tawain Crawford"}],"date_submission":"2021-04-20T20:48:44.916Z","date_disseminated":"2021-04-21T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-04-20T20:48:44.916Z","text_data":"Net neutrality is good because it protects my right of freedom of expression . It also blocks the potential for internet “fast lanes''. There are also no additional costs for content. Net neutrality is bad because illicit content is widely available. It is also bad because nonone is paying for the data.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"104202606914981","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:41.287Z","filers":[{"name":"Drew Tennyson"}],"date_submission":"2021-04-20T20:31:47.107Z","date_disseminated":"2021-04-21T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-04-20T20:31:47.107Z","text_data":"Net neutrality is important. Don't let Comcast screw me over.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10421002092608","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:50.368Z","filers":[{"name":"Doretta young"}],"date_submission":"2021-04-21T01:27:39.048Z","date_disseminated":"2021-04-21T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-04-21T01:27:39.048Z","text_data":"Neutrality is good for the people","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1042032243166","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:50.368Z","filers":[{"name":"Timothy"},{"name":"Beverly-Davis"}],"date_submission":"2021-04-20T22:49:44.676Z","date_disseminated":"2021-04-21T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-04-20T22:49:44.675Z","text_data":"I think the internet should be free because the internet services slowing my internet down while playing the game with my friends would be bad. But it would make trying to spend time with my friends on the game frustrating.But also if there’s something for homework I have to do online on the internet then it might be hard for me to do it if my network is being run slower. Another thing is if there are more than 2 people in a household that are using the internet and it’s running slow then it would make the issues of not having net neutrality even worse.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10420016384544","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:48.347Z","filers":[{"name":"Damond Harris"}],"date_submission":"2021-04-20T14:50:51.421Z","date_disseminated":"2021-04-20T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-04-20T14:50:51.421Z","text_data":"In this world we are supposed to get treated equally in everything that goes on in our life everyday. Some simple things like the internet should be free because depending on where you stay,what user you are and content. Why do we have to pay through different price ranges if we all are basically on the same internet. It's ridiculous on some of the prices we are getting charged and we are with the same companies. The Internet should be free, everyone needs the internet to be connected with the world and some people don't have the money.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"104200071330261","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:50.367Z","filers":[{"name":"Damond Harris"}],"date_submission":"2021-04-20T14:50:51.389Z","date_disseminated":"2021-04-20T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-04-20T14:50:51.389Z","text_data":"In this world we are supposed to get treated equally in everything that goes on in our life everyday. Some simple things like the internet should be free because depending on where you stay,what user you are and content. Why do we have to pay through different price ranges if we all are basically on the same internet. It's ridiculous on some of the prices we are getting charged and we are with the same companies. The Internet should be free, everyone needs the internet to be connected with the world and some people don't have the money.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"104202272624055","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:48.347Z","filers":[{"name":"nakiyah"}],"date_submission":"2021-04-20T14:43:13.846Z","date_disseminated":"2021-04-20T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-04-20T14:43:13.846Z","text_data":"I believe that we shouldn’t let the FCC take control over the internet. If they take control over the internet that means they can control people's stuff and their phones and things like that. Like if somebody is on facebook and they think you are on there too long they can just turn yo whole facebook app off and stuff. That would be a disaster if they had the internet and was setting rules like you can only be on the internet for 1 hour that would really be a disaster. Like and some people can’t live without the internet, people wouldn’t have a clue what to do after the internet gets shut down for the day.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1042067528662","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:46.662Z","filers":[{"name":"Damond Harris"}],"date_submission":"2021-04-20T14:50:51.384Z","date_disseminated":"2021-04-20T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-04-20T14:50:51.384Z","text_data":"In this world we are supposed to get treated equally in everything that goes on in our life everyday. Some simple things like the internet should be free because depending on where you stay,what user you are and content. Why do we have to pay through different price ranges if we all are basically on the same internet. It's ridiculous on some of the prices we are getting charged and we are with the same companies. The Internet should be free, everyone needs the internet to be connected with the world and some people don't have the money.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"104200514423831","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:50.367Z","filers":[{"name":"Andrew Tennyson"}],"date_submission":"2021-04-20T14:41:03.232Z","date_disseminated":"2021-04-20T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-04-20T14:41:03.232Z","text_data":"I am strongly opposed to getting rid of net neutrality. ISPs should not be able to restrict access based on payment. There should be no slow and fast lane. Keep the internet equal for everyone.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1042003235464","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:48.346Z","filers":[{"name":"Quinn Enestvedt"}],"date_submission":"2021-04-20T04:51:02.214Z","date_disseminated":"2021-04-20T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981872,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":9,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981842,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-04-20T13:00:04.000Z","text_data":"Hi I just wanted to remind all of you that strong rules enforcing net neutrality is extremely important to me and pretty much everyone else. \nThat's all! Have a wonderful day and stay safe! :) \n\nPS If you're having a rough day, I've found that the Thoughts Of Dog Twitter account, which narrates a dog's thoughts on life- mostly on his stuffed animal Sebastian- is really wholesome and healing.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1041944164527","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:48.343Z","filers":[{"name":"*Emmanuel Nwufo"}],"date_submission":"2021-04-19T01:12:08.086Z","date_disseminated":"2021-04-19T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981871,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":8,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981841,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-04-19T13:00:04.000Z","text_data":"Please restore Net Neutrality and get your mouth out of cable and Internet company’s asshole","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1041566257258","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:48.336Z","filers":[{"name":"Taylor Clements"}],"date_submission":"2021-04-15T03:11:28.170Z","date_disseminated":"2021-04-15T15:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981870,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":9,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981840,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-04-15T03:11:28.170Z","text_data":"Title II net neutrality laws need to be upheld and strictly enforced. No one entity should even have a local monopoly of a particular area of internet coverage. Competition of ISPs should be encouraged and resistant to mergers.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"104130573210348","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:58.401Z","filers":[{"name":"Hugh Janus"}],"date_submission":"2021-04-13T21:14:55.103Z","date_disseminated":"2021-04-14T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981869,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":11,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981839,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-04-13T21:14:55.103Z","text_data":"Give us back net neutrality you corrupt pieces of human garbage. Thank you.\n\nSincerely,\nA concerned citizen who hates Ajit Pai","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10405032883780","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:38.414Z","filers":[{"name":"Lillian Weiland"}],"date_submission":"2021-04-05T00:51:04.871Z","date_disseminated":"2021-04-05T15:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981868,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":13,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981838,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-04-05T13:00:05.000Z","text_data":"I prefer and support net neutrality to stay strong and keep everything more fair for everyone.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.4","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"Lincoln Ex Parte Letter (with attachment).pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/103311123915673/1","description":""}],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"103311123915673","total_page_count":7,"lawfirms":[{"name":"Phillips Lytle, LLP"}],"date_disseminated":"2021-04-01T15:00:03.000Z","@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"2020080348501","name":"RM-11862","bureau_code":"CG","description":"Section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934","description_display":"Section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934","bureau_name":"Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2021-03-31T20:54:12.885Z","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":0,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:50.227Z","filers":[{"name":"Lincoln Network"}],"date_submission":"2021-03-31T20:54:12.885Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"JR","name":"Office of Acting Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel","edocs_bureau_code":"OCHJR","id":190},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"BC","name":"Office of Commissioner Brendan Carr","edocs_bureau_code":"OCBC","id":200},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"NS","name":"Office of Commissioner Nathan Simington","edocs_bureau_code":"OCNS","id":19099},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"GS","name":"Office of Commissioner Geoffrey Starks","edocs_bureau_code":"OCGS","id":220}],"entity":"Law Firm","authors":[{"name":"Joel Thayer"}],"_index":"filings.2021.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1032844815589","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:47.424Z","filers":[{"name":"Net neutrality"}],"date_submission":"2021-03-28T00:29:08.705Z","date_disseminated":"2021-03-29T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981866,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":15,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981836,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-03-29T13:00:05.000Z","text_data":"Bring net neutrality back and make it permanent!","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10325283173056","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:52.037Z","filers":[{"name":"Craig Cunningham"}],"date_submission":"2021-03-25T23:47:47.865Z","date_disseminated":"2021-03-26T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981865,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":16,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981835,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-03-25T23:47:47.865Z","text_data":"I fully support Net Neutrality - we need to adopt it via Congress, but we may have to settle for what the FCC can do until Congress makes new laws protecting Net Neutrality & limiting filtering and throttling by ISPs.  We should also limit data that ISPs can collect on an individual's use of an internet connection.  #Privacy","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10323021682822","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:47.411Z","filers":[{"name":"Shaquantae Mitchell"},{"name":"Samuel Boothe"},{"name":"Emma Marie Boothe"},{"name":"Gracie Mae Boothe"}],"date_submission":"2021-03-23T16:51:09.624Z","date_disseminated":"2021-03-23T19:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981864,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":15,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981834,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-03-23T16:51:09.624Z","text_data":"Restore internet freedom!","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1032055899561","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:52.035Z","filers":[{"name":"Adam Outler"}],"date_submission":"2021-03-20T00:43:17.469Z","date_disseminated":"2021-03-22T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-03-20T00:43:17.469Z","text_data":"Please ensure Net Neutrality is reenstated.  I am not a fan of having companies dictate what is important.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1031941723242","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:50.259Z","filers":[{"name":"Ashton Faul"}],"date_submission":"2021-03-19T04:58:27.334Z","date_disseminated":"2021-03-19T17:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981862,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":14,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981832,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-03-19T13:00:09.000Z","text_data":"Keep ISP's under Title 2. Save Net Neutrality please. Thank you","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1031838937062","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:46.477Z","filers":[{"name":"Kelley Quan McIntyre"}],"date_submission":"2021-03-18T00:57:40.099Z","date_disseminated":"2021-03-18T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981861,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":13,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981831,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-03-18T00:57:40.099Z","text_data":"I strongly support net neutrality backed by title 2 oversight of ISPs","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"103152717707247","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:46.476Z","filers":[{"name":"Steven Lott"}],"date_submission":"2021-03-15T05:46:19.644Z","date_disseminated":"2021-03-15T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"","name":"17-108"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-03-15T13:00:08.000Z","text_data":"The internet has been one of the greatest drivers of economic growth, job creation and innovation in our lifetimes. Unfortunately, the rules governing how the internet is regulated are largely being decided by whoever is the Chair of the FCC. I agree with the current FCC that the internet should not be regulated under a law created 80 years ago and that it creates uncertainty for internet users and the companies that invest billions of dollars into the internet economy. \n\nThe FCC’s move to get rid of the rules that unfairly and heavy-handedly enforced these principles is a necessary first step. But, now Congress needs to act so that open internet protections for consumers remain strong and consistent. I am writing today to encourage you to work with other members of Congress to pass bipartisan legislation that would codify the principles of transparency, no blocking, no censorship, and no discriminatory throttling and apply them to all internet companies. This is the best solution to provide the stability and certainty that the internet needs to continue thriving as it has for decades.","_index":"filings.2021.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10312968305537","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:43.248Z","filers":[{"name":"Ankit Agarwal"}],"date_submission":"2021-03-12T20:32:02.990Z","date_disseminated":"2021-03-15T15:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981858,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":10,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981828,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-03-12T20:32:02.990Z","text_data":"I support net neutrality and I don't want ISPs to be listed under title 2","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"103121335814705","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:50.258Z","filers":[{"name":"Kristen Palmer"}],"date_submission":"2021-03-12T21:57:50.707Z","date_disseminated":"2021-03-15T15:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981859,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":10,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981828,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-03-12T21:57:50.707Z","text_data":"I support Net neutrality and Tile 2.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10312546527268","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:52.034Z","filers":[{"name":"Gilroy Vasquez"}],"date_submission":"2021-03-12T06:20:42.598Z","date_disseminated":"2021-03-12T18:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"","name":"17-108"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-03-12T14:00:03.000Z","text_data":"Our country has benefitted from the internet in many ways, and Americans have come to depend on an open internet and the crucial open internet principles of transparency, no blocking, no censorship and no discriminatory throttling. But, internet rules should not change each time a new political party takes office or a new person is appointed to lead the Federal Communications Commission.\n\nThat’s why I am writing to ask that you work together to preserve these crucial internet principles by creating legislation that codifies them into law. The FCC’s action to overturn the current law designed 80 years ago, before the Internet was created, is a great first step. However, legislation is the only way to permanently preserve the open internet principles that we rely on. \n\nThank you for working to keep the internet a place where all citizens can find new opportunities and communicate freely.","_index":"filings.2021.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10310266641316","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:48.681Z","filers":[{"name":"jordan"}],"date_submission":"2021-03-10T03:04:50.375Z","date_disseminated":"2021-03-10T16:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981856,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":14,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981826,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-03-10T03:04:50.375Z","text_data":"Keep the internet neutral. Its the right thing to do","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1030668988188","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:51.288Z","filers":[{"name":"Jeremy Finn"}],"date_submission":"2021-03-06T13:47:28.321Z","date_disseminated":"2021-03-08T16:00:25.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981855,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":14,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981825,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-03-08T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"Keep the internet open and fair. Corporations are not people and do NOT need our help. Keeping it open and fair keeps competition healthy.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"103042842930637","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:50.253Z","filers":[{"name":"Brandon"}],"date_submission":"2021-03-04T18:47:09.941Z","date_disseminated":"2021-03-04T22:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981854,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":13,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981824,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-03-04T18:47:09.941Z","text_data":"I specifically support strong Net Neutrality backed by Title 2 oversight of ISP’s!!","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10301307445816","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:47.466Z","filers":[{"name":"James Stempien"}],"date_submission":"2021-03-01T18:04:00.547Z","date_disseminated":"2021-03-01T22:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981853,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":237,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981823,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-03-01T18:04:00.547Z","text_data":"Bring Back Strict Net Neutrality","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.3","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"103010967030791","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:17.552Z","filers":[{"name":"Alexander Jacqmin"}],"date_submission":"2021-03-01T04:15:50.212Z","date_disseminated":"2021-03-01T18:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981852,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":236,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981822,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-03-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"Bring back net neutrality.  This country is supposed to be a representative democracy. ONLY 13% OF THE COUNTRY AGREED THAT NET NEUTRALITY SHOULD BE REPEALED. The FCC did this in the name of corporate greed and you all know that.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.2","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1022680846568","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:15.034Z","filers":[{"name":"Andy Schutte"}],"date_submission":"2021-02-26T12:37:46.415Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-26T16:00:10.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981851,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":236,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981821,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-26T14:00:03.000Z","text_data":"Strong Title 2 Net Neutrality and removal of IPS Data caps should be priorities in our heavily digital world.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.2","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1022552158010","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:15.033Z","filers":[{"name":"Brittany Hoffacker"}],"date_submission":"2021-02-25T06:50:14.992Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-25T16:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"","name":"17-108"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-25T14:00:02.000Z","text_data":"I am writing in regard to the Commission’s work on preserving an open internet. There is no doubt that the internet has become a crucial part of our economy and way of life. That’s why it’s very important to regulate it in a responsible way.\n\nWhile I support the FCC’s work to get rid of the rules that were harming the internet economy, I believe the only way to permanently guarantee an open internet is by Congress creating a law that all companies must follow that promotes transparency and prevents blocking, censorship and discriminatory throttling. \n\nThank you for your continued work on this very important issue.","_index":"filings.2021.2","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION","short":"PET RECON","id":79,"abbreviation":"PR"},"attachments":[],"is_staff_upload":1,"documents":[{"filename":"Santa Clara County.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1022477612742/1","description":""}],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1022477612742","total_page_count":23,"lawfirms":[],"date_disseminated":"2021-02-24T17:45:04.376Z","@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"301945","name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2021-02-16T05:00:00.000Z","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"date_filed":"2021-02-16T05:00:00.000Z","express_comment":0,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:18.677Z","filers":[{"name":"Santa Clara County; et al"}],"date_submission":"2021-02-24T17:45:04.376Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"trackChanges":[{"user":"Alex.Mitro@fcc.gov","updated":"2021-02-24T17:45:04.361Z"}],"presented_to":[],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"James R. Williams"}],"_index":"filings.2021.2","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10219189907044","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:11.362Z","filers":[{"name":"Alexandra Stewart"}],"date_submission":"2021-02-19T02:36:20.353Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-19T16:00:08.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981848,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":239,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981818,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-19T02:36:20.353Z","text_data":"I would like to keep net neutrality as is.  No throttling.  Do not allow faster service for a higher price.  Net neutrality today, net neutrality tomorrow, net neutrality forever!  Thank you.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.2","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10210143410474","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:15.449Z","filers":[{"name":"People Person"}],"date_submission":"2021-02-10T06:04:03.573Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-10T18:00:07.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981847,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":243,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981817,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-10T14:00:08.000Z","text_data":"Restore Net Neutrality.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.2","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION","short":"PET RECON","id":79,"abbreviation":"PR"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"20210208_SantaClaraPetitionForReconsideration_NetNeutrality.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10209224471190/1","description":""}],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10209224471190","total_page_count":22,"lawfirms":[{"name":"Office of the County Counsel, County of Santa Clara"}],"date_disseminated":"2021-02-09T16:00:09.000Z","@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"301945","name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2021-02-09T00:16:09.466Z","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":0,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:17.557Z","filers":[{"name":"County of Santa Clara"},{"name":"Santa Clara County Central Fire Protection District"}],"date_submission":"2021-02-09T00:16:09.466Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Law Firm","authors":[{"name":"Raphael N. Rajendra"},{"name":"Meredith Johnson"},{"name":"James R. Williams"},{"name":"Phillip R. Malone"},{"name":"Jef Pearlman"}],"_index":"filings.2021.2","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION","short":"PET RECON","id":79,"abbreviation":"PR"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"Common Cause Benton UCC NHMC OTI FP Petition for Reconsideration 2-8-21.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10208276724468/1","description":""}],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10208276724468","total_page_count":9,"lawfirms":[],"date_disseminated":"2021-02-09T16:00:09.000Z","@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"301945","name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2021-02-08T23:49:20.725Z","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":0,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:13.345Z","filers":[{"name":"Common Cause"},{"name":"The Benton Institute for Broadband & Society"},{"name":"United Church of Christ, OC Inc."},{"name":"National Hispanic Media Coalition"},{"name":"New America's Open Technology Institute"},{"name":"Free Press"}],"date_submission":"2021-02-08T23:49:20.725Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Filer","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.2","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"20210208_SantaClaraPetitionForReconsideration_NetNeutrality.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10209353815067/1","description":""}],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10209353815067","total_page_count":22,"lawfirms":[{"name":"Office of the County Counsel, County of Santa Clara"}],"date_disseminated":"2021-02-09T16:00:09.000Z","@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"301945","name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2021-02-09T00:12:12.018Z","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":0,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:06.730Z","filers":[{"name":"County of Santa Clara"},{"name":"Santa Clara County Central Fire Protection District"}],"date_submission":"2021-02-09T00:12:12.018Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Law Firm","authors":[{"name":"Raphael N. Rajendra"},{"name":"Meredith Johnson"},{"name":"James R. Williams"},{"name":"Phillip R. Malone"},{"name":"Jef Pearlman"}],"_index":"filings.2021.2","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION","short":"PET RECON","id":79,"abbreviation":"PR"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"20210208_SantaClaraPetitionForReconsideration_NetNeutrality.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10209156227160/1","description":""}],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10209156227160","total_page_count":22,"lawfirms":[{"name":"Office of the County Counsel, County of Santa Clara"}],"date_disseminated":"2021-02-09T16:00:09.000Z","@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"301667","name":"17-20","bureau_code":"WTB","description":"AT&T Inc. and T-Mobile USA, Inc., Seek FCC Consent to the Assignment of Personal Communications Service and Advanced Wireless Services Licenses","description_display":"AT&T Inc. and T-Mobile USA, Inc., Seek FCC Consent to the Assignment of Personal Communications Service and Advanced Wireless Services Licenses","bureau_name":"Wireless Telecommunications Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2021-02-09T00:14:10.839Z","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":0,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:13.345Z","filers":[{"name":"County of Santa Clara"},{"name":"Santa Clara County Central Fire Protection District"}],"date_submission":"2021-02-09T00:14:10.839Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Law Firm","authors":[{"name":"Raphael N. Rajendra"},{"name":"Meredith Johnson"},{"name":"James R. Williams"},{"name":"Phillip R. Malone"},{"name":"Jef Pearlman"}],"_index":"filings.2021.2","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION","short":"PET RECON","id":79,"abbreviation":"PR"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"PK_NN_Remand_Petition_for_Recon.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10208005652256/1","description":""}],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10208005652256","total_page_count":7,"lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":0,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:10.291Z","filers":[{"name":"Public Knowledge"}],"date_submission":"2021-02-08T18:04:48.559Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-08T22:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"301945","name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-08T18:04:48.559Z","entity":"Filer","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.2","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION","short":"PET RECON","id":79,"abbreviation":"PR"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"INCOMPAS' Petition for Reconsideration (2.4.21).pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/102041071616733/1","description":""}],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"102041071616733","total_page_count":26,"lawfirms":[],"date_disseminated":"2021-02-04T22:00:05.000Z","@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981841,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":237,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981811,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"date_received":"2021-02-04T18:48:07.697Z","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":0,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:17.556Z","filers":[{"name":"INCOMPAS"}],"date_submission":"2021-02-04T18:48:07.697Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Filer","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.2","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1020153877380","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:17.553Z","filers":[{"name":"Brad"}],"date_submission":"2021-02-01T18:39:10.052Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T22:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981839,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":235,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981809,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T18:39:10.052Z","text_data":"I want net neutrality and to use the title II so that providers are forced to provide equal service regardless of what the service is.  They should not be allowed to choose favorites.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.2","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1020140439920","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:15.038Z","filers":[{"name":"FREEDOM"},{"name":"BACK"}],"date_submission":"2021-02-01T18:54:49.738Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T22:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981840,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":235,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981809,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T18:54:49.738Z","text_data":"GIVE ME MY FREEDOM BACK","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.2","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013125885055","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.668Z","filers":[{"name":"@@wF5FI elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:19:18.390Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013170116953","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.668Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:20:25.544Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131188115994","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.669Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:32:18.094Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131250247247","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.669Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:31:41.379Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101311752301427","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.669Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:50:20.948Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101311178700775","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.669Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:56:40.901Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"-1\" OR 2+759-759-1=0+0+0+1 -- ","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013194595697","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.613Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs 1'\""}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:09:26.326Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131486100020","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.613Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:30:01.771Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101311627602262","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.614Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:30:41.758Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131930615156","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.614Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:32:35.450Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101310977002805","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.614Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:35:24.894Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131613027445","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.669Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:04:50.898Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In%20the%20Matter%20of%20Restoring%20Internet%20Freedom%2c%20WC%20Docket%20No.%2017-108%0d%0a%20%0d%0aI%20am%20a%20writer%20and%20a%20member%20of%20the%20Writers%20Guild%20of%20America%20West%20(WGAW).%20I%20am%20submitting%20comments%20to%20express%20my%20strong%20support%20for%20the%20existing%20Open%20Internet%20Order.%20The%20Order%20has%20allowed%20the%20Internet%20to%20remain%20an%20open%20platform%20where%20consumers%2c%20rather%20than%20a%20few%20powerful%20gatekeepers%2c%20decide%20what%20content%20and%20information%20they%20want%20to%20access.%20By%20protecting%20the%20free%20market%20online%2c%20the%20Open%20Internet%20Order%20promotes%20free%20speech%2c%20competition%2c%20investment%20and%20innovation.%20%0d%0a%20%0d%0aThe%20Internet%20is%20a%20transformative%20platform%20for%20free%20speech%20and%20creative%20expression.%20The%20ability%20to%20bypass%20traditional%20gatekeepers%20and%20innovate%20without%20permission%20has%20enhanced%20competition%20and%20transformed%20industries.%20The%20news%2c%20information%20and%20entertainment%20offered%20online%20have%20driven%20broadband%20adoption%2c%20and%20the%20growth%20of%20online%20video%20in%20particular%20has%20driven%20demand%20for%20faster%20Internet%20speeds.%20Allowing%20Internet%20service%20providers%20(ISPs)%20to%20decide%20what%20content%20consumers%20can%20access%20and%20on%20what%20terms%20threatens%20this%20progress.%0d%0a%20%0d%0aFor%20content%20creators%2c%20the%20open%20Internet%20has%20been%20critically%20important.%20Faced%20with%20an%20increasingly%20consolidated%20industry%20where%20a%20handful%20of%20companies%20decide%20whose%20stories%20are%20told%2c%20the%20open%20Internet%20has%20brought%20forth%20new%20buyers%20and%20distribution%20outlets.%20Billions%20of%20dollars%20are%20invested%20each%20year%20in%20online%20video%20programming.%20In%20this%20year%20alone%2c%20WGAW%20members%20will%20write%20upwards%20of%20100%20original%20online%20series.%20%0d%0a%20%0d%0aBut%20this%20new%20market%20constitutes%20a%20competitive%20threat%20to%20the%20traditional%20media%20programmers.%20%20Without%20the%20current%20rules%2c%20distribution%20conglomerates%20would%20have%20the%20power%20to%20eliminate%20new%20competition.%20Under%20the%20proposed%20plan%2c%20we%20can%20expect%20the%20Internet%20to%20turn%20into%20cable%20television%2c%20with%20a%20few%20corporate%20gatekeepers%20controlling%20what%20content%20and%20information%20are%20available%20to%20consumers.%20The%20threat%20is%20not%20hypothetical:%20prior%20to%20the%202015%20rules%2c%20Comcast%2c%20Time%20Warner%20Cable%2c%20Verizon%20and%20AT%26amp;T%20degraded%20Netflix%e2%80%99s%20traffic%20even%20though%20their%20customers%20had%20paid%20to%20access%20the%20content%20and%20services%20of%20their%20choice.%0d%0a%20%0d%0aI%20strongly%20oppose%20the%20FCC%e2%80%99s%20proposal%20to%20rescind%20the%20Open%20Internet%20Order%20and%20to%20reclassify%20broadband%20Internet%20access%20service%20as%20a%20Title%20I%20information%20service.%20These%20actions%20will%20eliminate%20the%20FCC%e2%80%99s%20ability%20to%20enact%20and%20enforce%20rules%20that%20prevent%20discriminatory%20conduct%20or%20censorship%20by%20ISPs.%20The%20D.C.%20Circuit%20Court%20twice%20rejected%20the%20FCC%e2%80%99s%20open%20Internet%20rules%20when%20broadband%20was%20classified%20under%20Title%20I.%0d%0a%20%0d%0aI%20urge%20the%20FCC%20not%20to%20undermine%20the%20existing%20open%20Internet%20rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131177414246","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.669Z","filers":[{"name":"-1' OR 2+707-707-1=0+0+0+1 --  cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:10:15.418Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131012522940","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.669Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:09:24.578Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101313018420647","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.669Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:02:03.137Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131159409626","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.669Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:57:30.351Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"(select convert(int,CHAR(65)))","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131036013301","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.669Z","filers":[{"name":"y1Ed6tbo'); waitfor delay '0:0:8' --  cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:11:29.428Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101311496227719","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.280Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:30:58.769Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101312733305908","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.277Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:48:30.081Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131601321548","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.278Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:51:40.379Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101311404521528","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.278Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:59:46.739Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013154818202","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.278Z","filers":[{"name":"aDaAX4ST';select pg_sleep(17); --  cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:11:48.539Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131587904126","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.278Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs ?'?\""}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:11:28.470Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013198140506","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.279Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs JyI="}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:11:18.135Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013137442510","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.279Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:19:23.172Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131555505087","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.279Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:23:08.170Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131113463110","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.280Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:25:13.625Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131810030887","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.280Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:29:05.528Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131012701927","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.280Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:23:48.307Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101310983902694","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.787Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:18:30.136Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131198260652","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.787Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:21:49.422Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131021277738","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.787Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:23:59.354Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101312530730509","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.787Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:25:04.568Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131159561718","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.787Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:23:43.921Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131304616445","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.787Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:25:27.719Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013131970888","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.787Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:25:33.998Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131151609842","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.787Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:29:19.972Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131118765557","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.787Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:29:23.254Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101311556812198","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.788Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:54:17.695Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"?''?\"\"","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131340324300","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.788Z","filers":[{"name":"-1\" OR 2+933-933-1=0+0+0+1 --  cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:10:37.209Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131500505401","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.788Z","filers":[{"name":"JyI= elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:05:58.884Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131095596037","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:30.166Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:48:27.243Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013186463900","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:22.729Z","filers":[{"name":"1\u0000???? elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:05:07.507Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131111753179","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:23.368Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:55:06.188Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"\\","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013191719454","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:23.368Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:17:55.770Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131495512004","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:23.369Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:23:54.887Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131305056578","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:23.369Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:23:03.567Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013170247869","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:23.369Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:32:49.131Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101312998816580","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:22.718Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:49:18.146Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101311445615203","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.613Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq -1' OR 2+297-297-1=0+0+0+1 --"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:17:34.866Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131987818404","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:23.368Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq -1 OR 2+354-354-1=0+0+0+1 --"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:16:36.172Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131135780919","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:23.368Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq -1\" OR 2+950-950-1=0+0+0+1 --"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:17:48.564Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013125518980","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.668Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq RABy1ZDg"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:16:24.262Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013195642943","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.668Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:18:32.831Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013192084290","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.669Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:25:14.708Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013187014205","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.669Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:24:27.787Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101310564102238","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.669Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:23:39.090Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131019114183","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.669Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:34:12.940Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013114315788","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.669Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:35:07.109Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101312813709620","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.669Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:56:17.189Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"(select convert(int,CHAR(65)))","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101311398013707","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.617Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:50:00.429Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131474920682","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.617Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:49:19.306Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131212624949","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.613Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:02:14.509Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013136164024","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.613Z","filers":[{"name":"-1 OR 2+695-695-1=0+0+0+1 --  cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:09:58.265Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131988225462","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.613Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:22:02.551Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131434925077","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.613Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:20:27.769Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101310872130975","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.613Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:25:26.729Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101312557527701","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.613Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:29:31.386Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131943302028","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.669Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:56:11.124Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"-1 OR 2+218-218-1=0+0+0+1 -- ","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131220957950","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.669Z","filers":[{"name":"?'?\" elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:06:32.474Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101312358725855","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.670Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:54:01.176Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013188325246","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.787Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:20:33.771Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131130262186","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.787Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:24:20.315Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013193377541","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.787Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:25:08.391Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131156803971","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.787Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:22:50.507Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131231854094","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.787Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:24:51.569Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131345404019","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.787Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:35:25.946Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013124387995","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.787Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:28:37.404Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131495510324","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.788Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:35:53.157Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013170376239","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.788Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:52:43.936Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In%20the%20Matter%20of%20Restoring%20Internet%20Freedom%2c%20WC%20Docket%20No.%2017-108%0d%0a%20%0d%0aI%20am%20a%20writer%20and%20a%20member%20of%20the%20Writers%20Guild%20of%20America%20West%20(WGAW).%20I%20am%20submitting%20comments%20to%20express%20my%20strong%20support%20for%20the%20existing%20Open%20Internet%20Order.%20The%20Order%20has%20allowed%20the%20Internet%20to%20remain%20an%20open%20platform%20where%20consumers%2c%20rather%20than%20a%20few%20powerful%20gatekeepers%2c%20decide%20what%20content%20and%20information%20they%20want%20to%20access.%20By%20protecting%20the%20free%20market%20online%2c%20the%20Open%20Internet%20Order%20promotes%20free%20speech%2c%20competition%2c%20investment%20and%20innovation.%20%0d%0a%20%0d%0aThe%20Internet%20is%20a%20transformative%20platform%20for%20free%20speech%20and%20creative%20expression.%20The%20ability%20to%20bypass%20traditional%20gatekeepers%20and%20innovate%20without%20permission%20has%20enhanced%20competition%20and%20transformed%20industries.%20The%20news%2c%20information%20and%20entertainment%20offered%20online%20have%20driven%20broadband%20adoption%2c%20and%20the%20growth%20of%20online%20video%20in%20particular%20has%20driven%20demand%20for%20faster%20Internet%20speeds.%20Allowing%20Internet%20service%20providers%20(ISPs)%20to%20decide%20what%20content%20consumers%20can%20access%20and%20on%20what%20terms%20threatens%20this%20progress.%0d%0a%20%0d%0aFor%20content%20creators%2c%20the%20open%20Internet%20has%20been%20critically%20important.%20Faced%20with%20an%20increasingly%20consolidated%20industry%20where%20a%20handful%20of%20companies%20decide%20whose%20stories%20are%20told%2c%20the%20open%20Internet%20has%20brought%20forth%20new%20buyers%20and%20distribution%20outlets.%20Billions%20of%20dollars%20are%20invested%20each%20year%20in%20online%20video%20programming.%20In%20this%20year%20alone%2c%20WGAW%20members%20will%20write%20upwards%20of%20100%20original%20online%20series.%20%0d%0a%20%0d%0aBut%20this%20new%20market%20constitutes%20a%20competitive%20threat%20to%20the%20traditional%20media%20programmers.%20%20Without%20the%20current%20rules%2c%20distribution%20conglomerates%20would%20have%20the%20power%20to%20eliminate%20new%20competition.%20Under%20the%20proposed%20plan%2c%20we%20can%20expect%20the%20Internet%20to%20turn%20into%20cable%20television%2c%20with%20a%20few%20corporate%20gatekeepers%20controlling%20what%20content%20and%20information%20are%20available%20to%20consumers.%20The%20threat%20is%20not%20hypothetical:%20prior%20to%20the%202015%20rules%2c%20Comcast%2c%20Time%20Warner%20Cable%2c%20Verizon%20and%20AT%26amp;T%20degraded%20Netflix%e2%80%99s%20traffic%20even%20though%20their%20customers%20had%20paid%20to%20access%20the%20content%20and%20services%20of%20their%20choice.%0d%0a%20%0d%0aI%20strongly%20oppose%20the%20FCC%e2%80%99s%20proposal%20to%20rescind%20the%20Open%20Internet%20Order%20and%20to%20reclassify%20broadband%20Internet%20access%20service%20as%20a%20Title%20I%20information%20service.%20These%20actions%20will%20eliminate%20the%20FCC%e2%80%99s%20ability%20to%20enact%20and%20enforce%20rules%20that%20prevent%20discriminatory%20conduct%20or%20censorship%20by%20ISPs.%20The%20D.C.%20Circuit%20Court%20twice%20rejected%20the%20FCC%e2%80%99s%20open%20Internet%20rules%20when%20broadband%20was%20classified%20under%20Title%20I.%0d%0a%20%0d%0aI%20urge%20the%20FCC%20not%20to%20undermine%20the%20existing%20open%20Internet%20rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131057161881","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.788Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:49:24.875Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013176143337","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.788Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:53:49.811Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"JyI=","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101312692603524","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.788Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:09:36.817Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101312966822930","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.788Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:02:45.182Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131023617995","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.278Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:53:14.571Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101311536113979","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.278Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:00:19.302Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131795515005","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.278Z","filers":[{"name":"-1' OR 2+883-883-1=0+0+0+1 or '9lxltdFD'=' cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:10:22.931Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013187530392","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.278Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs \\"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:09:57.317Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101310051604554","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.278Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:18:35.796Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131389512001","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.279Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:17:49.559Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131102889533","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.279Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:16:00.998Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131242217118","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:22.729Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:52:59.439Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In%20the%20Matter%20of%20Restoring%20Internet%20Freedom%2c%20WC%20Docket%20No.%2017-108%0d%0a%20%0d%0aI%20am%20a%20writer%20and%20a%20member%20of%20the%20Writers%20Guild%20of%20America%20West%20(WGAW).%20I%20am%20submitting%20comments%20to%20express%20my%20strong%20support%20for%20the%20existing%20Open%20Internet%20Order.%20The%20Order%20has%20allowed%20the%20Internet%20to%20remain%20an%20open%20platform%20where%20consumers%2c%20rather%20than%20a%20few%20powerful%20gatekeepers%2c%20decide%20what%20content%20and%20information%20they%20want%20to%20access.%20By%20protecting%20the%20free%20market%20online%2c%20the%20Open%20Internet%20Order%20promotes%20free%20speech%2c%20competition%2c%20investment%20and%20innovation.%20%0d%0a%20%0d%0aThe%20Internet%20is%20a%20transformative%20platform%20for%20free%20speech%20and%20creative%20expression.%20The%20ability%20to%20bypass%20traditional%20gatekeepers%20and%20innovate%20without%20permission%20has%20enhanced%20competition%20and%20transformed%20industries.%20The%20news%2c%20information%20and%20entertainment%20offered%20online%20have%20driven%20broadband%20adoption%2c%20and%20the%20growth%20of%20online%20video%20in%20particular%20has%20driven%20demand%20for%20faster%20Internet%20speeds.%20Allowing%20Internet%20service%20providers%20(ISPs)%20to%20decide%20what%20content%20consumers%20can%20access%20and%20on%20what%20terms%20threatens%20this%20progress.%0d%0a%20%0d%0aFor%20content%20creators%2c%20the%20open%20Internet%20has%20been%20critically%20important.%20Faced%20with%20an%20increasingly%20consolidated%20industry%20where%20a%20handful%20of%20companies%20decide%20whose%20stories%20are%20told%2c%20the%20open%20Internet%20has%20brought%20forth%20new%20buyers%20and%20distribution%20outlets.%20Billions%20of%20dollars%20are%20invested%20each%20year%20in%20online%20video%20programming.%20In%20this%20year%20alone%2c%20WGAW%20members%20will%20write%20upwards%20of%20100%20original%20online%20series.%20%0d%0a%20%0d%0aBut%20this%20new%20market%20constitutes%20a%20competitive%20threat%20to%20the%20traditional%20media%20programmers.%20%20Without%20the%20current%20rules%2c%20distribution%20conglomerates%20would%20have%20the%20power%20to%20eliminate%20new%20competition.%20Under%20the%20proposed%20plan%2c%20we%20can%20expect%20the%20Internet%20to%20turn%20into%20cable%20television%2c%20with%20a%20few%20corporate%20gatekeepers%20controlling%20what%20content%20and%20information%20are%20available%20to%20consumers.%20The%20threat%20is%20not%20hypothetical:%20prior%20to%20the%202015%20rules%2c%20Comcast%2c%20Time%20Warner%20Cable%2c%20Verizon%20and%20AT%26amp;T%20degraded%20Netflix%e2%80%99s%20traffic%20even%20though%20their%20customers%20had%20paid%20to%20access%20the%20content%20and%20services%20of%20their%20choice.%0d%0a%20%0d%0aI%20strongly%20oppose%20the%20FCC%e2%80%99s%20proposal%20to%20rescind%20the%20Open%20Internet%20Order%20and%20to%20reclassify%20broadband%20Internet%20access%20service%20as%20a%20Title%20I%20information%20service.%20These%20actions%20will%20eliminate%20the%20FCC%e2%80%99s%20ability%20to%20enact%20and%20enforce%20rules%20that%20prevent%20discriminatory%20conduct%20or%20censorship%20by%20ISPs.%20The%20D.C.%20Circuit%20Court%20twice%20rejected%20the%20FCC%e2%80%99s%20open%20Internet%20rules%20when%20broadband%20was%20classified%20under%20Title%20I.%0d%0a%20%0d%0aI%20urge%20the%20FCC%20not%20to%20undermine%20the%20existing%20open%20Internet%20rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013170694262","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:23.367Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:01:56.851Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101310860008659","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:23.368Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:02:27.842Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101312826228838","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:23.368Z","filers":[{"name":"2xCiFlJt');select pg_sleep(25); --  cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:11:50.452Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131916110120","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:23.368Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:18:15.432Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131204775422","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:23.368Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:21:58.227Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013182809957","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:23.368Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:25:18.476Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131242547375","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:23.368Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:24:45.358Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013173713016","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:23.369Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:23:21.510Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101311802624087","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:22.718Z","filers":[{"name":"taiynuck bolxrumx"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:36:45.567Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131230720348","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.668Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:22:40.300Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131416031050","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.669Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:23:57.679Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131060406420","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.669Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:34:08.178Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131920215012","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.669Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:34:05.330Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101312475829184","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.669Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:31:32.246Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131537124516","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.613Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:59:38.740Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131084347648","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.613Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:00:38.614Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131112760160","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.613Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:03:30.810Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131242720354","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.613Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:03:27.087Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131996128933","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.613Z","filers":[{"name":"-1 OR 2+39-39-1=0+0+0+1 cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:10:05.083Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131344409332","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.613Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:24:54.124Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131098093148","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.613Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:20:02.850Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101310785118286","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.613Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:28:49.316Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101311247526183","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.613Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:28:42.625Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013169585095","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.613Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:29:04.122Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131215108749","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.669Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:02:35.837Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101312026930662","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.669Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq -1 OR 2+142-142-1=0+0+0+1"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:17:31.429Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131653705225","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.280Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:29:06.636Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131533716910","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.280Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:29:30.031Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013105574464","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.277Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:49:03.733Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013196356027","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.278Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:02:56.165Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101311169424117","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.278Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:56:18.718Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"-1 OR 2+511-511-1=0+0+0+1","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013172557946","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.278Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:53:29.866Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"1\u0000????","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131223122928","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.278Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:06:01.132Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131226307889","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.278Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs 1\u0000????"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:10:41.927Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131072521146","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.278Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq -1' OR 2+547-547-1=0+0+0+1 or 'vxDZDRHB'='"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:17:44.819Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131986212859","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.279Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:23:45.162Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131250109128","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.279Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:19:54.194Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131056360533","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.787Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:22:07.392Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131218208662","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.787Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:19:13.235Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131278237125","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.788Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:35:42.742Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013164151190","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.788Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:36:06.724Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101312496825001","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.788Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:02:22.882Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101312018127809","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.788Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:02:19.077Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131260025995","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.788Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:56:27.046Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"-1' OR 2+823-823-1=0+0+0+1 or 'faPWnBOD'='","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131099021225","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.788Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:15:10.986Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131940917540","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.788Z","filers":[{"name":"?''?\"\" elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:07:13.658Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013155846959","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:23.368Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:03:00.077Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013123484326","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:23.368Z","filers":[{"name":"1 waitfor delay '0:0:25' --  cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:12:16.591Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013121053081","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:23.368Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs (select convert(int,CHAR(65)))"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:11:49.452Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101312625004600","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:23.368Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:20:55.516Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013134811986","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:23.368Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:18:13.750Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131249302999","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:23.368Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:20:36.557Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013112033333","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:22.729Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:48:57.717Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013177904815","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.617Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:55:01.460Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In%20the%20Matter%20of%20Restoring%20Internet%20Freedom%2c%20WC%20Docket%20No.%2017-108%0d%0a%20%0d%0aI%20am%20a%20writer%20and%20a%20member%20of%20the%20Writers%20Guild%20of%20America%20West%20(WGAW).%20I%20am%20submitting%20comments%20to%20express%20my%20strong%20support%20for%20the%20existing%20Open%20Internet%20Order.%20The%20Order%20has%20allowed%20the%20Internet%20to%20remain%20an%20open%20platform%20where%20consumers%2c%20rather%20than%20a%20few%20powerful%20gatekeepers%2c%20decide%20what%20content%20and%20information%20they%20want%20to%20access.%20By%20protecting%20the%20free%20market%20online%2c%20the%20Open%20Internet%20Order%20promotes%20free%20speech%2c%20competition%2c%20investment%20and%20innovation.%20%0d%0a%20%0d%0aThe%20Internet%20is%20a%20transformative%20platform%20for%20free%20speech%20and%20creative%20expression.%20The%20ability%20to%20bypass%20traditional%20gatekeepers%20and%20innovate%20without%20permission%20has%20enhanced%20competition%20and%20transformed%20industries.%20The%20news%2c%20information%20and%20entertainment%20offered%20online%20have%20driven%20broadband%20adoption%2c%20and%20the%20growth%20of%20online%20video%20in%20particular%20has%20driven%20demand%20for%20faster%20Internet%20speeds.%20Allowing%20Internet%20service%20providers%20(ISPs)%20to%20decide%20what%20content%20consumers%20can%20access%20and%20on%20what%20terms%20threatens%20this%20progress.%0d%0a%20%0d%0aFor%20content%20creators%2c%20the%20open%20Internet%20has%20been%20critically%20important.%20Faced%20with%20an%20increasingly%20consolidated%20industry%20where%20a%20handful%20of%20companies%20decide%20whose%20stories%20are%20told%2c%20the%20open%20Internet%20has%20brought%20forth%20new%20buyers%20and%20distribution%20outlets.%20Billions%20of%20dollars%20are%20invested%20each%20year%20in%20online%20video%20programming.%20In%20this%20year%20alone%2c%20WGAW%20members%20will%20write%20upwards%20of%20100%20original%20online%20series.%20%0d%0a%20%0d%0aBut%20this%20new%20market%20constitutes%20a%20competitive%20threat%20to%20the%20traditional%20media%20programmers.%20%20Without%20the%20current%20rules%2c%20distribution%20conglomerates%20would%20have%20the%20power%20to%20eliminate%20new%20competition.%20Under%20the%20proposed%20plan%2c%20we%20can%20expect%20the%20Internet%20to%20turn%20into%20cable%20television%2c%20with%20a%20few%20corporate%20gatekeepers%20controlling%20what%20content%20and%20information%20are%20available%20to%20consumers.%20The%20threat%20is%20not%20hypothetical:%20prior%20to%20the%202015%20rules%2c%20Comcast%2c%20Time%20Warner%20Cable%2c%20Verizon%20and%20AT%26amp;T%20degraded%20Netflix%e2%80%99s%20traffic%20even%20though%20their%20customers%20had%20paid%20to%20access%20the%20content%20and%20services%20of%20their%20choice.%0d%0a%20%0d%0aI%20strongly%20oppose%20the%20FCC%e2%80%99s%20proposal%20to%20rescind%20the%20Open%20Internet%20Order%20and%20to%20reclassify%20broadband%20Internet%20access%20service%20as%20a%20Title%20I%20information%20service.%20These%20actions%20will%20eliminate%20the%20FCC%e2%80%99s%20ability%20to%20enact%20and%20enforce%20rules%20that%20prevent%20discriminatory%20conduct%20or%20censorship%20by%20ISPs.%20The%20D.C.%20Circuit%20Court%20twice%20rejected%20the%20FCC%e2%80%99s%20open%20Internet%20rules%20when%20broadband%20was%20classified%20under%20Title%20I.%0d%0a%20%0d%0aI%20urge%20the%20FCC%20not%20to%20undermine%20the%20existing%20open%20Internet%20rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101312636721517","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.613Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:55:51.293Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"(select convert(int,CHAR(65)))","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131260681221","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.613Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:55:26.031Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"(select convert(int,CHAR(65)))","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131068839214","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.613Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:54:11.898Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"?'?\"","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131054025098","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.613Z","filers":[{"name":"\\ elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:05:03.904Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013161897616","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.613Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:24:18.184Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013164033807","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.613Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:30:14.101Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101312331526860","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.614Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:34:11.570Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131725605286","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.668Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:22:00.765Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131134021526","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.669Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:25:37.474Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101311536108980","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.669Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:23:51.842Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013143409891","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.669Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:28:56.828Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131184417369","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.669Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:55:50.171Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"0Wk6HjCK","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013124045580","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.669Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:53:37.736Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"@@JufY2","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131187607767","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.669Z","filers":[{"name":"if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(8),0)/*'XOR(if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(8),0))OR'\"XOR(if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(8),0))OR\"*/ cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:10:40.935Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013187452986","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.669Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs \\"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:10:26.557Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131162439122","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.670Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:55:45.916Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In%20the%20Matter%20of%20Restoring%20Internet%20Freedom%2c%20WC%20Docket%20No.%2017-108%0d%0a%20%0d%0aI%20am%20a%20writer%20and%20a%20member%20of%20the%20Writers%20Guild%20of%20America%20West%20(WGAW).%20I%20am%20submitting%20comments%20to%20express%20my%20strong%20support%20for%20the%20existing%20Open%20Internet%20Order.%20The%20Order%20has%20allowed%20the%20Internet%20to%20remain%20an%20open%20platform%20where%20consumers%2c%20rather%20than%20a%20few%20powerful%20gatekeepers%2c%20decide%20what%20content%20and%20information%20they%20want%20to%20access.%20By%20protecting%20the%20free%20market%20online%2c%20the%20Open%20Internet%20Order%20promotes%20free%20speech%2c%20competition%2c%20investment%20and%20innovation.%20%0d%0a%20%0d%0aThe%20Internet%20is%20a%20transformative%20platform%20for%20free%20speech%20and%20creative%20expression.%20The%20ability%20to%20bypass%20traditional%20gatekeepers%20and%20innovate%20without%20permission%20has%20enhanced%20competition%20and%20transformed%20industries.%20The%20news%2c%20information%20and%20entertainment%20offered%20online%20have%20driven%20broadband%20adoption%2c%20and%20the%20growth%20of%20online%20video%20in%20particular%20has%20driven%20demand%20for%20faster%20Internet%20speeds.%20Allowing%20Internet%20service%20providers%20(ISPs)%20to%20decide%20what%20content%20consumers%20can%20access%20and%20on%20what%20terms%20threatens%20this%20progress.%0d%0a%20%0d%0aFor%20content%20creators%2c%20the%20open%20Internet%20has%20been%20critically%20important.%20Faced%20with%20an%20increasingly%20consolidated%20industry%20where%20a%20handful%20of%20companies%20decide%20whose%20stories%20are%20told%2c%20the%20open%20Internet%20has%20brought%20forth%20new%20buyers%20and%20distribution%20outlets.%20Billions%20of%20dollars%20are%20invested%20each%20year%20in%20online%20video%20programming.%20In%20this%20year%20alone%2c%20WGAW%20members%20will%20write%20upwards%20of%20100%20original%20online%20series.%20%0d%0a%20%0d%0aBut%20this%20new%20market%20constitutes%20a%20competitive%20threat%20to%20the%20traditional%20media%20programmers.%20%20Without%20the%20current%20rules%2c%20distribution%20conglomerates%20would%20have%20the%20power%20to%20eliminate%20new%20competition.%20Under%20the%20proposed%20plan%2c%20we%20can%20expect%20the%20Internet%20to%20turn%20into%20cable%20television%2c%20with%20a%20few%20corporate%20gatekeepers%20controlling%20what%20content%20and%20information%20are%20available%20to%20consumers.%20The%20threat%20is%20not%20hypothetical:%20prior%20to%20the%202015%20rules%2c%20Comcast%2c%20Time%20Warner%20Cable%2c%20Verizon%20and%20AT%26amp;T%20degraded%20Netflix%e2%80%99s%20traffic%20even%20though%20their%20customers%20had%20paid%20to%20access%20the%20content%20and%20services%20of%20their%20choice.%0d%0a%20%0d%0aI%20strongly%20oppose%20the%20FCC%e2%80%99s%20proposal%20to%20rescind%20the%20Open%20Internet%20Order%20and%20to%20reclassify%20broadband%20Internet%20access%20service%20as%20a%20Title%20I%20information%20service.%20These%20actions%20will%20eliminate%20the%20FCC%e2%80%99s%20ability%20to%20enact%20and%20enforce%20rules%20that%20prevent%20discriminatory%20conduct%20or%20censorship%20by%20ISPs.%20The%20D.C.%20Circuit%20Court%20twice%20rejected%20the%20FCC%e2%80%99s%20open%20Internet%20rules%20when%20broadband%20was%20classified%20under%20Title%20I.%0d%0a%20%0d%0aI%20urge%20the%20FCC%20not%20to%20undermine%20the%20existing%20open%20Internet%20rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131230244377","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.280Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:29:56.935Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013145551777","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.280Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:31:54.519Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131279218615","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.787Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs @@eMjEJ"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:15:58.576Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013116965897","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.787Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:22:18.413Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131097159693","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.787Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:24:14.886Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131611902879","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.787Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:25:30.643Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131134720209","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.788Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:56:24.199Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"-1' OR 2+645-645-1=0+0+0+1 -- ","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131137934222","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.788Z","filers":[{"name":"lW7eX5ze'));select pg_sleep(0); --  cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:13:08.855Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131785209645","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.788Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:03:08.411Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013127229305","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.788Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:09:28.653Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101312552708059","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:30.166Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:48:38.815Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131041314745","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:30.166Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:49:22.126Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101311539706468","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.277Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:50:50.859Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013195414116","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.277Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:48:39.941Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013123800230","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.278Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:02:15.431Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131213930715","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.278Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:03:38.610Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131263314939","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.278Z","filers":[{"name":"@@wF5FI elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:05:49.144Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101311382825245","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.278Z","filers":[{"name":"1'\" elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:04:54.685Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131690816657","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.279Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:24:44.208Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101311934519649","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.280Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:20:04.755Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131549703268","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:22.729Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:02:12.182Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131228548774","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:23.368Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:52:46.337Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"1'\"","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131158611133","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:23.368Z","filers":[{"name":"YGUbqu5e cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:09:44.229Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131506111034","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:23.368Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:20:22.193Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101311072721253","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:23.369Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:31:08.220Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131306587383","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:23.369Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:35:57.423Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131141028081","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:22.718Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:50:26.210Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101311249310662","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.668Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:21:59.464Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101313067524916","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:31.669Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:22:12.048Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101312393906334","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.618Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:50:59.701Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013191968573","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.613Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:53:22.034Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"\\","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101311682328004","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.613Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:02:53.627Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131296600532","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.613Z","filers":[{"name":"?'?\" elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:06:48.710Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131055314194","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.613Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:22:43.696Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013139066135","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.613Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:22:11.090Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013146655994","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.613Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:24:41.483Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013197869534","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.613Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:17:59.836Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131185908745","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.613Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:25:11.365Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013177131540","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.614Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:30:16.507Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131817721570","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.614Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:32:14.903Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131223750899","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.280Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:50:05.809Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013111407010","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.278Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:02:23.833Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131670020423","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.278Z","filers":[{"name":"(select convert(int,CHAR(65))) elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:07:19.957Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013165036460","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.278Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs @@eMjEJ"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:11:15.741Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131662604617","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.278Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs ?''?\"\""}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:11:33.129Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101312048729828","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.280Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:25:15.830Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101310683823207","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.787Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:18:38.343Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101310998223336","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.787Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:25:07.394Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131214155820","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.787Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:30:45.533Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013187205601","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.788Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:29:53.471Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013164514071","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:26.788Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq -1 OR 2+142-142-1=0+0+0+1"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:17:37.532Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013184369840","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:30.166Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T17:48:31.145Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013129693002","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:23.368Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:04:48.477Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101312070008254","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:23.368Z","filers":[{"name":"VgLBK7Qh')); waitfor delay '0:0:25' --  cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:11:44.866Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131162515892","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:23.368Z","filers":[{"name":"kGlvmwbx'; waitfor delay '0:0:17' --  cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:11:25.967Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131381125109","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:23.368Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:10:32.107Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1013145213799","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:23.368Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:14:15.433Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131142793048","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:23.368Z","filers":[{"name":"elxijqbs elxijqbs"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:19:55.545Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101310078106234","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:23.368Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:32:24.988Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10131184606136","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:23.369Z","filers":[{"name":"cxvfgeuq cxvfgeuq"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-31T18:28:36.003Z","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T18:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":301759,"name":"17-108","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-02-01T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108\r\n \r\nI am a writer and a member of the Writers Guild of America West (WGAW). I am submitting comments to express my strong support for the existing Open Internet Order. The Order has allowed the Internet to remain an open platform where consumers, rather than a few powerful gatekeepers, decide what content and information they want to access. By protecting the free market online, the Open Internet Order promotes free speech, competition, investment and innovation. \r\n \r\nThe Internet is a transformative platform for free speech and creative expression. The ability to bypass traditional gatekeepers and innovate without permission has enhanced competition and transformed industries. The news, information and entertainment offered online have driven broadband adoption, and the growth of online video in particular has driven demand for faster Internet speeds. Allowing Internet service providers (ISPs) to decide what content consumers can access and on what terms threatens this progress.\r\n \r\nFor content creators, the open Internet has been critically important. Faced with an increasingly consolidated industry where a handful of companies decide whose stories are told, the open Internet has brought forth new buyers and distribution outlets. Billions of dollars are invested each year in online video programming. In this year alone, WGAW members will write upwards of 100 original online series. \r\n \r\nBut this new market constitutes a competitive threat to the traditional media programmers.  Without the current rules, distribution conglomerates would have the power to eliminate new competition. Under the proposed plan, we can expect the Internet to turn into cable television, with a few corporate gatekeepers controlling what content and information are available to consumers. The threat is not hypothetical: prior to the 2015 rules, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon and AT&amp;T degraded Netflix�s traffic even though their customers had paid to access the content and services of their choice.\r\n \r\nI strongly oppose the FCC�s proposal to rescind the Open Internet Order and to reclassify broadband Internet access service as a Title I information service. These actions will eliminate the FCC�s ability to enact and enforce rules that prevent discriminatory conduct or censorship by ISPs. The D.C. Circuit Court twice rejected the FCC�s open Internet rules when broadband was classified under Title I.\r\n \r\nI urge the FCC not to undermine the existing open Internet rules.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"Acting Chairwoman Rosenworcel Final Ex Parte Notice (Jan 27, 2021).pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/101300368904033/1","description":"Joint Ex Parte Meeting with Acting Chairwoman Rosenworcel"}],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101300368904033","total_page_count":8,"lawfirms":[],"report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2021-02-01T16:00:05.000Z","@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"20201231298403","name":"20-445","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Emergency Broadband Benefit Program","description_display":"Emergency Broadband Benefit Program","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"2019071194432","name":"19-195","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Establishing the Digital Opportunity Data Collection","description_display":"Establishing the Digital Opportunity Data Collection","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"301945","name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"301733","name":"17-84","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Accelerating Wireline Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment","description_display":"Accelerating Wireline Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012903814,"name":"16-106","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Protecting the Privacy of Customers of Broadband and Other Telecommunications Services","description_display":"Protecting the Privacy of Customers of Broadband and Other Telecommunications Services","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012402761,"name":"13-184","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Modernizing the E-rate Program for Schools and Libraries.","description_display":"Modernizing the E-rate Program for Schools and Libraries.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012202567,"name":"12-375","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Rates for Interstate Inmate Calling Services","description_display":"Rates for Interstate Inmate Calling Services","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012101904,"name":"11-10","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Reform of the FCC Form 477 Data Program. Development of Nationwide Broadband   Data to Evaluate reasonable and Timely Deployment of advanced services to all Americans   improvement of wireless Broadband subscribership data. .","description_display":"In the Matter of Reform of the FCC Form 477 Data Program. Development of Nationwide Broadband   Data to Evaluate reasonable and Timely Deployment of advanced services to all Americans   improvement of wireless Broadband subscribership data. .","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"301793","name":"17-142","bureau_code":"GN","description":"Improving Competitive Broadband Access to Multiple Tenant Environments","description_display":"Improving Competitive Broadband Access to Multiple Tenant Environments","bureau_name":"General (Multiple Bureaus)"},{"id_proceeding":1006400939,"name":"02-278","bureau_code":"CG","description":"Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991","description_display":"Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991","bureau_name":"Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"20190228553732","name":"18-295","bureau_code":"OET","description":"Unlicensed Use of the 6 GHz Band","description_display":"Unlicensed Use of the 6 GHz Band","bureau_name":"Office of Engineering & Technology"},{"id_proceeding":"20200131266353","name":"20-31","bureau_code":"MB","description":"Implementation of Section 1003 of the Television Viewer Protection Act of 2019","description_display":"Implementation of Section 1003 of the Television Viewer Protection Act of 2019","bureau_name":"Media Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"20190228553788","name":"18-349","bureau_code":"MB","description":"2018 Quadrennial Regulatory Review","description_display":"2018 Quadrennial Regulatory Review","bureau_name":"Media Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012703484,"name":"15-80","bureau_code":"PS","description":"New Part 4 of the Commission's Rules Concerning Disruptions to Communications","description_display":"New Part 4 of the Commission's Rules Concerning Disruptions to Communications","bureau_name":"Public Safety and Homeland Security"},{"id_proceeding":1012703290,"name":"14-174","bureau_code":"PS","description":"Ensuring Customer Premises Equipment Backup Power for Continuity of Communications","description_display":"Ensuring Customer Premises Equipment Backup Power for Continuity of Communications","bureau_name":"Public Safety and Homeland Security"},{"id_proceeding":"2019112102754","name":"19-348","bureau_code":"WTB","description":"In the Matter of Facilitating Shared Use in the 3.1-3.55 GHz Band","description_display":"In the Matter of Facilitating Shared Use in the 3.1-3.55 GHz Band","bureau_name":"Wireless Telecommunications Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"302148","name":"18-120","bureau_code":"WTB","description":"Transforming the 2.5 GHz Band","description_display":"Transforming the 2.5 GHz Band","bureau_name":"Wireless Telecommunications Bureau"}],"date_received":"2021-01-30T03:06:29.465Z","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":0,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:20.277Z","filers":[{"name":"Media Justice, Civil Rights, Public Interest, Labor, and Consumer Advocacy Organizations"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-30T03:06:29.466Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"JR","name":"Office of Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel","edocs_bureau_code":"OCJR","id":190}],"entity":"Author","authors":[{"name":"Matthew F. Wood"}],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10126035600111","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:22.711Z","filers":[{"name":"Javier Anderson"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-26T21:12:23.073Z","date_disseminated":"2021-01-27T16:00:08.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981615,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":16,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981585,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-01-26T21:12:23.073Z","text_data":"I would like to express my view that Net Neutrality is crucial in today's information age. We must ensure that information and access to it remain free as a public good. By putting road tolls on peoples access to the internet and the world wide web, we create a two tiered system rather than an open free way for all. This cannot stand. Revoking Net Neutrality would only exacerbate long standing inequities and create further division between those with easy access and those without. Now more than ever, we need to instill the value that information, like that at the library or in a school, is available to all upon request. No onerous or confiscatory barriers should be set up in the information highway. Thank you","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10125181987852","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:25.885Z","filers":[{"name":"Nguyen Thuy"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-25T20:36:17.401Z","date_disseminated":"2021-01-26T16:00:07.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"","name":"17-108"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-01-25T20:36:17.401Z","text_data":"Our country has benefitted from the internet in many ways, and Americans have come to depend on an open internet and the crucial open internet principles of transparency, no blocking, no censorship and no discriminatory throttling. But, internet rules should not change each time a new political party takes office or a new person is appointed to lead the Federal Communications Commission.\n\nThat’s why I am writing to ask that you work together to preserve these crucial internet principles by creating legislation that codifies them into law. The FCC’s action to overturn the current law designed 80 years ago, before the Internet was created, is a great first step. However, legislation is the only way to permanently preserve the open internet principles that we rely on. \n\nThank you for working to keep the internet a place where all citizens can find new opportunities and communicate freely.","_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"One pager letter FCC priorities.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/101220821221344/1","description":"Ex Parte Letter"},{"filename":"Access Now FCC transition one-pager Jan 2021.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/101220821221344/2","description":"Access Now's Proposed 2021 Priorities One-Pager"}],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101220821221344","total_page_count":2,"lawfirms":[],"date_disseminated":"2021-01-22T22:00:09.000Z","@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301945","name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012001551,"name":"09-197","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Telecommunications Carriers Eligible to Receive Universal Service Support","description_display":"Telecommunications Carriers Eligible to Receive Universal Service Support","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"20201231298403","name":"20-445","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Emergency Broadband Benefit Program","description_display":"Emergency Broadband Benefit Program","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"2020080348501","name":"RM-11862","bureau_code":"CG","description":"Section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934","description_display":"Section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934","bureau_name":"Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"2020081930282","name":"20-269","bureau_code":"GN","description":"Inquiry Concerning Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion","description_display":"Inquiry Concerning Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion","bureau_name":"General (Multiple Bureaus)"},{"id_proceeding":"2019071194432","name":"19-195","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Establishing the Digital Opportunity Data Collection","description_display":"Establishing the Digital Opportunity Data Collection","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012101904,"name":"11-10","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Reform of the FCC Form 477 Data Program. Development of Nationwide Broadband   Data to Evaluate reasonable and Timely Deployment of advanced services to all Americans   improvement of wireless Broadband subscribership data. .","description_display":"In the Matter of Reform of the FCC Form 477 Data Program. Development of Nationwide Broadband   Data to Evaluate reasonable and Timely Deployment of advanced services to all Americans   improvement of wireless Broadband subscribership data. .","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012202208,"name":"12-52","bureau_code":"GN","description":"COMMISSION SEEKS COMMENTS ON CERTAIN WIRELESS SERVICE INTERRUPTIONS","description_display":"COMMISSION SEEKS COMMENTS ON CERTAIN WIRELESS SERVICE INTERRUPTIONS","bureau_name":"General (Multiple Bureaus)"},{"id_proceeding":1012402761,"name":"13-184","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Modernizing the E-rate Program for Schools and Libraries.","description_display":"Modernizing the E-rate Program for Schools and Libraries.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2021-01-22T18:29:21.262Z","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":0,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:19.434Z","filers":[{"name":"Access Now"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-22T18:29:21.262Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"BC","name":"Office of Commissioner Brendan Carr","edocs_bureau_code":"OCBC","id":200},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"GS","name":"Office of Commissioner Geoffrey Starks","edocs_bureau_code":"OCGS","id":220},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"JR","name":"Office of Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel","edocs_bureau_code":"OCJR","id":190},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"XX","name":"Others","edocs_bureau_code":"NA","id":80}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Eric Null"}],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10121052182916","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:14.888Z","filers":[{"name":"Cynthia"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-21T21:10:34.802Z","date_disseminated":"2021-01-22T16:00:08.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-01-21T21:10:34.802Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1012193099301","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:25.883Z","filers":[{"name":"Luke Hogsed"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-21T22:41:07.996Z","date_disseminated":"2021-01-22T16:00:08.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981612,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":12,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981581,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-01-21T22:41:07.996Z","text_data":"I am in support of strong net neutrality rules backed by Title II!","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101200134220386","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:17.503Z","filers":[{"name":"Bradley Drake"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-20T20:54:38.113Z","date_disseminated":"2021-01-21T16:00:08.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981609,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":10,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981579,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-01-21T20:54:38.113Z","text_data":"Oh man, I'm just so glad that Ajit Pai is gone forever. \n\nCongratulations!!! <3 \n\nI support Net Neutrality backed by Section II. \nHopefully the new head of the FCC does as well.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10120910823771","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:30.632Z","filers":[{"name":"Mackay"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-20T21:25:32.304Z","date_disseminated":"2021-01-21T16:00:08.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-01-21T21:25:32.304Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10119155677142","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:23.374Z","filers":[{"name":"Tim Cotter"},{"name":"Alisa Cody"},{"name":"Paul Cotter"},{"name":"Chris Cotter"},{"name":"Amy Hickey"},{"name":"Julie Conant"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-19T13:22:33.804Z","date_disseminated":"2021-01-19T18:00:07.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-01-19T14:00:06.000Z","text_data":"We all support Net Nuetrality. We can already see what's happening so fast and decicively. US citizens are literally being censored and their individual right to freedom of speech and expression being taken away without debate. This is the most un-American political movement in the history of our country, and the masses don't even know it's happening.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10112864728772","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:14.702Z","filers":[{"name":"Katherine Staser"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-12T18:27:10.901Z","date_disseminated":"2021-01-12T22:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-01-12T18:27:10.901Z","text_data":"I am registering a complaint because I believe repealing Net Neutrality will hurt American small businesses. It will stifle internet access for the poorer folks and rural communities. It will allow corporations to decide winners and losers instead of allowing the market to decide. Repealing Net Neutrality will hurt America and that is why I am registering this complaint. Thank you.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10111294001700","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:23.371Z","filers":[{"name":"Erin Yarrobino"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-11T17:30:57.677Z","date_disseminated":"2021-01-11T20:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-01-11T17:30:57.677Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10110197504078","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:14.689Z","filers":[{"name":"Net Neutrality"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-10T02:35:43.268Z","date_disseminated":"2021-01-11T18:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-01-11T14:00:07.000Z","text_data":"I am in support of net neutrality and do not want it to be ended.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101102925429110","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:23.371Z","filers":[{"name":"Noelle Amthor"}],"date_submission":"2021-01-10T02:09:47.854Z","date_disseminated":"2021-01-11T18:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981604,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":11,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981574,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2021-01-11T14:00:07.000Z","text_data":"I strongly support net neutrality backed by Title 2 oversight of ISPs.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2021.1","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1231003540765","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:21.857Z","filers":[{"name":"Elmo"}],"date_submission":"2020-12-31T10:05:34.356Z","date_disseminated":"2020-12-31T18:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981602,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":17,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981571,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-12-31T14:00:03.000Z","text_data":"Keep the internet fair you corporate shill with a stupid mug and and a blind ass dentist.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.12","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1231254171408","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:27.423Z","filers":[{"name":"Elmo"}],"date_submission":"2020-12-31T10:05:34.590Z","date_disseminated":"2020-12-31T18:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981602,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":17,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981571,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-12-31T14:00:03.000Z","text_data":"Keep the internet fair you corporate shill with a stupid mug and and a blind ass dentist.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.12","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"OTHER","short":"OTHER","id":117,"abbreviation":"OT"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"BestAcademy_MoneyAtoZ_Guidebook.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1230951407563/1","description":""}],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1230951407563","total_page_count":27,"lawfirms":[],"report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2020-12-31T16:00:03.000Z","@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2020-12-30T22:13:47.342Z","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":0,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.254Z","filers":[{"name":"Scott Alan Turner"}],"date_submission":"2020-12-30T22:13:47.342Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Author","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.12","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1227217240551","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:24.519Z","filers":[{"name":"James Sloan"}],"date_submission":"2020-12-27T14:07:10.473Z","date_disseminated":"2020-12-28T18:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981600,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":20,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981569,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-12-28T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"Internet should  be open and free. ISPs should not have the ability to control our usage because a company pays them money to prioritize.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.12","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1225122705408","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:24.519Z","filers":[{"name":"meow"},{"name":"meowmeow"}],"date_submission":"2020-12-25T13:42:44.342Z","date_disseminated":"2020-12-28T18:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981599,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":22,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981569,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-12-28T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"MEOW MEOW MEOWMEOWMEOW. MEEOOOOW MEOW MEOW","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.12","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"12180942112267","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:13.324Z","filers":[{"name":"Hannelore Kramolowski"}],"date_submission":"2020-12-18T00:25:00.200Z","date_disseminated":"2020-12-18T16:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"","name":"17-108"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-12-18T00:25:00.200Z","text_data":"Our country has benefitted from the internet in many ways, and Americans have come to depend on an open internet and the crucial open internet principles of transparency, no blocking, no censorship and no discriminatory throttling. But, internet rules should not change each time a new political party takes office or a new person is appointed to lead the Federal Communications Commission.\n\nThat’s why I am writing to ask that you work together to preserve these crucial internet principles by creating legislation that codifies them into law. The FCC’s action to overturn the current law designed 80 years ago, before the Internet was created, is a great first step. However, legislation is the only way to permanently preserve the open internet principles that we rely on. \n\nThank you for working to keep the internet a place where all citizens can find new opportunities and communicate freely.","_index":"filings.2020.12","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"121631039997","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:21.017Z","filers":[{"name":"17-108"}],"date_submission":"2020-12-16T20:05:33.609Z","date_disseminated":"2020-12-17T16:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981597,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":27,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981567,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-12-16T20:05:33.609Z","text_data":"I support net neutrality and title 2. I do not believe major companies have the right to make their competitors’: websites, applications, software, etc slower. This goes against our fundamental beliefs in the US by destroying the invisible hand of which we try to protect. Unfortunately our government is corrupt and enforce a flawed capitalist society (one without the invisible hand) that the majority of citizens do not benefit from. Since we live in a world where the internet is the core, I will protect it from: Comcast, Verizon, T-Mobile etc from continuing a doctrine of flawed capitalism in this nation.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.12","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1213559924183","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:24.512Z","filers":[{"name":"VictoriaPotter"}],"date_submission":"2020-12-13T00:17:27.992Z","date_disseminated":"2020-12-14T18:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981594,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":26,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981564,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-12-14T14:00:03.000Z","text_data":"Support net neutrality! FCC must stop appeasing ISPs at the cost of every citizen's internet use.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.12","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"121348499009","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:13.227Z","filers":[{"name":"Anup Nair"}],"date_submission":"2020-12-13T07:46:44.646Z","date_disseminated":"2020-12-14T18:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981595,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":26,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981564,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-12-14T14:00:03.000Z","text_data":"FCC,\n\nI specifically support strong net neutrality backed by Title II oversight of ISPs. It will be a huge disservice to internet freedom if strong net neutrality is not supported.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.12","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1214373404356","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:29.635Z","filers":[{"name":"Brian Ross"}],"date_submission":"2020-12-14T10:05:20.168Z","date_disseminated":"2020-12-14T18:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981596,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":25,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981564,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-12-14T14:00:03.000Z","text_data":"I specifically support strong Net Neutrality, backed by Title 2 Oversight of ISP's.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.12","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1211198638316","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:24.512Z","filers":[{"name":"Griffin Mulcahy"}],"date_submission":"2020-12-11T14:51:58.820Z","date_disseminated":"2020-12-11T18:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981593,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":28,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981563,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-12-11T14:51:58.820Z","text_data":"Maintain free and open access through maintaining Internet Service Providers under the oversight of Title II regulations.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.12","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1204015474771","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:21.872Z","filers":[{"name":"Thomas Hall"}],"date_submission":"2020-12-04T20:09:31.304Z","date_disseminated":"2020-12-07T16:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981592,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":33,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981561,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-12-04T20:09:31.304Z","text_data":"Net neutrality should be as given as the 1st amendment.  Bring it back for the sake of the people of this nation.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.12","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1204275401899","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:29.633Z","filers":[{"name":"Christine Drummond"}],"date_submission":"2020-12-04T19:33:58.931Z","date_disseminated":"2020-12-04T22:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981591,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":33,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981561,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-12-04T19:33:58.931Z","text_data":"I support strong net neutrality backed by title 2 oversight of ISPs.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.12","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"120461079356","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:12.389Z","filers":[{"name":"David Boyd"}],"date_submission":"2020-12-04T02:09:29.139Z","date_disseminated":"2020-12-04T16:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-12-04T02:09:29.139Z","text_data":"Net Neutrality needs to be protected. ISPs should not be allowed to choose “good” and “bad” information.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.12","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1203511513805","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.268Z","filers":[{"name":"krystal paddock"}],"date_submission":"2020-12-03T00:40:33.794Z","date_disseminated":"2020-12-03T16:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981589,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":32,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981559,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-12-03T00:40:33.794Z","text_data":"Open and equal access to internet is essential to the average citizen. it is a gross misconduct of integrity to allow access to be manipulated.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.12","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"12021443118079","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:29.627Z","filers":[{"name":"Christopher Stogdill"}],"date_submission":"2020-12-02T03:40:33.182Z","date_disseminated":"2020-12-02T16:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981588,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":32,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981558,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-12-02T03:40:33.182Z","text_data":"Removing regulatory protection for Net Neutrality under the guise of \"freedom\" is a false premise. Just because there is no large-scale internet throttling by providers *now* is evidence that the current regulation is working, not a sign that it can be relaxed or eliminated. The regulations are there for protection and even if removed, just because something bad isn't happening it doesn't mean it cannot start up.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.12","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1201956120894","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:12.366Z","filers":[{"name":"Casey Booth"}],"date_submission":"2020-12-01T16:02:32.554Z","date_disseminated":"2020-12-01T20:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981587,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":28,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981554,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-12-01T16:02:32.554Z","text_data":"Bring back Net Neutrality and return it to Title II. Stop putting more power into hands of the corporations instead of the people, and pandering to political and corporate interests.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.12","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1201423310792","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.268Z","filers":[{"name":"sam hayslip"}],"date_submission":"2020-12-01T14:31:29.606Z","date_disseminated":"2020-12-01T18:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981586,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":28,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981554,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-12-01T14:31:29.606Z","text_data":"I support strong oversight under title 2 .","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.12","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"120145503943","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:15.434Z","filers":[{"name":"levi"}],"date_submission":"2020-12-01T02:13:10.966Z","date_disseminated":"2020-12-01T16:00:09.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981585,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":28,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981554,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-12-01T02:13:10.966Z","text_data":"Preserve net neutrality and title 2","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.11","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1130224442110","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:06.343Z","filers":[{"name":"Eric Shane Ralich"}],"date_submission":"2020-11-30T21:40:34.930Z","date_disseminated":"2020-12-01T16:00:09.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981584,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":26,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981552,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-11-30T21:40:34.930Z","text_data":"Dear FCC chair, I specifically support STRONG net neutrality backed by Title 2 oversight of ISPs. Stop trying to take freedom away from the people and putting it into the pockets of corporations. STRONGER NET NEUTRALITY backed with TITLE II oversight of ISP's","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.11","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"11300378302530","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:06.324Z","filers":[{"name":"Johnson"},{"name":"Webb"}],"date_submission":"2020-11-30T19:26:02.594Z","date_disseminated":"2020-11-30T22:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981582,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":25,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981551,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-11-30T19:26:02.594Z","text_data":"I strongly support Net neutralty backed by Title II oversight of internet providers.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.11","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"113027700884","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:13.866Z","filers":[{"name":"Alexander Jacqmin"}],"date_submission":"2020-11-30T19:48:52.123Z","date_disseminated":"2020-11-30T22:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981583,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":25,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981551,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-11-30T19:48:52.123Z","text_data":"Bring back net neutrality.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.11","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"11302910004230","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:08.991Z","filers":[{"name":"Rodney Cuthbertson"}],"date_submission":"2020-11-30T16:24:08.882Z","date_disseminated":"2020-11-30T20:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-11-30T16:24:08.882Z","text_data":"I support title to oversight of I SPS and I support net neutrality","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.11","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"11280837000709","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:11.753Z","filers":[{"name":"Marybel Archer"}],"date_submission":"2020-11-28T02:51:15.308Z","date_disseminated":"2020-11-30T16:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981580,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":33,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981550,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-11-28T02:51:15.308Z","text_data":"Quit selling Americans’ rights to the highest bidder!","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.11","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"112789895067","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:13.866Z","filers":[{"name":"Net Neutrality"}],"date_submission":"2020-11-27T07:58:54.023Z","date_disseminated":"2020-11-27T18:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981579,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":35,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981549,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-11-27T14:00:04.000Z","text_data":"Dear FCC chair, \nI specifically support STRONG net neutrality backed by Title 2 oversight of ISPs.  Stop trying to take freedom away from the people and putting it into the pockets of corporations.  S-T-R-O-N-G-E-R N-E-T N-E-U-T-R-A-L-I-T-Y backed with TITLE II oversight of ISP's.  Got it???","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.11","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"112551620507","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:15.433Z","filers":[{"name":"Karen Easton"}],"date_submission":"2020-11-25T05:02:59.670Z","date_disseminated":"2020-11-25T18:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981578,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":41,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981547,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-11-25T14:00:07.000Z","text_data":"I strongly support Net Neutrality, oppose tampering with Title II, and hope that issues such as equal access to communication and information are never limited only to those that can afford it.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.11","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"11242868906866","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:10.682Z","filers":[{"name":"Justin Perez"}],"date_submission":"2020-11-24T23:28:55.137Z","date_disseminated":"2020-11-25T16:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-11-24T23:28:55.137Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.11","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"11192663616364","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:08.986Z","filers":[{"name":"Michelle-Paulette B Backes & Ray McAllister"}],"date_submission":"2020-11-19T16:22:04.791Z","date_disseminated":"2020-11-19T20:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981576,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":48,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981546,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-11-19T16:22:04.791Z","text_data":"I support Strong net neutrality with title 2 regulating ISPs.  Stop rigging the game against average people for corporations. As far as I’m concerned the FCC shouldn’t even exist. You all should be ashamed of yourselves for the way you squash first amendment rights on the airwaves and are now trying to break and ruin the Internet. SHAME ON YOU!","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.11","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1118474404115","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:13.464Z","filers":[{"name":"Tom Langford"}],"date_submission":"2020-11-18T03:28:13.810Z","date_disseminated":"2020-11-18T16:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981575,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":50,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981545,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-11-18T03:28:13.810Z","text_data":"KEEP NET Neutral !","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.11","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1117139754143","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:08.985Z","filers":[{"name":"Don Johnson"}],"date_submission":"2020-11-17T19:46:19.713Z","date_disseminated":"2020-11-17T22:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-11-17T19:46:19.713Z","text_data":"restore net neutrality. ISPs are given too much power to control my access","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.11","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1117927017066","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:08.985Z","filers":[{"name":"Ole Peterson"}],"date_submission":"2020-11-17T19:49:12.073Z","date_disseminated":"2020-11-17T22:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-11-17T19:49:12.073Z","text_data":"Reinstate Net Neutrality. Need fair and open internet","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.11","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"11170432616624","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:13.454Z","filers":[{"name":"kerry Gillespie"}],"date_submission":"2020-11-17T09:24:31.543Z","date_disseminated":"2020-11-17T18:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981572,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":46,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981541,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-11-17T14:00:08.000Z","text_data":"I support strong neg neutralities backed by Title II oversight of ISPs.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.11","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"11171849826971","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:13.464Z","filers":[{"name":"Dave Alexander"}],"date_submission":"2020-11-17T00:36:08.187Z","date_disseminated":"2020-11-17T16:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981571,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":46,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981541,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-11-17T00:36:08.187Z","text_data":"I totally and fully support net neutrality.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.11","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1116233006518","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:06.232Z","filers":[{"name":"Kathy R Wooten"}],"date_submission":"2020-11-16T17:06:46.452Z","date_disseminated":"2020-11-16T20:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981570,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":44,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981539,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-11-16T17:06:46.452Z","text_data":"I (also known as “we-the-people”) support Net Neutrality - always have, always will.  Net Neutrality is nothing less than digital democracy. Additionally, Net Neutrality needs to be backed by Title II oversight of ISPs.  In case that wasn’t clear enough:  I STRONGLY support Net Neutrality backed by Title II oversight of ISPs.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.11","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1115090573434","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:14.915Z","filers":[{"name":"Ryan Haynes"}],"date_submission":"2020-11-15T01:45:38.389Z","date_disseminated":"2020-11-16T18:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981569,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":45,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981539,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-11-16T14:00:05.000Z","text_data":"I firmly support and want strong net neutrality backed by Title II oversight of ISPs.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.11","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1113240753572","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:09.943Z","filers":[{"name":"Todd Robertson"}],"date_submission":"2020-11-13T16:51:19.876Z","date_disseminated":"2020-11-13T20:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981568,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":48,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981538,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-11-13T16:51:19.876Z","text_data":"I support strong net neutrality backed by title 2 oversight of ISPs","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.11","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1111683514543","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:07.781Z","filers":[{"name":"Matthew Beaver"}],"date_submission":"2020-11-11T15:03:03.109Z","date_disseminated":"2020-11-12T18:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981565,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":49,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981535,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-11-12T14:00:05.000Z","text_data":"We need strong net neutrality","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.11","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"111107019116","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:07.781Z","filers":[{"name":"Adnaan Soorma"}],"date_submission":"2020-11-11T20:35:28.191Z","date_disseminated":"2020-11-12T18:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981566,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":49,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981535,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-11-12T14:00:05.000Z","text_data":"I support net neutrality backed by Title II oversight of ISPs including cellular operators","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.11","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"11122194428446","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:13.430Z","filers":[{"name":"Geoff Rogers"}],"date_submission":"2020-11-12T03:34:34.636Z","date_disseminated":"2020-11-12T16:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981567,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":49,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981535,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-11-12T03:34:34.636Z","text_data":"I support strong net neutrality backed by title II oversight of ISPs.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.11","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"111057429664","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:11.760Z","filers":[{"name":"Gofccyourself"}],"date_submission":"2020-11-10T19:14:04.699Z","date_disseminated":"2020-11-10T22:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981563,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":47,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981533,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-11-10T19:14:04.699Z","text_data":"What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little bitch? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I’ve been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills. I am trained in gorilla warfare and I’m the top sniper in the entire US armed forces. You are nothing to me but just another target. I will wipe you the fuck out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my fucking words. You think you can get away with saying that shit to me over the Internet? Think again, fucker. As we speak I am contacting my secret network of spies across the USA and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your life. You’re fucking dead, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can kill you in over seven hundred ways, and that’s just with my bare hands. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed combat, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the United States Marine Corps and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable ass off the face of the continent, you little shit. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little “clever” comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking tongue. But you couldn’t, you didn’t, and now you’re paying the price, you goddamn idiot. I will shit fury all over you and you will drown in it. You’re fucking dead, kiddo.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.11","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"111057516289","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:09.937Z","filers":[{"name":"Janessa Bowekaty"}],"date_submission":"2020-11-10T19:12:24.978Z","date_disseminated":"2020-11-10T22:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981563,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":47,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981533,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-11-10T19:12:24.978Z","text_data":"I am entirely in support of net neutrality. We need net neutrality in order to continue fair and proper regulation among service providers.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.11","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1109302655745","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:07.750Z","filers":[{"name":"Maria guevara"}],"date_submission":"2020-11-09T23:03:55.675Z","date_disseminated":"2020-11-10T16:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981561,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":45,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981531,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-11-09T23:03:55.675Z","text_data":"We support strong net neutrality tittle 2.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.11","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1110214267053","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:14.909Z","filers":[{"name":"Michael Wang"}],"date_submission":"2020-11-10T01:34:01.943Z","date_disseminated":"2020-11-10T16:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981562,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":45,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981531,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-11-10T01:34:01.943Z","text_data":"I support net neutrality under title  2 isp oversight","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.11","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1107111306286","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:11.759Z","filers":[{"name":"kenneth ruda"}],"date_submission":"2020-11-07T02:36:23.528Z","date_disseminated":"2020-11-09T16:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981560,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":45,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981530,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-11-07T02:36:23.528Z","text_data":"I support Net Neutrality","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.11","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1106304250483","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:09.935Z","filers":[{"name":"Bruce Schaller"}],"date_submission":"2020-11-06T18:40:13.766Z","date_disseminated":"2020-11-06T22:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981559,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":43,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981528,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-11-06T18:40:13.766Z","text_data":"I support strong net neutrality backed by Title 2 oversight of ISPs.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.11","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"110689059169","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:13.870Z","filers":[{"name":"Tori Oblad"}],"date_submission":"2020-11-06T18:05:19.719Z","date_disseminated":"2020-11-06T22:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981558,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":43,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981528,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-11-06T18:05:19.719Z","text_data":"I specifically support strong net neutrality backed by Title II oversight of ISP.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.11","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"11030373600715","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:10:11.757Z","filers":[{"name":"Ernesto Cantu"}],"date_submission":"2020-11-03T18:57:19.370Z","date_disseminated":"2020-11-03T22:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981557,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":48,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981527,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-11-03T18:57:19.370Z","text_data":"I strongly support the upholding and expansion of Title two","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.11","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1030276315427","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:24.629Z","filers":[{"name":"Hanna Mullen"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-30T21:40:53.589Z","date_disseminated":"2020-11-02T16:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981556,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":50,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981526,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-10-30T21:40:53.588Z","text_data":"preserve net neutrality and title 2","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1030029797269","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:18.008Z","filers":[{"name":"Eliseo Orellana"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-30T16:59:39.040Z","date_disseminated":"2020-10-30T19:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012903621,"name":"15-247","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Investigation of Certain Price Cap Local Exchange Carrier Business Data Services Tariff Pricing Plans","description_display":"Investigation of Certain Price Cap Local Exchange Carrier Business Data Services Tariff Pricing Plans","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-10-30T16:59:39.040Z","text_data":"Comcast has decided to limit customers in my area to 1TB of data. They say only 1% will be\naffected. I believe this data cap will definitely affect more people and is designed by Comcast to\nbenefit financially. They talk about principles of fairness, however it is well documented that Comcast\novercharges customers. This is another way for them to increase their already overpriced rates. I\ndon't see this as fair.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1030065924258","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:55.760Z","filers":[{"name":"David Williams III"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-30T07:53:35.667Z","date_disseminated":"2020-10-30T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981553,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":46,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981521,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-10-30T13:00:05.000Z","text_data":"I support strong net neutrality backed by Title II oversight of ISPs","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10301705804397","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:04.717Z","filers":[{"name":"Melanie Scharrer"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-30T04:08:44.674Z","date_disseminated":"2020-10-30T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981552,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":46,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981521,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-10-30T13:00:05.000Z","text_data":"I support strong net neutrality, supported by Title II oversight of ISPs.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10301712004957","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:12.429Z","filers":[{"name":"Megan Krout"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-30T07:51:02.409Z","date_disseminated":"2020-10-30T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981553,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":46,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981521,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-10-30T13:00:05.000Z","text_data":"I support strong net neutrality backed by Title II oversight of ISPs","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"103073423984","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:24.627Z","filers":[{"name":"Laura Jung"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-30T02:39:31.373Z","date_disseminated":"2020-10-30T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981551,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":46,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981521,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-10-30T02:39:31.373Z","text_data":"Preserve net neutrality and Title II - it essential for a truly open and competitive online landscape. This decision must not be left to lobbyist and monopolists.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1029711527827","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:55.746Z","filers":[{"name":"Anthony Pilowa"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-29T17:30:23.178Z","date_disseminated":"2020-10-29T21:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981549,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":44,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981519,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-10-29T17:30:23.178Z","text_data":"I support strong net neutrality regulations back by Title II oversight of ISPs.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"filingsCount":0,"flag_public":"Y","short":"OTHER","description":"OTHER","id":117,"type":"OT"},"is_staff_upload":0,"documents":[{"filename":"FCC-20-151A4.pdf","src":"https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-20-151A4.pdf","description":"Carr Statement"},{"filename":"FCC-20-151A6.pdf","src":"https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-20-151A6.pdf","description":"Starks Statement"},{"filename":"FCC-20-151A5.pdf","src":"https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-20-151A5.pdf","description":"Rosenworcel Statement"},{"filename":"FCC-20-151A3.pdf","src":"https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-20-151A3.pdf","description":"O'Rielly Statement"},{"filename":"FCC-20-151A1.pdf","src":"https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-20-151A1.pdf","description":""},{"filename":"FCC-20-151A2.pdf","src":"https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-20-151A2.pdf","description":"Pai Statement"}],"delegated_authority_number":"FCC-20-151","id_submission":"1029734608113","bureaus":[{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"}],"lawfirms":[{"name":"FCC"}],"bureau_id":"","date_comment_period":null,"file_number":"","admincomment":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2020-10-29T17:00:00.000Z","id_edocs":367856,"proceedings":[{"name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2020-10-29T17:00:00.000Z","reg_flex_analysis":"N","date_last_modified":"2022-12-06T19:57:22.000Z","small_business_impact":"N","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"fcc_record":"","date_reply_comment":null,"express_comment":0,"is_action":1,"exparte_or_late_filed":"N","filers":[{"name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-29T17:00:00.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"trackChanges":[{"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2020-10-30T16:20:01.812Z"},{"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2020-12-02T18:20:02.745Z"},{"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2020-12-04T15:50:03.584Z"},{"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2020-12-04T16:00:03.462Z"},{"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2020-12-04T16:20:03.510Z"},{"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2020-12-07T19:50:03.700Z"},{"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2020-12-07T21:20:03.756Z"},{"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2020-12-09T15:50:03.571Z"},{"changes":{},"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2022-12-06T15:05:38.008Z"}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"_index":"filings.actions.2020"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10283001604618","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:55.740Z","filers":[{"name":"jesus gonzalez"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-28T20:03:20.223Z","date_disseminated":"2020-10-29T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981547,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":43,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981516,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-10-28T20:03:20.223Z","text_data":"I support strong net neutrality","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1029105225301","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:22.574Z","filers":[{"name":"Taylor Simonette"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-29T00:45:22.127Z","date_disseminated":"2020-10-29T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981548,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":42,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981517,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-10-29T00:45:22.127Z","text_data":"I support net neutrality!!!","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1028078052876","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:12.130Z","filers":[{"name":"Jeffrey Hampton"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-28T18:10:10.676Z","date_disseminated":"2020-10-28T21:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981545,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":43,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981515,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-10-28T18:10:10.676Z","text_data":"Please protect and defend net neutrality! ISP providers should be regulated like a utility under title 2! The internet is as essential as electricity and water in this day and age! I can’t believe we are using regulation that was made when the internet was in its infancy!","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1028133014358","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:22.570Z","filers":[{"name":"Shane Dioneda"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-28T16:47:46.793Z","date_disseminated":"2020-10-28T19:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981545,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":43,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981515,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-10-28T16:47:46.793Z","text_data":"I strongly support net neutrality.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"102769168600","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:04.134Z","filers":[{"name":"Patricia Davis"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-27T19:25:11.513Z","date_disseminated":"2020-10-28T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-10-27T19:25:11.513Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10272924911349","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:19.713Z","filers":[{"name":"Jacob Thomas Williams"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-27T16:27:55.582Z","date_disseminated":"2020-10-27T19:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981541,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":39,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981511,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-10-27T16:27:55.582Z","text_data":"I strongly support net neutrality backed by title 2 oversight of ISP's","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"id_submission_type":117,"description":"OTHER","short":"OTHER","type":"OT"},"is_staff_upload":0,"documents":[{"filename":"DOC-367772A1.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1027294577215/1","description":"After Court Upheld Vast Majority of Restoring Internet Freedom Order, FCC Reviews Three Remanded Issues and Finds No Basis to Change Its Approach"},{"filename":"DOC-367772A3.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1027294577215/2","description":"After Court Upheld Vast Majority of Restoring Internet Freedom Order, FCC Reviews Three Remanded Issues and Finds No Basis to Change Its Approach"},{"filename":"DOC-367772A2.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1027294577215/3","description":"After Court Upheld Vast Majority of Restoring Internet Freedom Order, FCC Reviews Three Remanded Issues and Finds No Basis to Change Its Approach"},{"filename":"DOC-367772A4.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1027294577215/4","description":"After Court Upheld Vast Majority of Restoring Internet Freedom Order, FCC Reviews Three Remanded Issues and Finds No Basis to Change Its Approach"},{"filename":"DOC-367772A5.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1027294577215/5","description":"After Court Upheld Vast Majority of Restoring Internet Freedom Order, FCC Reviews Three Remanded Issues and Finds No Basis to Change Its Approach"},{"filename":"DOC-367772A6.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1027294577215/6","description":"After Court Upheld Vast Majority of Restoring Internet Freedom Order, FCC Reviews Three Remanded Issues and Finds No Basis to Change Its Approach"}],"delegated_authority_number":"","id_submission":"1027294577215","bureaus":[{"bureau_code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB","id":145}],"total_page_count":51,"lawfirms":[{"name":"FCC"}],"bureau_id":"","date_comment_period":null,"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2020-10-27T15:51:18.000Z","id_edocs":367772,"proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"301945","name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2020-10-27T15:51:18.000Z","date_last_modified":"2020-10-28T16:33:02.000Z","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"fcc_record":"","date_reply_comment":null,"express_comment":0,"is_action":1,"filers":[{"name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-27T15:51:18.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"trackChanges":[{"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2020-10-27T19:20:02.674Z"},{"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2020-10-27T19:30:01.967Z"},{"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2020-10-27T19:45:02.264Z"},{"user":"edocs.interface","updated":"2020-10-28T16:40:02.896Z"}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"_index":"filings.actions.2020","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"id_submission_type":117,"description":"OTHER","short":"OTHER","type":"OT"},"is_staff_upload":0,"documents":[{"filename":"DOC-367772A1.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1027272331199/1","description":"After Court Upheld Vast Majority of Restoring Internet Freedom Order, FCC Reviews Three Remanded Issues and Finds No Basis to Change Its Approach"}],"delegated_authority_number":"","id_submission":"1027272331199","bureaus":[{"bureau_code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB","id":145}],"total_page_count":2,"lawfirms":[{"name":"FCC"}],"bureau_id":"","date_comment_period":null,"file_number":"","report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2020-10-27T15:51:18.000Z","id_edocs":367772,"proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"301945","name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2020-10-27T15:51:18.000Z","date_last_modified":"2020-10-27T15:51:18.000Z","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":10},"fcc_record":"","date_reply_comment":null,"express_comment":0,"is_action":1,"filers":[{"name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-27T15:51:18.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"trackChanges":[],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"_index":"filings.actions.2020","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1027569903251","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:54.977Z","filers":[{"name":"Alison Stanton"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-27T00:36:21.066Z","date_disseminated":"2020-10-27T15:00:07.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981539,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":37,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981509,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-10-27T00:36:21.066Z","text_data":"I strongly support net neutrality. I have for years. I've talked to my congresspeople about it and I will continue to. Title II oversight of ISPs is critical to maintaining America.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1027139527335","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:04.134Z","filers":[{"name":"Liz Valenta"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-27T00:28:22.323Z","date_disseminated":"2020-10-27T15:00:07.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981539,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":37,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981509,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-10-27T00:28:22.323Z","text_data":"I urge the FCC to keep strong net neutrality rules backed by Title II","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1026092083071","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:04.133Z","filers":[{"name":"Peter Welsh"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-26T17:26:28.460Z","date_disseminated":"2020-10-26T21:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981538,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":36,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981508,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-10-26T17:26:28.460Z","text_data":"I support net neutrality","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10250509726225","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:17.352Z","filers":[{"name":"Brian Turner"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-25T18:01:18.145Z","date_disseminated":"2020-10-26T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981537,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":34,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981506,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-10-26T13:00:06.000Z","text_data":"I support strong net neutrality.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"102486686177","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:17.352Z","filers":[{"name":"Mary Frey"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-24T18:09:37.083Z","date_disseminated":"2020-10-26T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981536,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":37,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981506,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-10-26T13:00:06.000Z","text_data":"We demand fair net neutrality!","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"102271099163","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:10.933Z","filers":[{"name":"Halbert Conk"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-22T05:37:10.772Z","date_disseminated":"2020-10-22T17:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981535,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":39,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981504,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-10-22T13:00:08.000Z","text_data":"Net Neutrality","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"102174724249","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:15.741Z","filers":[{"name":"Alexander Morris"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-21T23:07:41.381Z","date_disseminated":"2020-10-22T15:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981534,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":39,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981504,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-10-21T23:07:41.380Z","text_data":"I support strong net neutrality backed by title II oversight of ISPs.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"LETTER","short":"LETTER","id":29,"abbreviation":"LT"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"Net Neutrality Letter Comments on FCC Proposed Order on Remand Submitted by the Broadband Institute of California @ SCU Law Final.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10210750909544/1","description":""}],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10210750909544","total_page_count":37,"lawfirms":[],"date_disseminated":"2020-10-21T17:00:02.000Z","@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"301945","name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2020-10-21T13:00:05.000Z","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":0,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:10.932Z","filers":[{"name":"Broadband Institute of California @ Santa Clara University School of Law"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-21T11:55:25.068Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Filer","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"USTelecom Ex Parte Docket Nos. 19-308 17-108 17-287 11-42 10.20.20.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1021488025161/1","description":""}],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1021488025161","total_page_count":3,"lawfirms":[],"report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2020-10-21T15:00:03.000Z","@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"20191029218691","name":"19-308","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Modernizing Unbundling and Resale Requirements in an Era of Next-Generation Networks and Services","description_display":"Modernizing Unbundling and Resale Requirements in an Era of Next-Generation Networks and Services","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"301945","name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2020-10-21T01:00:52.450Z","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":0,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:15.740Z","filers":[{"name":"USTelecom - The Broadband Association"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-21T01:00:52.450Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"AP","name":"Office of Chairman Ajit Pai","edocs_bureau_code":"OCHAP","id":185},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"BC","name":"Office of Commissioner Brendan Carr","edocs_bureau_code":"OCBC","id":200},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"JR","name":"Office of Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel","edocs_bureau_code":"OCJR","id":190},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"GS","name":"Office of Commissioner Geoffrey Starks","edocs_bureau_code":"OCGS","id":220},{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"MOR","name":"Office of Commissioner Michael O'Rielly","edocs_bureau_code":"OCMO","id":180}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Patrick Halley"}],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"20 1020 NARUC ex parte with Rosenworcel's office on Lifeline - Internet Freedom - Detariffing NPRM.fin.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10202650624742/1","description":""}],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10202650624742","total_page_count":5,"lawfirms":[],"date_disseminated":"2020-10-21T15:00:03.000Z","@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012001551,"name":"09-197","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Telecommunications Carriers Eligible to Receive Universal Service Support","description_display":"Telecommunications Carriers Eligible to Receive Universal Service Support","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012001693,"name":"10-90","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Connect America Fund A National Broadband Plan for Our Future High-Cost  Universal Service Support. .","description_display":"In the Matter of Connect America Fund A National Broadband Plan for Our Future High-Cost  Universal Service Support. .","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"20200319119941","name":"20-71","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Deregulation and Detariffing of Telephone Access Charges","description_display":"Deregulation and Detariffing of Telephone Access Charges","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"301676","name":"17-28","bureau_code":"WC","description":"WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU COPPER RETIREMENT NETWORK CHANGE NOTIFICATION FILED BY PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY D/B/A AT&T CALIFORNIA","description_display":"WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU COPPER RETIREMENT NETWORK CHANGE NOTIFICATION FILED BY PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY D/B/A AT&T CALIFORNIA","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2020-10-20T21:28:53.016Z","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":0,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:04.130Z","filers":[{"name":"National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-20T21:28:53.016Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"JR","name":"Office of Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel","edocs_bureau_code":"OCJR","id":190}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"James Bradford Ramsay"}],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"RIF Draft Order ex parte submission_(21759848_2).pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1020040330292/1","description":""}],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1020040330292","total_page_count":3,"lawfirms":[],"date_disseminated":"2020-10-21T15:00:03.000Z","@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"301945","name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2020-10-20T19:14:18.817Z","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":0,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:15.740Z","filers":[{"name":"ADT LLC d/b/a ADT Security Services"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-20T19:14:18.818Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"OSEC","name":"Office of the Secretary","edocs_bureau_code":"","id":103}],"entity":"Author","authors":[{"name":"Holly Borgmann"}],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"LETTER","short":"LETTER","id":29,"abbreviation":"LT"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"Free Press Title II Remand Ex Parte Letter.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10210426129857/1","description":"Free Press Remand Ex Parte Letter"}],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10210426129857","total_page_count":9,"lawfirms":[],"report_number":"2022467633","date_disseminated":"2020-10-21T15:00:03.000Z","@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"301945","name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2020-10-21T03:51:01.536Z","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":0,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:10.932Z","filers":[{"name":"Free Press"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-21T03:51:01.536Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Matthew F. Wood"}],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"2020-10-22 - ATT Ex Parte -WC 17-108, 17-287, 11-42.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1020128489269/1","description":""}],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1020128489269","total_page_count":5,"lawfirms":[],"date_disseminated":"2020-10-20T19:00:02.000Z","@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"301945","name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2020-10-20T16:04:02.129Z","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":0,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:04.129Z","filers":[{"name":"AT&T Services, Inc."}],"date_submission":"2020-10-20T16:04:02.129Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"OSEC","name":"Office of the Secretary","edocs_bureau_code":"","id":103}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Henry Hultquist"}],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"DCSL Ex Parte 101920.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10200620000705/1","description":""}],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10200620000705","total_page_count":7,"lawfirms":[],"date_disseminated":"2020-10-20T15:00:03.000Z","@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"301945","name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2020-10-20T02:46:40.943Z","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":0,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:19.709Z","filers":[{"name":"Digital Civil Society Lab"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-20T02:46:40.943Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Filer","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"FCC filing re New America study.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/101950498331/1","description":"Rebuttal of the New Americas OTI analysis"}],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101950498331","total_page_count":2,"lawfirms":[],"date_disseminated":"2020-10-20T15:00:03.000Z","@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":null,"comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301945","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","file_number":"","total":17355,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-10-25T15:13:55.730Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":null,"filed_by":"Latoya.Toles","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301945","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-287","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":17,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":17351,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null},{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2020-10-19T20:59:16.941Z","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":0,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:19.709Z","filers":[{"name":"Innovation Economy Institute"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-19T20:59:16.941Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Author","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"LETTER","short":"LETTER","id":29,"abbreviation":"LT"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"Amicus Brief Administrative, Communications, Energy, Antitrust, and Contract Law Professors Aug 27 2018.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1016284841804/1","description":"Amicus Brief filed in Mozilla v. FCC"},{"filename":"Cybersecurity Paradigm Shift published August 2019.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1016284841804/2","description":"Law Review Article"},{"filename":"Net Neutrality Powers Energy and Forestalls Climate Change by Professor Catherine J.K. Sandoval.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1016284841804/3","description":"Law Review Article"},{"filename":"Net Neutrality Repeal Rips Holes in the Public Safety Net.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1016284841804/4","description":"Law Review Article"},{"filename":"Letter BBIC Attachments October 16 2020.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1016284841804/5","description":"Letter"}],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1016284841804","total_page_count":318,"lawfirms":[],"date_disseminated":"2020-10-19T15:00:03.000Z","@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"301945","name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2020-10-16T20:49:47.864Z","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":0,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:22.571Z","filers":[{"name":"Broadband Institute of California @ Santa Clara University School of Law"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-16T20:49:47.864Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Filer","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"101686269271","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:15.733Z","filers":[{"name":"Isabelle Pisini"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-16T16:42:40.844Z","date_disseminated":"2020-10-16T19:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-10-16T16:42:40.844Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101579866980","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:51.809Z","filers":[{"name":"Brandon Vecchio"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-15T04:10:49.495Z","date_disseminated":"2020-10-15T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981521,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":39,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981491,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-10-15T13:00:03.000Z","text_data":"We need Net Neutrality. What have you gained without it, Ajit? Did you not already get your check? We are drowning, both in the Midwest & South quite literally, in countless departments, like yours, being overtaken by incompetent administrations. Again, like yours. Before you start the justification in your head about how \"that's not how you get something you want\", imagine what your legacy is going to be, and given the current political climate how difficult it will be, and likely has been, for you to feel safe in your own home, as so many Americans cannot without the security and disillusion that comes from having the protections of Net Neutrality. Both the distraction of our \"protected\", so to speak, streaming of Netflix and other capitalist monopolies and the literal security and/or financial compensation that comes from OUR data are essential elements to this experiment of a Democracy. You are beholden to US; not the other way around. Pass that shit. Period.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10151745810223","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:15.730Z","filers":[{"name":"Lindsey Woods"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-15T13:48:27.610Z","date_disseminated":"2020-10-15T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981522,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":39,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981491,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-10-15T13:48:27.610Z","text_data":"I support strong net neutrality rules backed by Title II and am ashamed of the constant attacks on it.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"Davenport NN Remand Ex Parte 10.14.20.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1014424021558/1","description":""}],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1014424021558","total_page_count":4,"lawfirms":[],"report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2020-10-15T15:00:03.000Z","@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"301945","name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2020-10-14T23:44:22.927Z","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":0,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:15.730Z","filers":[{"name":"Public Knowledge"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-14T23:44:22.927Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"GS","name":"Office of Commissioner Geoffrey Starks","edocs_bureau_code":"OCGS","id":220}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Harold Feld"}],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"LETTER","short":"LETTER","id":29,"abbreviation":"LT"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"Remand Order Ex Parte 10.14.20 FINAL.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1014219026000/1","description":""},{"filename":"AT&T_IPDSL_ADSL to Fiber Migration _redacted copy.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1014219026000/2","description":""},{"filename":"ATT Cover Ltr_Response to CPUC Legacy DSL Services Update(10-5-20).pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1014219026000/3","description":""},{"filename":"NDIA-CWA AT&T Redlining Report.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1014219026000/4","description":""}],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1014219026000","total_page_count":34,"lawfirms":[],"report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2020-10-14T21:00:03.000Z","@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"301945","name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2020-10-14T18:00:58.085Z","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":0,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:00.301Z","filers":[{"name":"Public Knowledge"},{"name":"Communications Workers of America"},{"name":"The Greenlining Institute"},{"name":"Common Cause"},{"name":"National Digital Inclusion Alliance"},{"name":"Next Century Cities"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-14T18:00:58.085Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Author","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101271613165","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:51.795Z","filers":[{"name":"Ajit Pai"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-12T20:11:29.026Z","date_disseminated":"2020-10-13T17:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981516,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":34,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981486,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-10-13T13:00:12.000Z","text_data":"I strongly support strong net neutrality backed by title 2 oversight of ISPs. The arguments set forth by Ajit Pai are ridiculous and transparent.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10102389922028","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:19.706Z","filers":[{"name":"Gabrielle Bakker"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-10T05:10:47.725Z","date_disseminated":"2020-10-13T17:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981515,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":39,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981486,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-10-13T13:00:12.000Z","text_data":"I strongly support net Neutrality and Title II oversight","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"101395061219","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:05.020Z","filers":[{"name":"Lynn Snow"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-13T01:01:08.108Z","date_disseminated":"2020-10-13T15:00:11.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981518,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":34,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981486,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-10-13T01:01:08.108Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger. During this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills. This isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety. The only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10130879721738","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:15.727Z","filers":[{"name":"Jonathan Kerns"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-13T00:28:14.101Z","date_disseminated":"2020-10-13T15:00:11.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981517,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":34,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981486,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-10-13T00:28:14.101Z","text_data":"I strongly support net neutrality backed by Title II oversight of Internet Service Providers.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1008271293271","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:05.017Z","filers":[{"name":"Paolo Sala"},{"name":"Hnin Thet Swe"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-08T13:20:13.581Z","date_disseminated":"2020-10-08T17:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981514,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":43,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981485,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-10-08T13:20:13.581Z","text_data":"To whom may concern, please preserve net neutrality and Title 2.\nCompanies, governments and anyone else has no right to bias how and what information reach end users, aka the people.\nYours faithfully,\nPaolo & Hnin","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1005952219164","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:51.754Z","filers":[{"name":"Claire Laborde"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-05T20:09:29.462Z","date_disseminated":"2020-10-06T15:00:09.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-10-05T20:09:29.462Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1005190841596","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:51.760Z","filers":[{"name":"Joel"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-05T21:18:07.534Z","date_disseminated":"2020-10-06T15:00:09.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981512,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":39,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981481,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-10-05T21:18:07.534Z","text_data":"Abolish Net Neutrality","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10052977024068","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:05.015Z","filers":[{"name":"Claire Laborde"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-05T20:10:03.932Z","date_disseminated":"2020-10-06T15:00:09.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-10-05T20:10:03.932Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1005249372973","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:05.016Z","filers":[{"name":"Randy Sena"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-05T23:27:01.888Z","date_disseminated":"2020-10-06T15:00:09.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981513,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":39,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981481,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-10-05T23:27:01.888Z","text_data":"Please preserve net neutrality and include it within Title II. The American people are united on this front. Any legislation otherwise is anti-American.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1002530005157","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:05.014Z","filers":[{"name":"Alexa Schummer"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-02T19:39:01.102Z","date_disseminated":"2020-10-05T15:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981508,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":37,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981479,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-10-02T19:39:01.102Z","text_data":"Please preserve net neutrality and include it within Title II. The American people are united on this front. Any legislation otherwise is anti-American.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1002838730701","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:56.421Z","filers":[{"name":"briab"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-02T21:11:56.043Z","date_disseminated":"2020-10-05T15:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981509,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":37,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981479,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-10-02T21:11:56.043Z","text_data":"Chairman Ajit Pai, I specifically support strong net neutrality, backed by title II oversight of ISP’s.\n\nPRESERVE NET NEUTRALITY & TITLE II","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1002084410229","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:56.420Z","filers":[{"name":"John Keaveney"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-02T16:53:23.633Z","date_disseminated":"2020-10-02T19:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-10-02T16:53:23.633Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"100108946739","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:12.430Z","filers":[{"name":"your mom"}],"date_submission":"2020-10-01T18:07:18.161Z","date_disseminated":"2020-10-01T21:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981506,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":35,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981477,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-10-01T18:07:18.161Z","text_data":"go fuck yourselves","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.10","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"LETTER","short":"LETTER","id":29,"abbreviation":"LT"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"OTI_Mozilla_CoC_9.30.2020Filing.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10930085585601/1","description":""},{"filename":"OTI_Cost_of_Connectivity_2020.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10930085585601/2","description":""}],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10930085585601","total_page_count":88,"lawfirms":[],"date_disseminated":"2020-10-01T15:00:03.000Z","@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"301945","name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2020-09-30T19:27:06.967Z","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":0,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:33:27.047Z","filers":[{"name":"New America's Open Technology Institute"}],"date_submission":"2020-09-30T19:27:06.967Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Author","authors":[{"name":"Joshua Stager"},{"name":"Claire Park"}],"_index":"filings.2020.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10930205616624","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:33:31.769Z","filers":[{"name":"Gregory Fleming"}],"date_submission":"2020-09-30T01:15:56.164Z","date_disseminated":"2020-09-30T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"","name":"17-108"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-09-30T01:15:56.164Z","text_data":"There is broad agreement that our nation and our economy needs an open and robust Internet. But, there is a right way and a wrong way to preserve the concept of an open internet. I am in favor of protecting the open internet with legislation that will codify the principles of transparency and no blocking, no censorship and no discriminatory throttling, and apply equally to everyone. Legislation approved by Congress would improve on the heavy-handed regulations the current FCC is looking to overturn that might deny consumers the services they want.  So, let’s do an open internet the right way, not the wrong way.","_index":"filings.2020.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1092886225128","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:33:27.047Z","filers":[{"name":"Lucas Johnson"}],"date_submission":"2020-09-28T17:39:46.804Z","date_disseminated":"2020-09-28T21:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981502,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":33,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981472,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-09-28T17:39:46.804Z","text_data":"Keep Net Neutrality as it is. I don't want ISP's / corporations dictating the speed of my internet for different services.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"USTelecom Broadband Pricing Index Report Ex Parte 9.28.20.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10928235054973/1","description":""}],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10928235054973","total_page_count":13,"lawfirms":[],"report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2020-09-28T21:00:03.000Z","@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"301945","name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2020-09-28T18:09:07.637Z","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":0,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:33:31.771Z","filers":[{"name":"USTelecom - The Broadband Association"}],"date_submission":"2020-09-28T18:09:07.637Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"OSEC","name":"Office of the Secretary","edocs_bureau_code":"","id":103}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Kristine Hackman"}],"_index":"filings.2020.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1092758950280","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:33:39.614Z","filers":[{"name":"Jeremy Adsitt"}],"date_submission":"2020-09-27T14:48:17.880Z","date_disseminated":"2020-09-28T17:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981501,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":36,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981472,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-09-28T13:00:05.000Z","text_data":"Net neutrality is vitally important to protect our freedom. In the information age we need to be ensured that our communication stream is reliable and efficient.  Additionally; the monies that would be spent on this should instead be encouraged to be focused on rural america who has sub standard access.  Serving our communities should be top of mind first and foremost over corporate profits.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10924334515777","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:33:22.279Z","filers":[{"name":"Samuel Lindsey"}],"date_submission":"2020-09-24T19:33:44.616Z","date_disseminated":"2020-09-25T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981499,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":36,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981469,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-09-24T19:33:44.616Z","text_data":"I want strong net neutrality laws backed by Title II oversight of ISPs. I can't believe it's in question.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1092516138097","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:33:27.046Z","filers":[{"name":"Richard William Blain"}],"date_submission":"2020-09-25T03:21:19.487Z","date_disseminated":"2020-09-25T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981500,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":37,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981470,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-09-25T03:21:19.487Z","text_data":"I support strong Internet neutrality with Title II oversight of Internet service providers. Net neutrality is necessary to prevent the Internet from becoming dominated by a few, extremely large organizations to the exclusion of small content providers.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1092416824689","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:33:12.553Z","filers":[{"name":"Brad Cornman"}],"date_submission":"2020-09-24T15:48:36.767Z","date_disseminated":"2020-09-24T19:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981498,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":35,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981467,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-09-24T15:48:36.767Z","text_data":"Chairman Pai\n\nI support strong net neutrality backed by title II oversight of ISPs","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10924526818221","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:33:24.674Z","filers":[{"name":"Eric Zollman"}],"date_submission":"2020-09-24T10:50:22.876Z","date_disseminated":"2020-09-24T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981497,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":35,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981467,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-09-24T13:00:04.000Z","text_data":"I strongly support Net Neutrality!!!., Please help to maintain the Internet's role as a powerful tool for freedom and equality ., I am begging you.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1092416171440","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:33:21.746Z","filers":[{"name":"Matt Cox"}],"date_submission":"2020-09-24T03:42:34.496Z","date_disseminated":"2020-09-24T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981496,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":35,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981467,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-09-24T03:42:34.496Z","text_data":"Support net neutrality","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1092270019386","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:33:17.672Z","filers":[{"name":"Ashley Chase"}],"date_submission":"2020-09-22T22:03:04.526Z","date_disseminated":"2020-09-23T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981495,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":40,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981466,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-09-22T22:03:04.526Z","text_data":"We should preserve net neutrality and Title 2.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10922106529767","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:33:17.672Z","filers":[{"name":"William McKinney"}],"date_submission":"2020-09-22T15:57:45.852Z","date_disseminated":"2020-09-22T19:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981494,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":39,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981465,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-09-22T15:57:45.852Z","text_data":"I support strong Net Neutrality backed by Title II oversight of ISP's. I believe this to be one of the most important and pressing issues for me personally.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMPLAINT","short":"COMPLAINT","id":124,"abbreviation":"CL"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"netNeutral.txt","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10921088009259/1","description":"I support net neutrality and Title II.  Please do not pander to the Internet service provider corporations and make the internet more expensive.  The Internet should be free for all, or at least not a special privilege."}],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10921088009259","total_page_count":1,"lawfirms":[],"file_number":"2","report_number":"8474919129","date_disseminated":"2020-09-21T21:00:02.000Z","@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2020-09-21T17:28:58.450Z","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":0,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:33:17.671Z","filers":[{"name":"ME"}],"date_submission":"2020-09-21T17:28:58.450Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Author","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1091933546260","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:33:19.195Z","filers":[{"name":"Darin G. Oar"}],"date_submission":"2020-09-19T18:59:15.910Z","date_disseminated":"2020-09-21T17:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981491,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":35,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981459,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-09-21T13:00:04.000Z","text_data":"I support net neutrality and encourage strong regulation and oversight on ISP's","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1091957940469","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:33:12.320Z","filers":[{"name":"Friedman"}],"date_submission":"2020-09-19T16:16:45.725Z","date_disseminated":"2020-09-21T17:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-09-21T13:00:04.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10921812817526","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:33:12.321Z","filers":[{"name":"Corey Dahlberg"}],"date_submission":"2020-09-21T12:13:50.857Z","date_disseminated":"2020-09-21T17:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981492,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":33,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981459,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-09-21T13:00:04.000Z","text_data":"I strongly support net neutrality laws.  The net neutrality laws were repealed a few years ago and the industry hasn't noticeably improved as you promised, Mr. Pai.  Instead, the ill effects of no net neutrality laws that you said wouldn't happen are happening.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10918324417232","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:33:12.319Z","filers":[{"name":"Marcia Nelson"}],"date_submission":"2020-09-18T19:53:46.402Z","date_disseminated":"2020-09-21T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-09-18T19:53:46.402Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10918073512717","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:33:10.672Z","filers":[{"name":"Philip Rood"}],"date_submission":"2020-09-18T23:00:53.876Z","date_disseminated":"2020-09-21T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981489,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":35,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981459,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-09-18T23:00:53.876Z","text_data":"Dear Ajit Pei, I strongly support net neutrality backed by Title II oversight of ISPs. Please follow the will of the people and not the corporations.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"109180025922760","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:33:20.541Z","filers":[{"name":"Devin Linehan"}],"date_submission":"2020-09-18T14:20:28.840Z","date_disseminated":"2020-09-18T17:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981487,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":33,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981457,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-09-18T14:20:28.840Z","text_data":"I support net neutrality and hope that the FCC will too.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10917242100826","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:33:17.324Z","filers":[{"name":"jose martinez"}],"date_submission":"2020-09-17T22:58:22.417Z","date_disseminated":"2020-09-18T15:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981486,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":33,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981457,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-09-17T22:58:22.417Z","text_data":"I support net neutrality!","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10917007031580","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:33:16.718Z","filers":[{"name":"david marlin"}],"date_submission":"2020-09-17T16:30:48.573Z","date_disseminated":"2020-09-17T19:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981485,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":32,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981456,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-09-17T16:30:48.573Z","text_data":"Save net neutrality","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1091616242494","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:33:19.918Z","filers":[{"name":"David Antonini"}],"date_submission":"2020-09-16T19:44:46.037Z","date_disseminated":"2020-09-17T15:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981484,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":30,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981454,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-09-16T19:44:46.037Z","text_data":"Please support strong net neutrality and strict monitoring of ISPs.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"109161195918132","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:33:19.575Z","filers":[{"name":"Bill Hung"}],"date_submission":"2020-09-16T18:58:24.864Z","date_disseminated":"2020-09-16T21:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981483,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":30,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981454,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-09-16T18:58:24.864Z","text_data":"I support restore Title ii and enforce strong net neutrality law for ISP. While you are reading, Ajit Pai, go fcc yourself, you are a shame and disgrace to the freedom of America.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10915539912262","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:33:07.326Z","filers":[{"name":"Mennel-Bell"}],"date_submission":"2020-09-15T18:39:15.791Z","date_disseminated":"2020-09-15T21:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-09-15T18:39:15.791Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10915095194204","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:53.115Z","filers":[{"name":"Kylie Tusing"}],"date_submission":"2020-09-15T02:29:25.541Z","date_disseminated":"2020-09-15T15:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981481,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":33,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981452,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-09-15T02:29:25.541Z","text_data":"I support strong Net Neutrality coming from Title II backed on ISPs.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1091161980077","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:14.664Z","filers":[{"name":"Valerie Smith"}],"date_submission":"2020-09-11T12:39:57.357Z","date_disseminated":"2020-09-11T17:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981479,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":37,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981449,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-09-11T13:00:06.000Z","text_data":"I support Net Neutrality","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"109112659321643","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:00.757Z","filers":[{"name":"Ishaan Singh"}],"date_submission":"2020-09-11T14:44:05.989Z","date_disseminated":"2020-09-11T17:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-09-11T14:44:05.989Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10911097656589","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:28.361Z","filers":[{"name":"John Schweitzerd"}],"date_submission":"2020-09-11T06:13:14.908Z","date_disseminated":"2020-09-11T17:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981478,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":37,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981449,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-09-11T13:00:06.000Z","text_data":"Dear Ajit Pei, I strongly support net neutrality backed by Title II oversight of ISPs","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1091043956288","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:05.227Z","filers":[{"name":"Linda Blodgett"}],"date_submission":"2020-09-10T06:22:57.084Z","date_disseminated":"2020-09-10T17:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-09-10T13:00:10.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10909145696194","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:10.901Z","filers":[{"name":"Jeff Luyet"}],"date_submission":"2020-09-09T22:53:46.869Z","date_disseminated":"2020-09-10T15:00:11.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-09-09T22:53:46.869Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10909011474360","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:10.900Z","filers":[{"name":"Ethan"}],"date_submission":"2020-09-09T04:54:37.384Z","date_disseminated":"2020-09-09T17:00:07.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981474,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":35,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981444,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-09-09T13:00:12.000Z","text_data":"Keep the Title ll strong regulation!","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1090823305465","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:53.048Z","filers":[{"name":"Brian Jay"}],"date_submission":"2020-09-08T21:51:10.355Z","date_disseminated":"2020-09-09T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-09-08T21:51:10.355Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10909574113220","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:55.801Z","filers":[{"name":"Evelyn MacMahon"}],"date_submission":"2020-09-09T03:02:15.901Z","date_disseminated":"2020-09-09T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981474,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":35,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981444,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-09-09T03:02:15.901Z","text_data":"Dear Ajit Pei,\n\nI strongly support net neutrality backed by Title II oversight of ISPs.\n\nEvelyn MacMahon","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1090820589327","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:15.671Z","filers":[{"name":"jessica kess"}],"date_submission":"2020-09-08T13:54:57.666Z","date_disseminated":"2020-09-08T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981472,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":33,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981442,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-09-08T13:54:57.666Z","text_data":"I support net nutrality backed by title II oversight of ISPs.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10906341009289","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:31:53.035Z","filers":[{"name":"Nick Mortis"}],"date_submission":"2020-09-06T18:20:03.113Z","date_disseminated":"2020-09-08T15:00:40.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981471,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":33,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981442,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-09-08T13:00:10.000Z","text_data":"I strongly support net neutrality backed by title II oversight of strong ISPs","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"109011305614746","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:32:08.213Z","filers":[{"name":"Orion Hunter"}],"date_submission":"2020-09-01T05:17:37.731Z","date_disseminated":"2020-09-01T15:00:19.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981470,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":41,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981440,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-09-01T13:00:14.000Z","text_data":"It is imperative that Net Neutrality and title II remain intact as is, permanently.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.9","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10901355208346","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:18.280Z","filers":[{"name":"Ajit Pai"}],"date_submission":"2020-09-01T02:56:26.239Z","date_disseminated":"2020-09-01T15:00:19.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981469,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":41,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981440,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-09-01T02:56:26.239Z","text_data":"I support strong Net Neutrality\nJohn Oliver sent me here","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1083027585234","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:14.291Z","filers":[{"name":"Wyatt Pearson"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-30T17:34:37.575Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-31T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981468,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":40,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981439,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-31T13:00:07.000Z","text_data":"Please preserve net neutrality and Title II ISP classification.  This isn't a joke. I like the internet very much and private companies shouldn't be allowed to make it more difficult for me to stream Avatar on Netflix with my friends until 4 AM.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1082856094743","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:14.267Z","filers":[{"name":"KE"},{"name":"EP"},{"name":"NET"},{"name":"NEUTRALITY"},{"name":"UNDER"},{"name":"TITLE II"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-28T15:07:15.449Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-28T19:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981466,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":44,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981436,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-28T15:07:15.449Z","text_data":"Net neutrality needs to continue and does not need to get privatized!!!\nI support strong net neutrality backed by Title II oversight of ISPs.\nAll online users need to come together as one and support and encourage net neutrality backed by Title II oversight of ISPs!","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1082892172578","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:08.589Z","filers":[{"name":"Tony"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-28T15:58:04.647Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-28T19:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-28T15:58:04.647Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10828590305798","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:08.580Z","filers":[{"name":"Valerie Gibbins"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-28T05:25:33.526Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-28T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-28T13:00:17.000Z","text_data":"I believe that we need a return to the 2015 Open Internet Rule. Net neutrality is critical to closing the digital divide and bringing internet access for all.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"108272790004485","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:17.545Z","filers":[{"name":"Jonathon Jehle"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-27T17:38:40.045Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-27T21:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981464,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":42,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981434,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-27T17:38:40.045Z","text_data":"Please keep Internet Service Providers as Title 2","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10827978211764","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:08.335Z","filers":[{"name":"Margaret Dukes"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-27T16:21:49.350Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-27T19:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-27T16:21:49.350Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10826353918012","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:10.489Z","filers":[{"name":"Tammy Martinez"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-26T13:07:03.323Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-26T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981462,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":43,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981433,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-26T13:07:03.323Z","text_data":"I demand net neutrality! I am a taxpayer!","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10824063698567","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:10.487Z","filers":[{"name":"Margaret Dukes"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-24T19:38:17.163Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-25T15:00:08.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-24T19:38:17.163Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1082409913727","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:07.540Z","filers":[{"name":"Jorge Espinoza"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-24T16:30:13.781Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-24T19:00:09.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981460,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":37,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981427,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-24T16:30:13.781Z","text_data":"I support and want the FCC to return to a strong net neutrality which recognizes ISP's under Title 2, especially as COVID-19 forces many to work/ remain at home.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10822208031837","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:07.538Z","filers":[{"name":"Scott Siegwald"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-22T20:46:24.591Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-24T17:00:24.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981456,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":37,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981426,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-24T13:00:18.000Z","text_data":"preserve net neutrality and title 2","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"108232974010633","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:10.487Z","filers":[{"name":"Scott Shields"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-23T11:59:37.275Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-24T17:00:24.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981459,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":37,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981426,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-24T13:00:18.000Z","text_data":"I support strong Net Neutrality backed by Title II oversight of ISPs. Thanks, Pai!","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"108221249608789","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:17.007Z","filers":[{"name":"Scott Siegwald"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-22T20:46:24.529Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-24T17:00:24.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981456,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":37,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981426,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-24T13:00:18.000Z","text_data":"preserve net neutrality and title 2","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1082262512395","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:12.872Z","filers":[{"name":"Scott Siegwald"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-22T20:46:24.570Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-24T17:00:24.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981456,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":37,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981426,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-24T13:00:18.000Z","text_data":"preserve net neutrality and title 2","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1082188261303","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:09.381Z","filers":[{"name":"Tory Gaurnier"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-21T22:03:44.117Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-24T15:00:08.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981455,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":37,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981426,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-21T22:03:44.117Z","text_data":"Net Neutrality was an important regulation to protect free market. The market is not free when a handful of corporations can control what content we can get online. Without Net Neutrality companies can pay internet providers to slow down their competitors services. Just because we haven't seen a lot of examples of this isn't reason to not have the protections in place. As an example, just because most people aren't going get drunk and drive a car doesn't mean it should be legal. The only reason to repeal this is to give companies the power to abuse their service, reinstate Net Neutrality!","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1082061416631","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:15.258Z","filers":[{"name":"David Falwell"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-20T19:09:34.085Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-21T15:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981454,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":36,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981424,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-20T19:09:34.084Z","text_data":"I strongly support Net Neutrality backed by Title II oversight of ISP's!","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"108201467827924","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:15.258Z","filers":[{"name":"Melvin Elliott"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-20T16:54:29.398Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-20T19:00:14.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"","name":"17-108"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-20T16:54:29.398Z","text_data":"Our country has benefitted from the internet in many ways, and Americans have come to depend on an open internet and the crucial open internet principles of transparency, no blocking, no censorship and no discriminatory throttling. But, internet rules should not change each time a new political party takes office or a new person is appointed to lead the Federal Communications Commission.\n\nThat’s why I am writing to ask that you work together to preserve these crucial internet principles by creating legislation that codifies them into law. The FCC’s action to overturn the current law designed 80 years ago, before the Internet was created, is a great first step. However, legislation is the only way to permanently preserve the open internet principles that we rely on. \n\nThank you for working to keep the internet a place where all citizens can find new opportunities and communicate freely.","_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1081604037922","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:14.644Z","filers":[{"name":"Aaron Donnelly"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-16T19:46:10.846Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-17T15:00:14.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981450,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":32,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981419,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-17T13:00:10.000Z","text_data":"I support Strong Net Neutrality backed up Title II oversight of ISP's","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"108170421728076","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:14.644Z","filers":[{"name":"utich"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-17T03:17:02.954Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-17T15:00:14.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012503091,"name":"14-28","bureau_code":"GN","description":"Protecting and Promoting the Open Internet","description_display":"Protecting and Promoting the Open Internet","bureau_name":"General (Multiple Bureaus)"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-17T13:00:10.000Z","text_data":"To Whom It May Concern.\nI am writing to express my opinion that Social Media Platform Providers (Twitter, Facebook, etc.) should be made to allow for Free Speech on their platforms. More to the point, that censorship based on political point of view should not be permitted.\nThank you for your time and attention.\nJohn Utich","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"108170047026770","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:14.644Z","filers":[{"name":"ROBERT MARCH"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-17T05:25:19.169Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-17T15:00:14.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-17T13:00:10.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10815035461749","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:09.358Z","filers":[{"name":"Ethan Brenwen"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-15T01:38:42.131Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-17T15:00:14.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981449,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":33,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981419,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-15T01:38:42.131Z","text_data":"I support strong net neutrality backed by title 2 oversight isp","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"108142246028436","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:16.476Z","filers":[{"name":"Noe Ortiz"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-14T20:45:09.512Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-17T15:00:14.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981448,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":33,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981419,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-14T20:45:09.512Z","text_data":"I specifically support strong net neutrality backed by TITLE II oversight of ISP.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"108131801810957","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:04.158Z","filers":[{"name":"Adam Filinovich"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-13T21:06:40.048Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-14T15:00:24.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981447,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":31,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981417,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-13T21:06:40.048Z","text_data":"In support of Title II regulations.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1081304066415","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:14.604Z","filers":[{"name":"Ella Soso"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-13T17:44:51.119Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-13T21:00:11.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981446,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":31,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981417,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-13T17:44:51.119Z","text_data":"I SUPPORT STRONG NET NEUTRALITY.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10813086397186","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:16.471Z","filers":[{"name":"Jessica Oldenkamp"},{"name":"Daniel Oldenkamp"},{"name":"logan oldenkamp"},{"name":"elora oldenkamp"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-13T14:46:58.290Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-13T17:00:13.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981445,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":27,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981412,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-13T14:46:58.290Z","text_data":"We need net neutrality to help start up companies and keep America’s tech game cutting edge.\n\nISPs need title 2 classification.\n\nAll traffic should be equal.  Big players shouldn’t be able to do back room deals to traffic shape the internet landscape.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10813019220241","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:16.471Z","filers":[{"name":"Aaron Alicea"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-13T03:32:02.126Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-13T15:00:20.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981442,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":27,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981412,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-13T03:32:02.126Z","text_data":"I strongly support net neutrality.  The internet is a necessity for people across the globe and allowing for a handful of people  who stand to profit from control of access to the information and services provided through the internet is setting a dangerous precedent.  Doing away with net neutrality is either malicious or misguided, but, either way, is wrong.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1081284812889","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:14.599Z","filers":[{"name":"Sarah Fadness"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-12T20:17:00.080Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-13T15:00:20.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-12T20:17:00.080Z","text_data":"Maintaining net neutrality is a no brainer in the US. This simply should not be a question. No one should be putting out an executive order to impose any kind of censorship in America.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10813126108771","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:08.682Z","filers":[{"name":"Teri Masters"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-13T08:18:55.602Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-13T15:00:20.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981443,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":27,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981412,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-13T13:00:17.000Z","text_data":"I strongly support net neutrality backed by Title II oversight of Isp’s!!","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1081388995920","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:04.045Z","filers":[{"name":"Teri Masters"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-13T08:15:39.998Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-13T15:00:20.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981443,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":27,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981412,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-13T13:00:17.000Z","text_data":"I strongly support new neutrality back up by Title II oversighta of Isp’s!!","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10811202205543","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:11.776Z","filers":[{"name":"Mackenzie"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-11T14:27:08.036Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-11T17:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981440,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":30,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981411,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-11T14:27:08.036Z","text_data":"I support strong net neutrality Backed by Title II oversight of ISPs \nThis is ridiculous that we even have to ask \nYou should listen and respond to us because it is the right thing to do","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10810174568736","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:16.471Z","filers":[{"name":"Nathan Boggs"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-10T17:12:26.385Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-10T21:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981439,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":28,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981409,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-10T17:12:26.385Z","text_data":"I strongly support preserving net neutrality and Title-II.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1080833479035","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:03.950Z","filers":[{"name":"James"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-08T02:52:42.688Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-10T19:08:49.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-08T02:52:42.688Z","text_data":"The net was begun with equality in mind and it shall remain that way.  Like healthcare, it is not something to be capitalized on for unfair profit.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10806052617331","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:03.918Z","filers":[{"name":"Halorie Walker-Sloss"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-06T18:31:28.312Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-06T21:00:07.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-06T18:31:28.312Z","text_data":"It is imperative that we return to the 2015 Open Internet Rule. Net neutrality is critical to closing the digital divide and bringing internet access for all, something undeniably necessary in this increasingly technological world.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"108060294407484","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:08.678Z","filers":[{"name":"Spencer Koelle"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-06T05:57:05.424Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-06T17:00:07.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-06T13:00:06.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\nDefend first amendment rights. ","_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1080523324212","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:11.772Z","filers":[{"name":"Saran Taj Singh"},{"name":"Supendeep Singh Dosanjh"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-05T19:17:33.934Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-06T15:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981435,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":29,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981406,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-05T19:17:33.934Z","text_data":"I support strong net neutrality.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10805712925550","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:11.771Z","filers":[{"name":"David Perry"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-05T04:10:54.540Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-05T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981434,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":34,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981404,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-05T13:00:23.000Z","text_data":"We need to have ISP's under Title 2.  We need the regulations to guarantee that our Internet isn't messed with.  You can't trust companies to do the right thing.  Preserve Net Neutrality and Title 2.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1080466404761","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:08.677Z","filers":[{"name":"Michael Cortright"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-04T21:55:45.042Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-05T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981433,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":34,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981404,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-04T21:55:45.041Z","text_data":"Preserve net neutrality and title 2","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10804527203953","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:11.769Z","filers":[{"name":"Ini Gabriel Uko"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-04T15:08:19.894Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-04T19:00:19.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981432,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":33,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981403,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-04T15:08:19.894Z","text_data":"I support strong net neutrality backed by Title 2 oversight of ISPs.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10802989807141","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:08.675Z","filers":[{"name":"Victoria Dahlin"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-02T19:22:35.028Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-03T15:00:18.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-03T13:00:08.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"108012580130552","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:14.293Z","filers":[{"name":"Kristen Z"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-01T12:34:23.667Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-03T15:00:18.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-03T13:00:08.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10802126346902","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:16:14.293Z","filers":[{"name":"John Keaveney"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-02T19:47:27.884Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-03T15:00:18.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-03T13:00:08.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.8","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10801092776048","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:24.675Z","filers":[{"name":"George Varghese"}],"date_submission":"2020-08-01T03:55:06.985Z","date_disseminated":"2020-08-03T15:00:18.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981428,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":31,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981399,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-08-01T03:55:06.985Z","text_data":"I support strong net neutrality backed by Title 2 oversight of ISPs.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"107311688820490","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:06.688Z","filers":[{"name":"Brooke Chekofsky"}],"date_submission":"2020-07-31T06:11:26.934Z","date_disseminated":"2020-07-31T17:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-07-31T13:00:05.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10731638100352","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:24.673Z","filers":[{"name":"Joe G"}],"date_submission":"2020-07-31T07:53:52.406Z","date_disseminated":"2020-07-31T17:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981425,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":31,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981395,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-07-31T13:00:05.000Z","text_data":"Restore full Net Neutrality Protections from I.S.P.'s and make the internet a public utility please!","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1073113049639","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:13.348Z","filers":[{"name":"Nic Sevic"}],"date_submission":"2020-07-31T11:34:13.019Z","date_disseminated":"2020-07-31T17:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981426,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":31,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981395,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-07-31T13:00:05.000Z","text_data":"I support net neutrality backed by title 2 oversight. Please stop trying to screw over citizens to cater to businesses.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10731540014414","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:13.756Z","filers":[{"name":"nadia shebaro"}],"date_submission":"2020-07-31T14:28:33.465Z","date_disseminated":"2020-07-31T17:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-07-31T14:28:33.465Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","short":"NOTICE","id":45,"abbreviation":"NO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"USTelecom Ex Parte Docket No. 17-108 17-287 11-42 07.30.20.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1073022624393/1","description":""}],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1073022624393","total_page_count":3,"lawfirms":[],"report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2020-07-30T21:00:04.000Z","@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"301945","name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2020-07-30T18:49:17.753Z","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":0,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:06.687Z","filers":[{"name":"USTelecom"}],"date_submission":"2020-07-30T18:49:17.753Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[{"filingsCount":0,"bureau_code":"GC","name":"Office of General Counsel","edocs_bureau_code":"OGC","id":125}],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Kristine Hackman"}],"_index":"filings.2020.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1073096821415","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:22.323Z","filers":[{"name":"Kylie Gregory"}],"date_submission":"2020-07-30T06:58:26.570Z","date_disseminated":"2020-07-30T17:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981422,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":30,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981393,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-07-30T13:00:14.000Z","text_data":"I support strongly enforced net neutrality under Title II.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10728116268762","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:06.684Z","filers":[{"name":"Andrew Nilson"}],"date_submission":"2020-07-28T19:56:09.104Z","date_disseminated":"2020-07-29T15:00:10.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981421,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":34,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981392,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-07-28T19:56:09.104Z","text_data":"I specifically support strong net neutrality backed by title 2 oversight of ISPs \n\np.s. fuck comcast","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1072866633569","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:34.163Z","filers":[{"name":"Max Hamilton"}],"date_submission":"2020-07-28T14:54:47.807Z","date_disseminated":"2020-07-28T17:00:21.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981420,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":33,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981391,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-07-28T14:54:47.807Z","text_data":"Preserve Net Neutrality and Title II safe guards!","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10727307420876","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:34.162Z","filers":[{"name":"Wilfredo Santander"}],"date_submission":"2020-07-27T17:30:14.337Z","date_disseminated":"2020-07-27T21:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"","name":"17-108"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-07-27T17:30:14.337Z","text_data":"I am writing today to encourage you to work together and move quickly on a permanent legislative fix to preserve an open internet that is transparent and free from blocking, censorship and discriminatory throttling. I believe only legislation can ensure we have permanent, enforceable open internet rules that apply equally to everyone and won’t change depending on which party is in power or who is running the FCC. \n\nThe FCC’s move to make sure the internet isn’t subject to heavy-handed laws created for the rotary phone is the right first step, but only legislation can put this issue beyond politics and ensure that vital consumer protections are stable and secure. \n\nAfter almost two decades of the FCC and the courts arguing this issue—it’s time for Congress to provide permanent and strong open internet protections to consumers and the entire internet community.","_index":"filings.2020.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1072462238464","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:34.162Z","filers":[{"name":"zach"}],"date_submission":"2020-07-24T04:53:54.964Z","date_disseminated":"2020-07-24T17:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981418,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":43,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981389,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-07-24T13:00:08.000Z","text_data":"I specifically support strong net neutrality.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"107210355800161","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:25.887Z","filers":[{"name":"jules nshimiye"}],"date_submission":"2020-07-21T21:59:13.071Z","date_disseminated":"2020-07-22T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981417,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":51,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981388,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-07-21T21:59:13.071Z","text_data":"keep title 2 of the communication Act of 1934 for net neutrality","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10720412604300","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:18.697Z","filers":[{"name":"Barbara Blough"}],"date_submission":"2020-07-20T02:28:43.105Z","date_disseminated":"2020-07-20T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981416,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":50,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981387,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-07-20T13:00:03.000Z","text_data":"Dear FCC Chairman Ajit Pai,\nI support the existing Net Neutrality rules, which classify internet service providers under the Title II provision of the Telecommunications Act. It is VERY important to American citizens that this does not change. Please DO NOT roll back these appropriate regulations. Thank you.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10716744525932","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:33.500Z","filers":[{"name":"ryan england"}],"date_submission":"2020-07-16T03:12:53.205Z","date_disseminated":"2020-07-16T15:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981415,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":90,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981386,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-07-16T03:12:53.205Z","text_data":"Title 2 net. neutrality rules need to stay.  Companies are incapable of policing themselves.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1071402332441","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:32.514Z","filers":[{"name":"EVERYONE"}],"date_submission":"2020-07-14T07:30:03.399Z","date_disseminated":"2020-07-14T17:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981414,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":102,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981385,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-07-14T13:00:05.000Z","text_data":"hello I'm a billionaire and I don't support net neutrality. I already spy at everyone on the net and I want to shape the internet as i see fit","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1071314286553","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:32.513Z","filers":[{"name":"ME EVERYONE"}],"date_submission":"2020-07-13T02:32:07.678Z","date_disseminated":"2020-07-13T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981412,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":98,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981381,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-07-13T13:00:06.000Z","text_data":"i hate you dont mess with title 2 or net neutrality","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10713713305136","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:17.801Z","filers":[{"name":"Adam Lucero"}],"date_submission":"2020-07-13T04:13:19.450Z","date_disseminated":"2020-07-13T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981413,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":98,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981381,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-07-13T13:00:06.000Z","text_data":"Net neutrality needs to be a right.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"107122816611436","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:08.836Z","filers":[{"name":"David Moore"}],"date_submission":"2020-07-12T20:05:14.711Z","date_disseminated":"2020-07-13T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981411,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":99,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981381,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-07-13T13:00:06.000Z","text_data":"I support strong net neutrality and it should be title 2 and shit.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10711199063568","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:57.081Z","filers":[{"name":"Bryer Marnin"}],"date_submission":"2020-07-11T16:10:03.729Z","date_disseminated":"2020-07-13T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-07-13T13:00:06.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10709395516631","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:25.131Z","filers":[{"name":"Michael Pereira"}],"date_submission":"2020-07-09T16:27:53.092Z","date_disseminated":"2020-07-09T19:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-07-09T16:27:53.092Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10709698820688","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:32.512Z","filers":[{"name":"Jennifer Caraway"}],"date_submission":"2020-07-09T13:16:25.880Z","date_disseminated":"2020-07-09T17:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981408,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":114,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981378,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-07-09T13:16:25.880Z","text_data":"I support Net Neutrality backed by Title II oversight of ISPs.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10708942621272","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:08.834Z","filers":[{"name":"Mehmet Yilmaz"}],"date_submission":"2020-07-08T21:22:05.533Z","date_disseminated":"2020-07-09T15:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981407,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":114,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981378,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-07-08T21:22:05.533Z","text_data":"We need strong net neutrality back with Title 2 oversight of ISPs.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"107072752309207","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:08.833Z","filers":[{"name":"stephanie gianarelli"}],"date_submission":"2020-07-07T01:59:44.320Z","date_disseminated":"2020-07-07T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981406,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":120,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981377,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-07-07T01:59:44.320Z","text_data":"Keep isps under Title 2!","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10706710810450","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:08.832Z","filers":[{"name":"John"}],"date_submission":"2020-07-06T06:48:43.395Z","date_disseminated":"2020-07-06T17:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-07-06T13:00:05.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1070513986131","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:57.058Z","filers":[{"name":"Samantha Schachner"}],"date_submission":"2020-07-05T15:40:57.737Z","date_disseminated":"2020-07-06T17:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981402,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":114,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981370,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-07-06T13:00:05.000Z","text_data":"Please preserve net neutrality and Title II for ISPs.  While you're at it, could you also get rid of the cable company oligopoly and collusion that is currently resulting not only in high prices but also in terrible internet that is reportedly half the speed of Singapore's?  Thank you!","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10704279291279","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:24.679Z","filers":[{"name":"Elaine"}],"date_submission":"2020-07-04T14:36:02.610Z","date_disseminated":"2020-07-06T17:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-07-06T13:00:05.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1070469689772","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:24.679Z","filers":[{"name":"Felicia Ortez"}],"date_submission":"2020-07-04T06:49:05.806Z","date_disseminated":"2020-07-06T17:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-07-06T13:00:05.000Z","text_data":"I believe that we need a return to the 2015 Open Internet Rule. Net neutrality is critical to closing the digital divide and bringing internet access for all.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1070337972045","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:57.058Z","filers":[{"name":"jig p"}],"date_submission":"2020-07-03T06:53:18.288Z","date_disseminated":"2020-07-06T17:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981399,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":129,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981370,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-07-06T13:00:05.000Z","text_data":"Stronger net neutrality is necessary and a right to the public. Do not listen to that crazed man, fire Ajit Pai!","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"107061148030223","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:57.058Z","filers":[{"name":"jonathan smith"}],"date_submission":"2020-07-06T04:16:36.297Z","date_disseminated":"2020-07-06T17:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981404,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":113,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981370,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-07-06T13:00:05.000Z","text_data":"Leave isps in title2!\nBe less evil shitheads!","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10705149528924","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:17.799Z","filers":[{"name":"Chase Masten"}],"date_submission":"2020-07-05T18:59:06.992Z","date_disseminated":"2020-07-06T17:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981403,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":113,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981370,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-07-06T13:00:05.000Z","text_data":"REMOVE DATA CAPS NOW AND FOREVER","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"107021122530505","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:57.056Z","filers":[{"name":"Andrew Morilak"}],"date_submission":"2020-07-02T15:31:00.281Z","date_disseminated":"2020-07-02T19:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981398,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":131,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981368,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-07-02T15:31:00.281Z","text_data":"Net neutrality must be present in a nation where internet access and connection had become a basic necessity.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1070264077637","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:17.798Z","filers":[{"name":"Aaron"}],"date_submission":"2020-07-02T02:44:44.997Z","date_disseminated":"2020-07-02T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981397,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":131,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981368,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-07-02T02:44:44.997Z","text_data":"I support STRONG Net Neutrality and thats why title 2 needs to oversight ISP","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"DHS v Regents Ex Parte FINAL 7.1.20.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10701135710989/1","description":""}],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10701135710989","total_page_count":5,"lawfirms":[],"report_number":"","date_disseminated":"2020-07-01T21:00:04.000Z","@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"301945","name":"17-287","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","description_display":"Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":1012101944,"name":"11-42","bureau_code":"WC","description":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","description_display":"In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Lifelineand Link Up Llifeline and  Link Up Reform and Modernization.","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"date_received":"2020-07-01T17:57:56.838Z","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":0,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:07.868Z","filers":[{"name":"Public Knowledge"},{"name":"Access Now"},{"name":"Common Cause"},{"name":"New America's Open Technology Institute"}],"date_submission":"2020-07-01T17:57:56.838Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Harold Feld"}],"_index":"filings.2020.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"107011728423634","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:24.678Z","filers":[{"name":"Roger Weitzel"}],"date_submission":"2020-07-01T06:11:09.653Z","date_disseminated":"2020-07-01T15:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981394,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":142,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981365,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-07-01T13:00:05.000Z","text_data":"I support internet neutrality with Title II","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.7","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1063035009105","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:30.038Z","filers":[{"name":"Haniff Clarke"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-30T19:30:33.773Z","date_disseminated":"2020-07-01T15:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-30T19:30:33.773Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1063078482104","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:38.476Z","filers":[{"name":"Kenneth C Anderson"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-30T15:11:34.824Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-30T19:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-30T15:11:34.824Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10628346220221","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:28.869Z","filers":[{"name":"Grant Bagshaw"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-28T12:49:22.913Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-29T17:00:09.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981390,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":142,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981359,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-29T13:00:18.000Z","text_data":"I would like to affirm my support for Net  Neutrality remaining under Title 2 instead of Title 1 as a United States citizen. Ajit Pai is the human embodiment of the friend zone","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1062842776459","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:28.869Z","filers":[{"name":"Benjamin Bingaman"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-28T21:26:35.011Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-29T17:00:09.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-29T13:00:18.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1062821988925","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:28.869Z","filers":[{"name":"smileyman"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-28T03:43:19.220Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-29T17:00:09.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-29T13:00:18.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10628210476922","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:28.869Z","filers":[{"name":"Angie Pfeifer"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-28T01:10:06.131Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-29T17:00:09.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981388,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":142,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981359,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-29T13:00:18.000Z","text_data":"Aside from the fact that Pai's appointment -- as a former Verizon patsy whose FCC lawsuit directly informs his politics -- creates a blatant conflict of interest that renders his ability to protect consumers suspect, I want to weigh in to express my support for continued Title II classification and oversight of internet providers and for net neutrality. The fox is only good at looking like its keeping the hens safe long enough for the farmer to look away. To claim that weaker oversight protects consumers is as specious as it is self-serving. And to be clear, I mean self-serving for Pai and his corporate cronies. Protect net neutrality. Not everything should be for sale, and American citizens need equal and fair access to information that isn't predicated on who's charging us more.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1062629801809","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:46.424Z","filers":[{"name":"Lance Parrish"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-26T19:11:16.561Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-29T15:00:08.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981387,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":163,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981359,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-26T19:11:16.561Z","text_data":"I support net Neutrality backed by title 2. I also know this is too late, but I don't like you guys.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10625100014457","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:30.039Z","filers":[{"name":"Debra Cameron"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-25T23:50:39.782Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-26T15:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-25T23:50:39.782Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"106251944900064","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:47.991Z","filers":[{"name":"Richard Lalla"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-25T20:48:16.108Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-26T15:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-25T20:48:16.108Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10625051506502","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:47.991Z","filers":[{"name":"Debra Cameron"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-25T23:50:10.449Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-26T15:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-25T23:50:10.449Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10625292429776","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:30.039Z","filers":[{"name":"Debra Cameron"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-25T23:51:09.564Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-26T15:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-25T23:51:09.564Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10626183296460","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:56.062Z","filers":[{"name":"Brecht"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-26T02:01:45.604Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-26T15:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-26T02:01:45.604Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10625128817627","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:47.991Z","filers":[{"name":"Justin Boykin"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-25T20:43:35.282Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-26T15:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-25T20:43:35.282Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10625649021410","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:30.038Z","filers":[{"name":"David Kent"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-25T19:49:15.265Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-26T15:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-25T19:49:15.265Z","text_data":"I cannot believe that the repeal of net neutrality is up for discussion. The internet provides everyone who uses it vital information that I would consider as necessary as electricity and water. I would argue that internet should be considered a basic human right so that anyone can use it to better themselves and their position in life. KEEP NET NEUTRALITY","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"106251602607290","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:56.061Z","filers":[{"name":"Cheryl Leclerc"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-25T20:31:29.566Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-26T15:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-25T20:31:29.566Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"106253094722475","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:24.464Z","filers":[{"name":"oz guetta"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-25T13:24:04.200Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-25T17:00:15.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981378,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":293,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981349,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-25T13:24:04.200Z","text_data":"Preserve the neutrality","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1062479125542","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:49.991Z","filers":[{"name":"Nicole Willoughby"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-24T22:28:50.925Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-25T15:00:09.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981377,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":293,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981349,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-24T22:28:50.925Z","text_data":"YAAAASSSSS STRONG NET NEUTRALITY PLEASE! GIVE US TITLE II! Don't be dumb","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10624196518143","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:47.989Z","filers":[{"name":"Brecht"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-24T03:24:17.872Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-24T15:00:07.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-24T03:24:17.872Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10624256315472","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:54.976Z","filers":[{"name":"Christopher Mason"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-24T04:18:08.162Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-24T15:00:07.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981375,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":291,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981347,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-24T13:00:05.000Z","text_data":"The internet is a fundamental service in modern times and as such it should be classified as a public utility like phone (cellular) and electrical services.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10623092393749","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:47.478Z","filers":[{"name":"Margaret Koldinger"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-23T05:38:02.376Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-23T17:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981374,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":289,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981345,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-23T13:00:07.000Z","text_data":"Ajit Pai, you little sellout simp bitch, better fight for net neutrality.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10622622230787","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:31.348Z","filers":[{"name":"Nancy Root"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-22T22:38:02.222Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-23T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-22T22:38:02.222Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"106220016714791","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:47.477Z","filers":[{"name":"William Raymond"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-22T16:14:28.474Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-22T19:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-22T16:14:28.474Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10622227932319","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:53.316Z","filers":[{"name":"Caephren Elizabeth McKenna"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-22T04:30:29.392Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-22T17:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-22T13:00:07.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10621438225542","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:53.316Z","filers":[{"name":"asdsad eqweasd"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-21T00:08:17.749Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-22T17:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981369,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":395,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981338,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-22T13:00:07.000Z","text_data":"asdasdasd","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1062080884694","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:47.076Z","filers":[{"name":"Alexander Durnan"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-20T20:33:00.168Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-22T17:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-22T13:00:07.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10620502101258","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:31.347Z","filers":[{"name":"Sarah Reed"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-20T04:43:56.943Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-22T17:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-22T13:00:07.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10620931720953","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:38.477Z","filers":[{"name":"Janet Brooks"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-20T18:05:37.795Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-22T17:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981367,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":493,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981338,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-22T13:00:07.000Z","text_data":"Keep net neutrality and title II\nHands off","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10621222047063","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:31.347Z","filers":[{"name":"Jeff Roth"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-21T05:05:11.611Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-22T17:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-22T13:00:07.000Z","text_data":"Stop net neutrality. Really.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10619035574732","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:51.805Z","filers":[{"name":"R.M."}],"date_submission":"2020-06-19T08:06:17.369Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-19T17:00:07.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981363,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":7944,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981337,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-19T13:00:07.000Z","text_data":"I stand for net neutrality \nIf you don’t, go f*** yourself \nYou arseholes are small internet business killers","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10618056970830","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:09.859Z","filers":[{"name":"Kyli Michaels"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-18T01:03:42.631Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-18T15:00:09.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-18T01:03:42.631Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10617451924144","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:58.812Z","filers":[{"name":"Sam Robnett"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-17T21:48:56.666Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-18T15:00:09.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-17T21:48:56.666Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10618783219227","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:58.813Z","filers":[{"name":"Jacob Underwood"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-18T02:36:57.886Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-18T15:00:09.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981360,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":9455,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981334,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-18T02:36:57.886Z","text_data":"I strongly support Title-2 based Net Neutrality.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1061759075269","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:44.293Z","filers":[{"name":"Alyssa"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-17T17:39:45.844Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-17T21:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-17T17:39:45.844Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10617245349172","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:44.293Z","filers":[{"name":"net"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-17T08:02:15.710Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-17T15:00:07.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981355,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":9527,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981328,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-17T13:00:05.000Z","text_data":"Net Neutrality II: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver Net Neutrality II: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver Net Neutrality II: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1061622920834","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:19.001Z","filers":[{"name":"Jesus The Christ"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-16T20:21:22.391Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-17T15:00:07.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981352,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":9504,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981305,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-16T20:21:22.391Z","text_data":"broseph, honestly I want to watch netfliks and if u slo down my internet then i will be sad ;c plez dont kil my hapinis. also im not a robot but i think you know that im nod realie jesis becuz jesus doesnt need god wifi becuz he is rhe wifi you got what im sayin? also i want a new cah? okey thonks for the stonks :s that was is a jok.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10617078613908","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:19.002Z","filers":[{"name":"Emily Ren"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-17T00:26:51.777Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-17T15:00:07.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981354,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":9527,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981328,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-17T00:26:51.777Z","text_data":"I support strong net neutrality backed by title 2 oversight of ISPs.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"106172910415451","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:51.800Z","filers":[{"name":"net"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-17T08:02:15.655Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-17T15:00:07.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981355,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":9527,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981328,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-17T13:00:05.000Z","text_data":"Net Neutrality II: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver Net Neutrality II: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver Net Neutrality II: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1061619361934","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:56.668Z","filers":[{"name":"Karen Kujala"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-16T23:08:57.457Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-17T15:00:07.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-16T23:08:57.457Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10616250640242","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:06.707Z","filers":[{"name":"Gary Ostlund"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-16T16:36:02.461Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-16T19:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-16T16:36:02.461Z","text_data":"The rural people need the internet so please help them.\nThank you","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1061624758323","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:06.707Z","filers":[{"name":"Nicholas Kyriazi"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-16T16:41:02.355Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-16T19:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-16T16:41:02.355Z","text_data":"Regarding broadband internet access for rural America, there are trade-offs living far apart from each other.  I live in the inner city in Pittsburgh and I must deal with anti-social behavior every day as well as litter, graffiti, and the homeless.  But I can live without a car, and walk to all the amenities enabled by densely populated cities.  Internet providers can make money in densely populated areas.  They cannot make money having to provide service for sparsely populated areas.  The government should not subsidize sparsely populated by forcing me to pay for the costs for providing rural areas with broadband internet access, either from my tax dollars or from forcing private companies to subsidize rural customers by making those in densely populated areas pay for customers in sparsely populated areas.","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1061641012536","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:06.707Z","filers":[{"name":"Brenda Smith"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-16T16:53:03.397Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-16T19:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-16T16:53:03.397Z","text_data":"Give rural areas internet and at a price we can afford","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1061622055049","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:56.666Z","filers":[{"name":"Judith Brown"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-16T16:54:03.383Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-16T19:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-16T16:54:03.382Z","text_data":"The Covid 19 virus has shown us just how important the internet is. Therefore I would like to encourage you to make broadband internet available to the rural areas of our country.","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10616766518025","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:56.666Z","filers":[{"name":"Samuel Wilburn"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-16T16:35:03.417Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-16T19:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-16T16:35:03.417Z","text_data":"test test test test test test test test test test","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1061693346335","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:17.051Z","filers":[{"name":"Andrea Reeves"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-16T16:39:02.438Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-16T19:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-16T16:39:02.438Z","text_data":"It’s way past time to get internet service in rural areas! We have satellites, technology and people willing to work. Let’s do this instead of bicker in Washington about how bad Pelosi’s facelift went during Covid lockdown.","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10616075409951","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:17.051Z","filers":[{"name":"Jeff McReynolds"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-16T16:49:03.280Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-16T19:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-16T16:49:03.280Z","text_data":"I live on the NW point of the continent and by the time news gets to me it is old unless it’s on the computer not the “programmed tv”","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1061619458567","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:17.051Z","filers":[{"name":"Harris LaFleur"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-16T16:52:03.371Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-16T19:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-16T16:52:03.371Z","text_data":"Make broadband access available for all rural Americans.","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1061641118133","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:17.051Z","filers":[{"name":"Jet Taylor"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-16T16:43:02.305Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-16T19:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-16T16:43:02.305Z","text_data":"Help President Trump Increase Broadband Internet Access for Rural America","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10616223785709","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:48.989Z","filers":[{"name":"Thomas Burk"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-16T16:38:02.546Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-16T19:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-16T16:38:02.546Z","text_data":"One of the lessons we’ve learned from the Coronavirus lockdowns is just how important the Internet is for our day-to-day lives.  Whether it’s attending religious services, staying connected to family and friends, or for work, fast and reliable Internet is extremely important.\nThat’s why I am asking you to end an era of neglect to farmers and the rest of rural America and increase broad acess for rural America.","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10616198336438","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:41.764Z","filers":[{"name":"Linda Fogleman"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-16T16:57:03.487Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-16T19:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-16T16:57:03.487Z","text_data":"There have been children without broadband internet that couldn't do their school work while they were confined during the virus.  Please make it possible for rural areas to have this need met.","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10616103265045","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:41.764Z","filers":[{"name":"Lynn Oosterhuis"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-16T16:50:03.203Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-16T19:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-16T16:50:03.203Z","text_data":"Please help President Trump increase broadband internet access for rural America","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10616036475165","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:41.764Z","filers":[{"name":"Raymond Davis"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-16T16:55:03.547Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-16T19:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-16T16:55:03.547Z","text_data":"Please help President Trump to increase broad band to rule America, we need it.","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1061683479278","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:06.707Z","filers":[{"name":"Dorien deLusignan"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-16T16:37:02.385Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-16T19:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-16T16:37:02.385Z","text_data":"I moved here to semi-rural Suffolk, VA from the next county, Isle of Wight, VA. This was a distance of 10 miles. I now have lightning fast internet while the folks where I lived 10 miles away continue with Dial-Up or, at great price, slightly faster Cell Phone tower adapters. This is very sad for those people. Please put forth a greater effort to get faster speed Internet to more of the rural America regions. Sincerely and in Christ, R. Dorien and Cheryl deLusignan","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10616151718239","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:06.707Z","filers":[{"name":"Martha Johnson"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-16T16:45:02.369Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-16T19:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-16T16:45:02.369Z","text_data":"Internet access may not be a 'right' in the Constitution, but this epidemic has pretty much proved it's a 'need'.  Please make it easier and cheaper for everybody to have 5G access.  Thanks!","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1061674726025","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:48.989Z","filers":[{"name":"Sally Hancock"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-16T16:46:02.392Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-16T19:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-16T16:46:02.392Z","text_data":"There are only two options open where I live, the one I have cost  $100.00 a month just for wifi and a land line phone.  No cab;e.","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1061628887221","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:41.764Z","filers":[{"name":"Drew Keller"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-16T16:47:02.343Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-16T19:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-16T16:47:02.343Z","text_data":"Please make sure that everyone has access to broadband access, in this case Rural America.","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1061630793540","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:41.764Z","filers":[{"name":"Patsy Stringer"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-16T16:40:02.464Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-16T19:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-16T16:40:02.464Z","text_data":"Please increa","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10616054290898","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:56.666Z","filers":[{"name":"Lonnie Hawkins"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-16T16:42:02.646Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-16T19:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-16T16:42:02.646Z","text_data":"Please increase broadband internet access to rural America.","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1061662267272","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:06.707Z","filers":[{"name":"Connor Leech"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-16T16:48:02.283Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-16T19:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-16T16:48:02.283Z","text_data":"Please increase funding for internet access","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1061699301237","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:06.707Z","filers":[{"name":"Jo Powers"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-16T16:51:03.539Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-16T19:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-16T16:51:03.539Z","text_data":"We need broadband internet service in rural areas","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"106161687425005","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:48.989Z","filers":[{"name":"William Nichols"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-16T16:44:02.329Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-16T19:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-16T16:44:02.329Z","text_data":"Please increase Broadband Internet Access for Rural America.","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10616281461281","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:17.051Z","filers":[{"name":"Robert Larimer"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-16T16:56:03.265Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-16T19:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-16T16:56:03.265Z","text_data":"Get off your fat duffs and increase President Trump's broadband access to rural America now- -!","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10615291545036","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:06.706Z","filers":[{"name":"Donald Dumpf"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-15T22:01:39.954Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-16T15:00:07.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981326,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":9500,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981301,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-15T22:01:39.954Z","text_data":"Net neutrality under Title 2 regulation please.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10616227776020","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:48.989Z","filers":[{"name":"Bryer Marnin"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-16T00:54:07.777Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-16T15:00:07.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-16T00:54:07.777Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1061681012554","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:41.763Z","filers":[{"name":"Jeanne Schlatter"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-16T02:10:59.364Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-16T15:00:07.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-16T02:10:59.364Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"106152566916408","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:48.989Z","filers":[{"name":"Hazel Brown"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-15T20:04:55.927Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-16T15:00:07.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-15T20:04:55.927Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10613158791396","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:48.988Z","filers":[{"name":"Anne Wolka"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-13T11:26:33.494Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-15T17:00:07.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981315,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":9522,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981288,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-15T13:00:05.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger. During this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills. This isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety. The only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10614160810898","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:41.760Z","filers":[{"name":"Nancy Root"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-14T22:00:10.781Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-15T17:00:07.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-15T13:00:05.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1061424808992","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:06.706Z","filers":[{"name":"michael"},{"name":"richard"},{"name":"dye"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-14T20:32:50.086Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-15T17:00:07.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981320,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":9488,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981288,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-15T13:00:05.000Z","text_data":"i specifically support strong neutrality backed by title 2 oversight of isps.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"106141667423316","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:06.706Z","filers":[{"name":"Nancy"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-14T00:18:55.394Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-15T17:00:07.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-15T13:00:05.000Z","text_data":"This is another example of ordinary people, the core of America, being coopted by powerful people taking away what is now perhaps as important as voting","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1061402918677","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:58.809Z","filers":[{"name":"Demerise Cormier"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-14T01:51:06.238Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-15T17:00:07.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-15T13:00:05.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10615568614145","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:58.809Z","filers":[{"name":"Susan Osada"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-15T09:37:21.392Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-15T17:00:07.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-15T13:00:05.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"106141862507692","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:06.706Z","filers":[{"name":"michael"},{"name":"richard"},{"name":"dye"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-14T20:32:49.990Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-15T17:00:07.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981320,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":9488,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981288,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-15T13:00:05.000Z","text_data":"i specifically support strong neutrality backed by title 2 oversight of isps.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10613126855984","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:06.706Z","filers":[{"name":"Benjamin Bingaman"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-13T14:08:12.707Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-15T17:00:07.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-15T13:00:05.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1061371162731","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:48.988Z","filers":[{"name":"guy Jossrand"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-13T18:34:55.366Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-15T17:00:07.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-15T13:00:05.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10615010787799","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:58.809Z","filers":[{"name":"Susan Osada"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-15T09:37:32.318Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-15T17:00:07.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-15T13:00:05.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1061350606593","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:41.760Z","filers":[{"name":"Skye Morales"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-13T06:02:39.558Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-15T17:00:07.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981314,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":9522,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981288,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-15T13:00:05.000Z","text_data":"I support this","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1061234688907","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:06.706Z","filers":[{"name":"Jacob Painter"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-12T19:43:25.293Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-15T15:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-12T19:43:25.293Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"106131553914021","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:17.051Z","filers":[{"name":"Aurora Grabill"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-13T03:16:31.539Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-15T15:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-13T03:16:31.539Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"106122243704246","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:41.759Z","filers":[{"name":"Maryann Gianantoni"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-12T17:23:36.512Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-12T21:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-12T17:23:36.512Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10611693603197","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:48.986Z","filers":[{"name":"Mohsin"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-11T01:25:48.480Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-11T15:00:10.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981310,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":9564,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981286,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-11T01:25:48.480Z","text_data":"for net neutrality","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"106101740822623","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:17.049Z","filers":[{"name":"Justin Truong"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-10T17:12:00.039Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-10T21:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-10T17:12:00.039Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1061067643830","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:56.666Z","filers":[{"name":"Gary"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-10T14:18:20.418Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-10T17:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-10T14:18:20.418Z","text_data":"I am tired of corporate elite benefiting more than the public with how tax money is used. When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1061081892547","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:48.986Z","filers":[{"name":"William Wilson"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-10T14:54:59.852Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-10T17:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-10T14:54:59.852Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"106090024302188","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:41.752Z","filers":[{"name":"Robert Bard"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-09T22:07:18.568Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-10T15:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-09T22:07:18.568Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10609146074464","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:17.049Z","filers":[{"name":"Nina Yuchi"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-09T23:19:55.664Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-10T15:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-09T23:19:55.664Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10609202057121","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:48.986Z","filers":[{"name":"Ed Rich"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-09T21:14:08.575Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-10T15:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-09T21:14:08.575Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\nWhy would you want us to submit to corps foreign controls?   ","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10609090317857","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:56.666Z","filers":[{"name":"Krishna Murphy"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-09T19:39:01.485Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-10T15:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-09T19:39:01.485Z","text_data":"Privacy IS protected by the Constitution =Don't let anyone tell you otherwise= because ALL the rights belong to the PEOPLE!\n\nWhen the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"106091250701932","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:17.049Z","filers":[{"name":"Allan Albaitis"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-09T19:36:02.098Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-10T15:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-09T19:36:02.098Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10609616800613","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:48.986Z","filers":[{"name":"Norma Panko"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-09T22:01:45.910Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-10T15:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-09T22:01:45.910Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10609108059116","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:48.986Z","filers":[{"name":"Linda Lewis"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-09T21:59:20.192Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-10T15:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-09T21:59:20.192Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"106092838119820","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:41.752Z","filers":[{"name":"Robert Bard"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-09T22:06:54.605Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-10T15:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-09T22:06:54.605Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10609510224351","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:41.752Z","filers":[{"name":"Lisa"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-09T18:36:08.608Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-09T21:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-09T18:36:08.608Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1060955517359","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:48.986Z","filers":[{"name":"Kenneth Carmel"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-09T18:45:35.862Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-09T21:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-09T18:45:35.862Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1060987528354","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:48.986Z","filers":[{"name":"Eleanor Smithwick"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-09T17:41:09.205Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-09T21:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-09T17:41:09.205Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10609899817975","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:06.705Z","filers":[{"name":"Teniya"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-09T16:08:08.378Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-09T19:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-09T16:08:08.378Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"106090262927555","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:56.665Z","filers":[{"name":"Riane Hunt"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-09T16:23:47.021Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-09T19:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-09T16:23:47.021Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10608603100906","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:56.665Z","filers":[{"name":"Megan Molnar"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-08T21:58:32.289Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-09T15:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-08T21:58:32.289Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10607128776843","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:56.665Z","filers":[{"name":"ROBERT SOOS"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-07T09:57:49.666Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-08T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-08T13:00:03.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10608646923017","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:17.049Z","filers":[{"name":"Dean Smith"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-08T14:59:23.138Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-08T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-08T14:59:23.138Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"106060292722038","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:06.705Z","filers":[{"name":"Christopher Clark"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-06T18:14:08.978Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-08T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-08T13:00:03.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"106080723312510","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:56.665Z","filers":[{"name":"Sam You"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-08T02:33:22.016Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-08T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-08T13:00:03.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1060766679108","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:56.665Z","filers":[{"name":"Maxine Masajo"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-07T08:19:29.065Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-08T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"","name":"17-108"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-08T13:00:03.000Z","text_data":"I am writing today to encourage you to work together and move quickly on a permanent legislative fix to preserve an open internet that is transparent and free from blocking, censorship and discriminatory throttling. I believe only legislation can ensure we have permanent, enforceable open internet rules that apply equally to everyone and won’t change depending on which party is in power or who is running the FCC. \r\n\r\nThe FCC’s move to make sure the internet isn’t subject to heavy-handed laws created for the rotary phone is the right first step, but only legislation can put this issue beyond politics and ensure that vital consumer protections are stable and secure. \r\n\r\nAfter almost two decades of the FCC and the courts arguing this issue—it’s time for Congress to provide permanent and strong open internet protections to consumers and the entire internet community. \r\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10606306407813","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:06.705Z","filers":[{"name":"Allison"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-06T20:25:03.941Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-08T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-08T13:00:03.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10606461926166","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:41.746Z","filers":[{"name":"Edelstein"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-06T01:03:01.805Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-08T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-06T01:03:01.805Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10604947117405","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:56.665Z","filers":[{"name":"Adam Cuttler"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-04T22:03:56.020Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-05T15:00:11.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981285,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":10135,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981261,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-04T22:03:56.020Z","text_data":"I strongly support met neutrality backed by Title 2 oversight of ISPs.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1060496210428","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:48.985Z","filers":[{"name":"Joyce Perreira"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-04T06:29:26.534Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-04T17:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-04T13:00:18.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1060474267385","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:06.705Z","filers":[{"name":"Jose Dante Chan"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-04T08:01:49.049Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-04T17:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981284,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":10271,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981254,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-04T13:00:18.000Z","text_data":"I'm supporting John Oliver's call for keeping the net neutrality.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10604309967851","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:41.741Z","filers":[{"name":"Roger"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-04T04:57:43.380Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-04T17:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-04T13:00:18.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10604595005640","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:06.704Z","filers":[{"name":"Richard"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-04T01:50:42.856Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-04T15:00:07.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-04T01:50:42.856Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"106032415129923","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:41.741Z","filers":[{"name":"Eddie Rogers"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-03T19:07:10.395Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-04T15:00:07.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-03T19:07:10.395Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"106031285725218","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:41.740Z","filers":[{"name":"Max Cahill"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-03T22:10:01.899Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-04T15:00:07.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-03T22:10:01.899Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. \n\nBut instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n\n\nWithout net neutrality, the FCC doesn’t have the ability to protect us from the abuses of the Internet Service Providers. This means that as we’re facing a major public health crisis, the FCC can only politely beg the ISPs to voluntarily pledge to keep people connected at a time when we’re depending on the Internet for everything—including tele-health appointments, information about COVID-19, and tools to help us stay home and stay safe.\n\nIsn't there more you could do to keep Americans safe? We need net neutrality.","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"106030770618519","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:41.741Z","filers":[{"name":"Tristan Van den Broeke"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-03T23:33:03.744Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-04T15:00:07.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-03T23:33:03.744Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10603282959899","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:15.983Z","filers":[{"name":"Nicole Hilkovitch"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-03T17:41:04.734Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-03T21:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-03T17:41:04.734Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1060325394219","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:56.664Z","filers":[{"name":"Tami Linder"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-03T17:00:37.353Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-03T21:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-03T17:00:37.353Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10603133492487","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:06.704Z","filers":[{"name":"William"},{"name":"Tatum-Mintz"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-03T18:33:38.104Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-03T21:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981276,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":10331,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981251,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-03T18:33:38.104Z","text_data":"Leave net neutrality as it is","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1060322646067","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:56.664Z","filers":[{"name":"Oliver"},{"name":"John"},{"name":"Jr"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-03T09:55:19.375Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-03T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981274,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":13518,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981246,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-03T13:00:08.000Z","text_data":"PRESERVE NET NEUTRALITY AND TITLE II","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10602110498198","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:48.984Z","filers":[{"name":"Maurice Samuels"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-02T23:49:55.765Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-03T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-02T23:49:55.765Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1060349572941","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:48.984Z","filers":[{"name":"Isaac Kuiken"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-03T02:33:34.367Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-03T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981273,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":13518,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981246,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-03T02:33:34.367Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger. During this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills. This isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety. The only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10602876223543","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:56.664Z","filers":[{"name":"Matt Brzezinski"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-02T23:35:40.646Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-03T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-02T23:35:40.646Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10602188287502","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:06.704Z","filers":[{"name":"Caroline"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-02T23:33:35.034Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-03T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-02T23:33:35.034Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10602132942500","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:41.738Z","filers":[{"name":"Marcelo Vazquez"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-02T18:13:10.881Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-02T21:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-02T18:13:10.881Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1060264163449","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:15.983Z","filers":[{"name":"Yaribel Mejia"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-02T15:25:09.713Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-02T19:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-02T15:25:09.713Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"106022497521249","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:15.983Z","filers":[{"name":"Natasha Varner"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-02T07:31:34.195Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-02T17:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-02T13:00:13.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1060155784381","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:15.983Z","filers":[{"name":"Chloe"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-01T22:55:08.137Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-02T15:00:07.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-01T22:55:08.137Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\nWe need net neutrality, it should be illegal to take that away and turn our whole world into politics that you can't get away from.","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10601278606191","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:06:15.983Z","filers":[{"name":"Daniel"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-01T18:37:21.473Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-01T21:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-01T18:37:21.473Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10601232065987","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-18T18:05:47.480Z","filers":[{"name":"Courtney Courtney"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-01T14:27:57.409Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-01T17:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-01T14:27:57.409Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.6","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"105301447301951","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:25.373Z","filers":[{"name":"Patti Batchelder"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-30T14:22:28.848Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-01T17:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-01T13:00:12.000Z","text_data":"The CVID-19  pandemic illustrates graphically how important the internet is.  Even those without internet connections can use those of other people and public facilities.  The internet is a vital as a telephone.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10530790829010","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:15.371Z","filers":[{"name":"Stephanie"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-30T04:53:48.440Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-01T17:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-01T13:00:12.000Z","text_data":"If net neutrality isn't protected, websites that can't afford a higher priority will be unusable from a lack of speed, or cease to exist at all. Innovation will be slowed. People will lose access to decent quality Internet lines to where they live, from companies not wanting to spend money on them, which is ALREADY a problem. Some people will lose their Internet access. The Internet will be bundled into different sections that you have to pay to use, which is wrong, Internet access isn't cable TV access, it's more than that. Your privacy will be invaded without net neutrality, and Internet access will be even more expensive. Getting rid of net neutrality will just end up enormously blocking you from the Internet, make it more expensive, and delve into YOUR PERSONAL privacy.   When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10530385702944","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:19.026Z","filers":[{"name":"John Clewlow"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-30T10:56:11.388Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-01T17:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-01T13:00:12.000Z","text_data":"As a healthcare worker, I can clearly say that when the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"105302780030524","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:25.373Z","filers":[{"name":"McKay"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-30T20:09:40.924Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-01T17:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-01T13:00:12.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"105311837818603","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:25.373Z","filers":[{"name":"Ruth Lima"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-31T14:22:26.138Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-01T17:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-01T13:00:12.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10530155899028","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:19.026Z","filers":[{"name":"JAMES LINDGREN"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-30T07:13:04.512Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-01T17:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-01T13:00:12.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10530907124860","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:15.371Z","filers":[{"name":"William McMakin"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-30T18:45:41.626Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-01T17:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-01T13:00:12.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10601195789505","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:19.026Z","filers":[{"name":"Marcelo Vazquez"}],"date_submission":"2020-06-01T00:46:24.314Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-01T17:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-01T13:00:12.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10531610712877","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:17.369Z","filers":[{"name":"Shanovia \"Navee\" Escoe"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-31T01:10:36.009Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-01T17:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-01T13:00:12.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1053098541050","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:21.167Z","filers":[{"name":"William McMakin"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-30T05:05:04.812Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-01T17:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-06-01T13:00:12.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10529126846838","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:15.371Z","filers":[{"name":"Andy"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-29T23:13:33.486Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-01T15:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-29T23:13:33.486Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052972789873","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:21.167Z","filers":[{"name":"Shanovia Navee Escoe"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-29T22:46:28.768Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-01T15:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-29T22:46:28.768Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10530101614130","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:25.373Z","filers":[{"name":"Ibn-Umar Abbasparker"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-30T03:18:25.488Z","date_disseminated":"2020-06-01T15:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-30T03:18:25.488Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052917804490","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:17.368Z","filers":[{"name":"Brad Schulz"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-29T07:15:34.941Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-29T17:00:09.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-29T13:00:07.000Z","text_data":"Tell Ajit that we know what he’s doing. Internet access should be like electricity and other utilities to your home and unfiltered and unfiltered ","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10528197248177","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:17.368Z","filers":[{"name":"Damon"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-28T21:33:06.034Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-29T15:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-28T21:33:06.034Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"105292979116448","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:20.723Z","filers":[{"name":"Brian"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-29T00:42:07.691Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-29T15:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981248,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":16625,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981221,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-29T00:42:07.691Z","text_data":"Preserve NET NEUTRALITY and TITLE 2!!! Please.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"105281062122894","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:15.370Z","filers":[{"name":"paul"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-28T21:40:54.400Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-29T15:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981246,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":16625,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981221,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-28T21:40:54.400Z","text_data":"need free or low cost internet-city-state-country  We all need it.  Uesd to be you could get info from a book.  now the only way is internet.  The monopolies that run the access to use the internet charge higher and higher fees .  I use internet for email and surfing for info,  I am being charged so others can play games or download movies,  I do neither","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10529984224185","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:25.372Z","filers":[{"name":"Karen Habitzreuther"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-29T02:42:59.188Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-29T15:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-29T02:42:59.188Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10528035757487","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:25.372Z","filers":[{"name":"Shawn Cogen"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-28T20:14:30.474Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-29T15:00:05.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-28T20:14:30.474Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put profits before public safety.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10528156979536","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:00.646Z","filers":[{"name":"James Worthington"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-28T17:40:26.791Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-28T21:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-28T17:40:26.791Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"105281520812886","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:17.368Z","filers":[{"name":"Peter"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-28T17:45:02.832Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-28T21:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-28T17:45:02.832Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052883828495","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:18.820Z","filers":[{"name":"Claire Palmer"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-28T17:18:49.351Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-28T21:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-28T17:18:49.351Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052800095552","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:07.637Z","filers":[{"name":"Aireonna will"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-28T18:24:56.655Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-28T21:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-28T18:24:56.655Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10528040441501","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:18.820Z","filers":[{"name":"AMANDA WOLFSON"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-28T18:18:15.640Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-28T21:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-28T18:18:15.640Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"105281299529649","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:00.646Z","filers":[{"name":"Winston Waldon"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-28T11:27:07.130Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-28T17:00:08.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-28T13:00:06.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"105281731023386","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:00.646Z","filers":[{"name":"DR SUSAN CASWELL"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-28T10:11:39.785Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-28T17:00:08.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-28T13:00:06.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10528212928182","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:25.372Z","filers":[{"name":"Quin McKraken"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-28T14:05:36.393Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-28T17:00:08.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981239,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":16607,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981202,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-28T14:05:36.393Z","text_data":"I support net neutrality and title 2. Do not support the monopoly of people abusing the powers of capitalism.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10528678927820","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:17.368Z","filers":[{"name":"Mark Zeljak"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-28T11:33:22.346Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-28T17:00:08.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-28T13:00:06.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052840788073","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:25.372Z","filers":[{"name":"Brian Woodlief"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-28T12:01:17.973Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-28T17:00:08.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-28T13:00:06.000Z","text_data":"Without net neutrality the FCC doesn’t have the ability to protect us from the abuses of the Internet Service Providers. This means that as we’re facing a major public health crisis, the FCC can only beg the ISPs to voluntarily pledge to keep people connected at a time when we’re depending on the Internet for everything—including tele-health appointments, information about COVID-19, and tools to help us stay home and stay safe.\n\nWe need the Internet now more than ever, and because the FCC repealed net neutrality, we can’t truly depend on it.\n\nNo one should have to worry about whether they can get online right now, if their service will be limited, or if they’ll be able to access certain websites. Not now, and not in the future.\n\nLet’s keep fighting for a free and open Internet for everyone.","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052821806267","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:17.368Z","filers":[{"name":"Karen Lee Saylor"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-28T07:09:45.669Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-28T17:00:08.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-28T13:00:06.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"105283070716585","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:07.637Z","filers":[{"name":"B. R. Lemonik"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-28T13:12:38.019Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-28T17:00:08.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-28T13:12:38.019Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"REPLY TO COMMENTS","short":"REPLY COMM","id":89,"abbreviation":"RC"},"attachments":[],"documents":[{"filename":"OTI Communications Marketplace Report Reply Comments.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10527257628748/1","description":""},{"filename":"OTI Community Broadband Report.pdf","src":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10527257628748/2","description":""}],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10527257628748","total_page_count":47,"lawfirms":[],"date_disseminated":"2020-05-28T15:00:03.000Z","@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"20200227038754","name":"20-60","bureau_code":"OEA","description":"Office of Economics and Analytics Seeks Comment on the State of Competition in the Communications Marketplace","description_display":"Office of Economics and Analytics Seeks Comment on the State of Competition in the Communications Marketplace","bureau_name":"Office of Economics And Analytics"},{"id_proceeding":"2019112102751","name":"19-138","bureau_code":"OET","description":"Use of the 5.850-5.925 GHz Band","description_display":"Use of the 5.850-5.925 GHz Band","bureau_name":"Office of Engineering & Technology"},{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"},{"id_proceeding":"2020020772072","name":"20-36","bureau_code":"OET","description":"Unlicensed White Space Device Operations in the Television Bands","description_display":"Unlicensed White Space Device Operations in the Television Bands","bureau_name":"Office of Engineering & Technology"}],"date_received":"2020-05-27T22:44:04.920Z","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":0,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:07.637Z","filers":[{"name":"New America's Open Technology Institute"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-27T22:44:04.920Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"presented_to":[],"entity":"Filer","authors":[{"name":"Amir Nasr"},{"name":"Michael Calabrese"}],"_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052863947972","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:10.288Z","filers":[{"name":"Lettieri"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-28T01:56:42.897Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-28T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-28T01:56:42.897Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality at the behest of big telecom it put public safety in danger!\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052792750721","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:00.646Z","filers":[{"name":"Jennifer Hannaford"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-27T20:46:21.944Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-28T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-27T20:46:21.943Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052855003593","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:17.368Z","filers":[{"name":"Ben Hirlston"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-28T02:43:28.523Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-28T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-28T02:43:28.523Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052872873505","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:10.288Z","filers":[{"name":"Daphne"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-28T01:11:19.946Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-28T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-28T01:11:19.946Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"105272875806936","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:00.646Z","filers":[{"name":"Beth S Grossman"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-27T22:36:51.458Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-28T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-27T22:36:51.456Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10528545902342","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:25.372Z","filers":[{"name":"David Carnese"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-28T02:27:33.870Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-28T15:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-28T02:27:33.870Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10527033100351","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:16.995Z","filers":[{"name":"Tracy Ann Strickland"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-27T18:58:11.684Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-27T21:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-27T18:58:11.684Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"105270080312385","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:20.722Z","filers":[{"name":"Lowber"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-27T17:40:24.686Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-27T21:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-27T17:40:24.686Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10527177660779","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:25.372Z","filers":[{"name":"Freddy vences"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-27T16:36:37.648Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-27T19:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-27T16:36:37.647Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10527085922000","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:16.995Z","filers":[{"name":"Gregory Morgan"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-27T15:21:24.908Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-27T19:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-27T15:21:24.908Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"105270107327035","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:16.995Z","filers":[{"name":"Kathleen McQuaid"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-27T16:11:38.984Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-27T19:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-27T16:11:38.984Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10527106235812","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:16.995Z","filers":[{"name":"mary bartlett"},{"name":"stephen bartlett"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-27T15:18:48.074Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-27T19:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"id_proceeding":"301759","name":"17-108","bureau_code":"WC","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","bureau_name":"Wireline Competition Bureau"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-27T15:18:48.074Z","text_data":"I believe that we need a return to the 2015 Open Internet Rule. Net neutrality is critical to closing the digital divide and bringing internet access for all.  This is a main source of information for all citizens and it needs to be accessible to all.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10527162358321","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:07.637Z","filers":[{"name":"Rebecca Pecor"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-27T16:50:40.597Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-27T19:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981222,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":16595,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981189,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-27T16:50:40.597Z","text_data":"I support strong net neutrality backed by title 2 oversight of isps.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10527592906682","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:07.637Z","filers":[{"name":"Dr. L. Hunt"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-27T16:37:21.471Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-27T19:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-27T16:37:21.471Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052708786184","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:10.288Z","filers":[{"name":"Brandon Christoffers"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-27T16:59:01.044Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-27T19:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-27T16:59:01.043Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10527992929650","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:10.288Z","filers":[{"name":"Patti"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-27T16:00:20.913Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-27T19:00:04.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-27T16:00:20.913Z","text_data":"Net Neutrality is vital!","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052752484660","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:10.288Z","filers":[{"name":"Bleifeld"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-27T06:00:34.968Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-27T17:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-27T13:00:13.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"105272189608158","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:25.371Z","filers":[{"name":"Lorcan Doull"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-27T05:27:36.221Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-27T17:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981213,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":16601,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981185,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-27T13:00:13.000Z","text_data":"I refuse to have my internet access and/or speed reduced or hindered in ANY way by my ISP.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"105271129010117","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:25.371Z","filers":[{"name":"Jordan Johnson"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-27T08:13:18.503Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-27T17:00:06.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-27T13:00:13.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10526306509968","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:10.288Z","filers":[{"name":"Lynne Cruz"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-26T22:25:59.352Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-27T15:00:10.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T22:25:59.352Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"105262949427402","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:25.371Z","filers":[{"name":"Max Towey"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-26T22:49:15.298Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-27T15:00:10.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T22:49:15.298Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052797389816","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:25.371Z","filers":[{"name":"Debbie McCarthy"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-27T02:18:50.712Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-27T15:00:10.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-27T02:18:50.712Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052694476397","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:00.646Z","filers":[{"name":"Jim Kippen"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-26T23:36:48.511Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-27T15:00:10.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T23:36:48.511Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"105262224512546","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:10.288Z","filers":[{"name":"William McMakin"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-26T17:42:50.664Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T21:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T17:42:50.664Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052673489249","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:07.637Z","filers":[{"name":"Scott Wilson"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-26T17:11:52.978Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T21:00:03.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T17:11:52.978Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052656373890","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:16.995Z","filers":[{"name":"Linda Moore"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-26T16:49:06.827Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T19:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T16:49:06.827Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052616690665","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:07.637Z","filers":[{"name":"Erica Stanojevic"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-26T16:34:27.845Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T19:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T16:34:27.845Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10526825920277","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:10.288Z","filers":[{"name":"Denise Lytle"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-26T14:24:00.044Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T14:24:00.044Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10526992916974","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:07.636Z","filers":[{"name":"Karen Lund"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-26T13:53:44.338Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:53:44.338Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10526293454616","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:16.995Z","filers":[{"name":"Kris schneider"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-26T13:04:49.817Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:04:49.817Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put put the public good and future of our nation in jeopardy.\n\nAs a worker for a major telecommunications company, I see first hand how concerns of budgets and stock prices trump common sense and servicing the public at large on a daily basis. Many homes do not have access to reliable internet service, and even more do not have access to the minimum standard of 10/1 bandwidth. Internet service has near completely replaced landline phone as the essential communications service of both homes and businesses, and its available needs to be mandated, and its pricing regulated.\n\nRegulation adds assurances to restoration of service, as well as recourse for public complaint. While most metropolitan areas have numerous providers available, drive 20 minutes out of town, and you are lucky if one terrestrial service is available. Companies are looking at the most bang for their buck, along with how many birds can we kill with one stone. As such, rural areas get ignored, and urban low income housing gets new services available. New neighborhoods are being built, and no terrestrial services being put in, because servicing them is not mandated, and companies are setting their own pie in the sky qualifications to build networks. \nCellular has been toted time and again as the end all and be all, with every new generation of technology. The bottom line is cellular is the most easily disrupted signal on a mass scale. A simple home built ham radio transmitter can disrupt cellular and wifi frequencies in an area. A police patrol cars radar disrupts satellite frequencies. Hardline connections to homes and business need to be mandated, and backhauls maintained. Cellular is great on the go, but with bandwidth demands rising, it isn't going to keep up. \nI recently streamed a 4k blu ray that i purchased, from a private system in my home to another tv. The bandwidth demand median was 87 Mbps. Just let thst sink in. 87 Mbps for one program. So for a family of four, home bandwidth would need to be 400 Mbps. Now add their home security system, video doorbells, smart home appliances, cellular devices updating social messaging feeds and preloading future 4k and 8k videos. How many homes and business have a 1 Gbps connection available? \nRegulation has forced companies to innovate and find better ways to service customers while remaining profitable, and to rehabilitate aging networks to keeps services working. A lack of regulation has led to aging networks that fail, and companies deciding it is more profitable to leave customers out of service until they cancel, and then tell them service is not available when they find no other option exists. \n\nSecondly, without regulation, what is to stop your ISP from sending a small note on page seven of the ebill you don't read, saying that in X number of days, your monthly usage calculation method will change to being based on types of usage. You can use 30 hours of streaming, but get unlimited hours of their streaming service, giving that provider an unfair advantage over other services. What is stop Comcast from saying all NBC Universal content and websites will only be available over comcast internet? Or to stop AT&T from saying their internet customers can only access news outlets they own?\nWho needs to lobby congress when you control what your customers see and hear about candiates come election time? \n\nDuring this time of change and technological transformation, open access to all content should be as essential as the first ammendment. Before our nation winds up looking like a 1980s futuristic movie, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. \nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10526905728171","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:25.371Z","filers":[{"name":"Anthony Oles"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-26T14:44:58.716Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T17:00:02.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T14:44:58.716Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10522142107690","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:07.636Z","filers":[{"name":"Janice Jipping"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-22T23:15:12.796Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-22T23:15:12.795Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\nThe ability to control the American People's Privacy must be a strong intoxicating source of control and pleasure to the swamp in DC. I'm not happy with Pres.Trump . His platform is to help the working/poor classes of Americans, who cannot pay for services. Let alone pay for extra megabytes.\nThe fact that Pai is formal Verizon Lawyer, who dis-allowed the firemen to use extra megabytes while fighting a fire, I find that when you bully- offer more services, for prices that can't be paid by lower economic Americans. Is insulting to your pledge to help in taking care of ALL Americans.\nShame on you Pai, and Mr Trump too.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10525088067130","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:00.646Z","filers":[{"name":"Nancy Siegele"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-25T16:52:14.474Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"105241895218659","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:00.646Z","filers":[{"name":"S. Ford"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-24T20:28:27.938Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981169,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":16476,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981060,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"Net neutrality forever.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052556708136","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:00.646Z","filers":[{"name":"kimberly"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-25T01:12:18.537Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10525264231433","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:00.646Z","filers":[{"name":"Jenny Michel"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-25T14:10:08.562Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10523634402379","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:07.636Z","filers":[{"name":"Jose Galvez"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-23T04:01:49.078Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10523213549008","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:07.636Z","filers":[{"name":"Corinna Komenda"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-23T17:46:53.635Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10524199434151","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:07.636Z","filers":[{"name":"Jordan Kazakov"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-24T04:48:05.809Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10523305102156","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:16.995Z","filers":[{"name":"rose"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-23T05:12:14.116Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052236679170","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:16.995Z","filers":[{"name":"Keisha mayo"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-22T21:20:37.985Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-22T21:20:37.985Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"105222833717588","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:16.995Z","filers":[{"name":"Lorena navarrete"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-22T22:41:13.503Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-22T22:41:13.503Z","text_data":"good","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10522583926360","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:16.995Z","filers":[{"name":"Yigbe Zayzay"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-22T19:30:58.799Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-22T19:30:58.799Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052334175777","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:10.287Z","filers":[{"name":"Steve s"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-23T21:14:12.760Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10524244769769","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:10.287Z","filers":[{"name":"Bryer Marnin"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-24T01:29:46.119Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"105240699012152","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:10.287Z","filers":[{"name":"CLARID MUTCHLER"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-24T17:07:53.440Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10525127160761","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:10.287Z","filers":[{"name":"Brennan J Baranska"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-25T02:23:38.016Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"Frontier\nAnyone else’s internet keep dropping throughout the day?\n\n7 May · 59 neighborhoods in General\nCommentComment\n53\nJackie Muto\nJackie Muto, Mandarin Lakes\nYes... but we have been having that problem for months.  Have called Frontier numerous times... never gets resolved! 😠\n8 May\nKish Gami\nKish Gami, Canopy Apartments\nNo issue with my Frontier Fios in Citrus Park. Could be a localized issue seen as your both in Mandarin lakes.\n8 May\nKish Gami\nKish Gami, Canopy Apartments\nMy Frontier Fios has been flawless since last june when I upgraded to 500/500 from 100/100, even during the stay at home period. 5 years now with Verizon/Frontier and I call up every 12 months to renew my discounts and no issues with customers service. Treat them how you want to be treated and they will help you.\n16 May\nBrian Maday\nBrian Maday, Northdale\nNo problems with south-west part of Northdale - upgrade to high-speed (500 mbpos and stream TV - solid as a rock.\n17 May\nJoe Baran\nAdd a reply...\nAdd a reply...\nVictoria Mowrey\nVictoria Mowrey, Northdale\nWe've been having issues streaming shows that are dropped in the middle of the show & cannot finish till the next day. Also after 3-4 pm the internet runs at a snails pace.  We're going back to Spectrum true we had problems with them too but not as bad.\n8 May\nKristin Nalewajek\nKristin Nalewajek, Mandarin Lakes\nWe just switched to Spectrum after being with Verizon/Frontier for 15 years. Never had an issue when it was Verizon.\n8 May\n\n\nSee 5 more replies\nVictoria Mowrey\nVictoria Mowrey, Northdale\nI've heard they are filing bankruptcy???\n8 May\nLisa Owen\nLisa Owen, Sugarwood Grove\nIn April, they did.  https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2020/04/frontier-files-for-bankruptcy-says-its-broadband-service-wont-get-any-worse/\n8 May\nLydia Brown\nLydia Brown, Northdale\nYes and mine is spectrum\n8 May\nSharon Marro\nSharon Marro, Westchase/Citrus Park\nI got rid of spectrum, they are a rip off. I got a 30 day bill 234.00. Wtf I went to Spectrum\n8 May\nVictoria Mowrey\nVictoria Mowrey, Northdale\nYes they were bad too. I guess there's not a truly good cable company 😕\n8 May\nLydia Brown\nLydia Brown, Northdale\nNot any more\n8 May\npaul anderson\npaul anderson, Mandarin Lakes\nAll morning and late last night. I have Spectrum though. Seems like its better now. I haven't lost the connection form Wi-Fi  in 1 hour to hour and a half.\n8 May\npaul anderson\npaul anderson, Mandarin Lakes\nBTW - A little FYI about Frontier in case you don't know. This was reported last month.\nApr 15, 2020 · (Reuters) -\" Frontier Communications Corp has filed for bankruptcy protection in the United States, the high-speed internet company said on Tuesday,\"\n8 May\nCalleen Will\nCalleen Will, Belle Glen\nYes....ugh...\n8 May\nSharon Marro\nSharon Marro, Westchase/Citrus Park\nYes, I saw that.\n8 May\nDiane Reid\nDiane Reid, Citrus Park/Westchase\nI have starting having regular issues with Frontier dropping off, never had issues that I was aware of prior to last month. I am in Citrus Park.\n8 May\nTara Martinez\nTara Martinez, Northdale - Golf Course\nI have too for the last two to three weeks, my kids get kicked out of zoom class and my husband and I get kicked off work programs due to internet dropping\n8 May\n\n\nSee 1 more reply\nBrian Paxson\nBrian Paxson, Woodmont/Preserve/Traditn\nI was just thinking of dropping Spectrum and returning to Frontier bc of this issue.  I hate them both.\n8 May\nWayne Hay\nWayne Hay, Northdale - Golf Course\nWhy are all internet providers bad???\n8 May\nVictoria Mowrey\nVictoria Mowrey, Northdale\nThats a $1000 question!\n8 May\n\n\nSee 1 more reply\nWayne Hay\nWayne Hay, Northdale - Golf Course\nMore like a $1,000,000.00 question\n8 May\nLarry Weatherby\nLarry Weatherby, Greater Northdale\nFrontier has been working fine for us...in Northdale.\n8 May\nWayne Hay\nWayne Hay, Northdale - Golf Course\nI’m in Northdale too but my wi-fi has Always been terrible. Everything is ok.\n8 May\nBrian Maday\nBrian Maday, Northdale\nIf you have one of Frontier's small 'black box \"modem/router (Made by ARRIS), I have found them entirely inadequate for WiFi use. I purchased a TP-LINK also known as an Archer [75]) for $70 from Amazon. It is a TRUE ROUTER with strong WiFi, and set up easily. NOTE: I was going to replace the black junk-box, but Frontier will only provide support their service using THAT BOX!\n8 May\nNorma Stemm\nNorma Stemm, Carrollwood Village Phase III\nNot any problems with Frontier!!!\n8 May\nBeck Perry\nBeck Perry, Lake Keystone\nYes problems spooling on computer and 0-1 bar on phone. Replaced the router, still same problems.\n8 May\nBrian Maday\nBrian Maday, Northdale\nNot too surprised - but keep in mind that your 'Little Black Box' is really TWO things; it is a MODEM and it is a ROUTER. The piece of crap Frontier hands out is a cheap piece of JUNK. It doesn't do Either job well (provide Internet service AND act as a WiFi router).\n8 May\n\n\nSee 3 more replies\nWayne Hay\nWayne Hay, Northdale - Golf Course\nI have also changed routers with zero improvement\n8 May\nLucy Medina\nLucy Medina, Ventana at Carrollwood\nYessssssss\n8 May\nPreetha Bala\nPreetha Bala, Northton Groves\nYes\n8 May\nKarla McCall\nKarla McCall, Carrollwood\nyes, Service is very slow...\n8 May\nDottie Neri\nDottie Neri, Mandarin Lakes\nI have been in Florida since 2011. transplant from RI. The minute I got my internet and cable, I had problems I never had before. My logic tells me that Florida should have better service than the crowded NE area..not so! I have tried all the companies and they all seem to be very unstable. I too \"spool\" at times, get knocked off line, etc etc. In NE all our \"wires\" are on poles and always wonder if that is why its better up there.\n8 May\nJohn Bernick\nJohn Bernick, Country Place\nI am so tired of the buffing and not being able to watch a complete show we have Frontier\n8 May\nMercedes Clark\nMercedes Clark, Carrollwood\nYes!!!  All the money we pay for reruns, old movies, about 8-10 commercials between programming. Now the dropping. Can they off anything the can annoy us?\n10 May\nBrian Maday\nBrian Maday, Northdale\nI am on Frontier - but not under a contract! You might check into using one of the inexpensive \"Streaming devices\" (I use  'roku.com') and CANCELLING your TV with Frontier - switch to a higher-speed Internet-only connection. CALL FRONTIER and ask to speak with \"Customer Retention\" to get action. The world of streaming is a whole new ballgame - and a genuine Money Saver/\n10 May\nJoe Baran\nJoe Baran, Carrollwood Meadows\nYES* \nNet neutrality ended on June 11, 2018 thanks to the Cons and the FCC are  voters adverse to understand what the results are ? ... so as ur bandwidth speeds up and down regardless of ur ISP provider Ur dropped ... now if ur providers allowed U  a constant speed of 25Mbps or more there would be know problems thats my Opinion \" we all welcome  explanation\"\nEdited 12 May\nBrian Maday\nBrian Maday, Northdale\nIt would seem that in our 'area' we only (conveniently} have two viable internet selections; Frontier (formerly Verizon) and Spectrum (formerly Bright House, etc.). Frontier was built on fiber optic transmission, While Spectrum was classical \"Wired\" cable; they have been upgrading to Fiber as well - but I have no idea how much is complete. Frontier ends its 'home connection' in a BOX that convert optical signals back into coax connections or possibly a 'telephone RJ-45' connection (regular phone cords use RJ-11 Jacks, with only Four-color plugs and jacks.). Frontier users will find the converter box where their service enter the home - could be inside, most are outside. Being on frontier for many years, I have only been 'dropped' during POWER OUTAGES. The SPEED of my service is constantly very good. I am signed up for 500KBS, and I believe that pure \"Internet congestion\" occurs at other than by YOUR PROVIDER! Connecting to ANYTHING, there is no guidance on how many servers, located who-knows-where are involved. THAT is the greatest problem with Internet speeds... it is OUTSIDE OF YOUR PROVIDER! That is my opinion, having spent a great deal of my working career in the Communications sector. I welcome other opinions or facts that show I am wrong.\n12 May\n\n\nSee 2 more replies\nKaren Bazo\nKaren Bazo, Westchase/Citrus Park\nFrontier here. Had no real  Problems until stay-at-home order went into effect and kids started learning from home full time.... called customer service and requested a new router/modem to exchange and the problem is less severe-- for now. Also another great suggestion I have heard is to connect a ethernet cable directly from your computer to the router/modem. (Just ordered a cable, haven't been hard wired for so long almost forgot how!) Speed matters, too, so upgrade if you can.\n12 May\nChris Cook\nChris Cook, Northdale - Golf Course\nFYI - Frontier recently filed bankruptcy.\n\nhttps://www.usnews.com/news/technology/articles/2020-04-14/frontier-communications-files-for-bankruptcy-protection\n12 May\nBrian Maday\nBrian Maday, Northdale\nThey filed under chapter 11 for RE-ORGANIZATION! That is a \"Bankruptcy\" law, but has little to do (in Frontier's case) of making their service \"go away\". Chapter 11 simply provides protection to Frontier of being shut down until management can plan and execute new directions, and (like many companies these days) get through the COVID-19 pandemic.\n12 Mayy our exspensive tv packages are worthless without NN","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052202878727","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:10.077Z","filers":[{"name":"Arlene Amador"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-22T19:18:37.065Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-22T19:18:37.065Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"105221133720321","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:10.077Z","filers":[{"name":"Matt Silverstein"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-22T19:29:48.247Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-22T19:29:48.241Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052259304560","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:10.077Z","filers":[{"name":"Justine Berti"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-22T21:04:08.961Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-22T21:04:08.961Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10525110560116","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:10.287Z","filers":[{"name":"Daniel Poore"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-25T19:36:09.420Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981188,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":16476,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981060,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"iam in strong support of net neutrality. title 2 must remain an oversight for all ISPs wired and wireless.","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052295575100","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:25.371Z","filers":[{"name":"Mary Ann and Frank G r a f f a g n i n o"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-22T22:09:34.318Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-22T22:09:34.318Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put publication safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\nTHIS IS THE RIGHT, FAIR, JUST, HUMANE AND HEALTHY ACTION TO TAKE ","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10523041108022","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:25.371Z","filers":[{"name":"Rick Nguyen"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-23T01:47:44.274Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-23T01:47:44.274Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"105231674626096","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:25.371Z","filers":[{"name":"Seth"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-23T02:24:39.984Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-23T02:24:39.984Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052470318342","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:25.371Z","filers":[{"name":"Jessica"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-24T03:34:11.588Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10525174753062","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:25.371Z","filers":[{"name":"Craig Liggett"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-25T20:04:11.871Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10523688329600","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:07.636Z","filers":[{"name":"Benjamin Strauss"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-23T22:50:23.096Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"105252253326815","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:07.636Z","filers":[{"name":"Brennan J Baranska"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-25T01:23:47.222Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"Ajit.pai@fcc.gov\nChairman Ajit Pai\n\nThere's a soothing catharsis in the idea that good guys (NN people) are every bit as capable as bad guys (big money ISP’s) of raining hellfire down on their enemies.\n\nI wish the Internet had a bunch of equalizers (NN). Yes, sometimes you must do something bad for good to win, THANKS FOR UR CONSIDERATION OF NN with this said\n\nI use my Internet service for only two things:\n1) Sending IP packets to IP addresses of my choice\n2) Receiving IP packets sent to my IP address\n\nIt shouldn't matter whether those packets represent audio data, video data, or random noise\nIt shouldn't matter who I'm sending to or receiving from.\nData is data. ISPs should be classified as common carriers\n\nAn analog telephone system was likewise used for only two things:\n1) Sending analog signals to phone numbers of my choice\n2) Receiving analog signals sent to my phone number\n\nIt shouldn't matter if the signal was generated by sound waves striking a microphone, or digital data modulated over a waveform by a modem (see Carterfone1 case)\nIt shouldn't matter who I'm calling or being called by.\nSignal is signal. Phone companies should be classified as common carriers\n\nThe reason why people are concerned is that many of the ISPs (particularly those who are also Cable TV providers and mobile phone co. gees what a mess) are trying to turn the Internet into something that resembles the Cable TV model. That is what we're fighting against. We don't want the Cable TV style \"get whatever content the Cable company chooses to give you\" model. We want the telephone style \"call whoever you want, and say what you want\" model, which is how the Internet has traditionally worked, and how it was designed to work.\n\nThank you\nBrennan Baranska\nbjbaranska@hotmail.com\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052598908163","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:07.636Z","filers":[{"name":"Mary Anne Paul"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-25T01:15:12.761Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052420362689","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:07.636Z","filers":[{"name":"Sam Pickren"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-24T19:18:58.690Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"105260600401214","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:07.636Z","filers":[{"name":"Gary Kuba"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-26T08:18:02.856Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\nNo one should have to worry about whether they can get online or if their service will be limited.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"1052645236389","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:07.636Z","filers":[{"name":"mic demar"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-26T09:18:03.255Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981199,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":16476,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981060,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"I support strong net neutrality backed by title 2 oversite of ISPs","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052362109443","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:10.287Z","filers":[{"name":"Nate Ayal"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-23T15:15:27.231Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10523132252598","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:10.287Z","filers":[{"name":"Mary Peterson"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-23T23:04:59.178Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.  I use the internet constantly and have noticed a slowing in speed and interruptions in my connection since net neutrality has been repealed.  This directly impacts those who are educated online.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n\n\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052212058803","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:10.077Z","filers":[{"name":"Lauren McWilliams"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-22T20:13:50.295Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-22T20:13:50.295Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"105220219216646","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:10.077Z","filers":[{"name":"Amanda"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-22T21:11:41.314Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-22T21:11:41.314Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052377899149","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:00.646Z","filers":[{"name":"Spencer"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-23T14:42:53.956Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"105262546619255","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:00.646Z","filers":[{"name":"Rivka Nipper"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-26T10:29:15.826Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"105241343701659","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:00.646Z","filers":[{"name":"Gloria Hafner"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-24T14:57:36.010Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"105240902223909","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:00.646Z","filers":[{"name":"Ellen Fox"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-24T07:55:50.005Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10525258938520","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:00.646Z","filers":[{"name":"Jennine Carmichael"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-25T23:48:01.724Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"105241408219051","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:16.995Z","filers":[{"name":"Debra Gary Hendricks"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-24T14:41:38.808Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10525513712606","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:16.995Z","filers":[{"name":"Genevieve Miller"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-25T16:29:32.747Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10524025381051","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:16.995Z","filers":[{"name":"Tristan Morris"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-24T19:44:42.979Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10523246727391","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:16.995Z","filers":[{"name":"Kryder"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-23T03:14:41.732Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-23T03:14:41.732Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052207607035","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:07.636Z","filers":[{"name":"B Robins"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-22T21:46:15.918Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-22T21:46:15.918Z","text_data":"Keep Net Neutrality\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"105232177022771","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:20.722Z","filers":[{"name":"Alina"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-23T01:09:56.951Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-23T01:09:56.951Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052318541798","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:20.722Z","filers":[{"name":"Robert Heyl"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-23T03:56:33.886Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-23T03:56:33.886Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10522504209893","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:25.371Z","filers":[{"name":"Samantha Turetsky"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-22T19:12:43.117Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-22T19:12:43.117Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10523580710503","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:25.371Z","filers":[{"name":"Garvett"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-23T21:21:16.218Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10524370811118","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:25.371Z","filers":[{"name":"Jessica"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-24T03:34:42.340Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10524130849453","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:25.371Z","filers":[{"name":"John"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-24T06:34:23.567Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10523852607671","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:25.371Z","filers":[{"name":"Tony Schinkowitch"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-23T03:50:11.179Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-23T03:50:11.179Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10525203322301","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:07.636Z","filers":[{"name":"Brennan J Baranska"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-25T02:24:47.683Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"Frontier\nAnyone else’s internet keep dropping throughout the day?\n\n7 May · 59 neighborhoods in General\nCommentComment\n53\nJackie Muto\nJackie Muto, Mandarin Lakes\nYes... but we have been having that problem for months.  Have called Frontier numerous times... never gets resolved! 😠\n8 May\nKish Gami\nKish Gami, Canopy Apartments\nNo issue with my Frontier Fios in Citrus Park. Could be a localized issue seen as your both in Mandarin lakes.\n8 May\nKish Gami\nKish Gami, Canopy Apartments\nMy Frontier Fios has been flawless since last june when I upgraded to 500/500 from 100/100, even during the stay at home period. 5 years now with Verizon/Frontier and I call up every 12 months to renew my discounts and no issues with customers service. Treat them how you want to be treated and they will help you.\n16 May\nBrian Maday\nBrian Maday, Northdale\nNo problems with south-west part of Northdale - upgrade to high-speed (500 mbpos and stream TV - solid as a rock.\n17 May\nJoe Baran\nAdd a reply...\nAdd a reply...\nVictoria Mowrey\nVictoria Mowrey, Northdale\nWe've been having issues streaming shows that are dropped in the middle of the show & cannot finish till the next day. Also after 3-4 pm the internet runs at a snails pace.  We're going back to Spectrum true we had problems with them too but not as bad.\n8 May\nKristin Nalewajek\nKristin Nalewajek, Mandarin Lakes\nWe just switched to Spectrum after being with Verizon/Frontier for 15 years. Never had an issue when it was Verizon.\n8 May\n\n\nSee 5 more replies\nVictoria Mowrey\nVictoria Mowrey, Northdale\nI've heard they are filing bankruptcy???\n8 May\nLisa Owen\nLisa Owen, Sugarwood Grove\nIn April, they did.  https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2020/04/frontier-files-for-bankruptcy-says-its-broadband-service-wont-get-any-worse/\n8 May\nLydia Brown\nLydia Brown, Northdale\nYes and mine is spectrum\n8 May\nSharon Marro\nSharon Marro, Westchase/Citrus Park\nI got rid of spectrum, they are a rip off. I got a 30 day bill 234.00. Wtf I went to Spectrum\n8 May\nVictoria Mowrey\nVictoria Mowrey, Northdale\nYes they were bad too. I guess there's not a truly good cable company 😕\n8 May\nLydia Brown\nLydia Brown, Northdale\nNot any more\n8 May\npaul anderson\npaul anderson, Mandarin Lakes\nAll morning and late last night. I have Spectrum though. Seems like its better now. I haven't lost the connection form Wi-Fi  in 1 hour to hour and a half.\n8 May\npaul anderson\npaul anderson, Mandarin Lakes\nBTW - A little FYI about Frontier in case you don't know. This was reported last month.\nApr 15, 2020 · (Reuters) -\" Frontier Communications Corp has filed for bankruptcy protection in the United States, the high-speed internet company said on Tuesday,\"\n8 May\nCalleen Will\nCalleen Will, Belle Glen\nYes....ugh...\n8 May\nSharon Marro\nSharon Marro, Westchase/Citrus Park\nYes, I saw that.\n8 May\nDiane Reid\nDiane Reid, Citrus Park/Westchase\nI have starting having regular issues with Frontier dropping off, never had issues that I was aware of prior to last month. I am in Citrus Park.\n8 May\nTara Martinez\nTara Martinez, Northdale - Golf Course\nI have too for the last two to three weeks, my kids get kicked out of zoom class and my husband and I get kicked off work programs due to internet dropping\n8 May\n\n\nSee 1 more reply\nBrian Paxson\nBrian Paxson, Woodmont/Preserve/Traditn\nI was just thinking of dropping Spectrum and returning to Frontier bc of this issue.  I hate them both.\n8 May\nWayne Hay\nWayne Hay, Northdale - Golf Course\nWhy are all internet providers bad???\n8 May\nVictoria Mowrey\nVictoria Mowrey, Northdale\nThats a $1000 question!\n8 May\n\n\nSee 1 more reply\nWayne Hay\nWayne Hay, Northdale - Golf Course\nMore like a $1,000,000.00 question\n8 May\nLarry Weatherby\nLarry Weatherby, Greater Northdale\nFrontier has been working fine for us...in Northdale.\n8 May\nWayne Hay\nWayne Hay, Northdale - Golf Course\nI’m in Northdale too but my wi-fi has Always been terrible. Everything is ok.\n8 May\nBrian Maday\nBrian Maday, Northdale\nIf you have one of Frontier's small 'black box \"modem/router (Made by ARRIS), I have found them entirely inadequate for WiFi use. I purchased a TP-LINK also known as an Archer [75]) for $70 from Amazon. It is a TRUE ROUTER with strong WiFi, and set up easily. NOTE: I was going to replace the black junk-box, but Frontier will only provide support their service using THAT BOX!\n8 May\nNorma Stemm\nNorma Stemm, Carrollwood Village Phase III\nNot any problems with Frontier!!!\n8 May\nBeck Perry\nBeck Perry, Lake Keystone\nYes problems spooling on computer and 0-1 bar on phone. Replaced the router, still same problems.\n8 May\nBrian Maday\nBrian Maday, Northdale\nNot too surprised - but keep in mind that your 'Little Black Box' is really TWO things; it is a MODEM and it is a ROUTER. The piece of crap Frontier hands out is a cheap piece of JUNK. It doesn't do Either job well (provide Internet service AND act as a WiFi router).\n8 May\n\n\nSee 3 more replies\nWayne Hay\nWayne Hay, Northdale - Golf Course\nI have also changed routers with zero improvement\n8 May\nLucy Medina\nLucy Medina, Ventana at Carrollwood\nYessssssss\n8 May\nPreetha Bala\nPreetha Bala, Northton Groves\nYes\n8 May\nKarla McCall\nKarla McCall, Carrollwood\nyes, Service is very slow...\n8 May\nDottie Neri\nDottie Neri, Mandarin Lakes\nI have been in Florida since 2011. transplant from RI. The minute I got my internet and cable, I had problems I never had before. My logic tells me that Florida should have better service than the crowded NE area..not so! I have tried all the companies and they all seem to be very unstable. I too \"spool\" at times, get knocked off line, etc etc. In NE all our \"wires\" are on poles and always wonder if that is why its better up there.\n8 May\nJohn Bernick\nJohn Bernick, Country Place\nI am so tired of the buffing and not being able to watch a complete show we have Frontier\n8 May\nMercedes Clark\nMercedes Clark, Carrollwood\nYes!!!  All the money we pay for reruns, old movies, about 8-10 commercials between programming. Now the dropping. Can they off anything the can annoy us?\n10 May\nBrian Maday\nBrian Maday, Northdale\nI am on Frontier - but not under a contract! You might check into using one of the inexpensive \"Streaming devices\" (I use  'roku.com') and CANCELLING your TV with Frontier - switch to a higher-speed Internet-only connection. CALL FRONTIER and ask to speak with \"Customer Retention\" to get action. The world of streaming is a whole new ballgame - and a genuine Money Saver/\n10 May\nJoe Baran\nJoe Baran, Carrollwood Meadows\nYES* \nNet neutrality ended on June 11, 2018 thanks to the Cons and the FCC are  voters adverse to understand what the results are ? ... so as ur bandwidth speeds up and down regardless of ur ISP provider Ur dropped ... now if ur providers allowed U  a constant speed of 25Mbps or more there would be know problems thats my Opinion \" we all welcome  explanation\"\nEdited 12 May\nBrian Maday\nBrian Maday, Northdale\nIt would seem that in our 'area' we only (conveniently} have two viable internet selections; Frontier (formerly Verizon) and Spectrum (formerly Bright House, etc.). Frontier was built on fiber optic transmission, While Spectrum was classical \"Wired\" cable; they have been upgrading to Fiber as well - but I have no idea how much is complete. Frontier ends its 'home connection' in a BOX that convert optical signals back into coax connections or possibly a 'telephone RJ-45' connection (regular phone cords use RJ-11 Jacks, with only Four-color plugs and jacks.). Frontier users will find the converter box where their service enter the home - could be inside, most are outside. Being on frontier for many years, I have only been 'dropped' during POWER OUTAGES. The SPEED of my service is constantly very good. I am signed up for 500KBS, and I believe that pure \"Internet congestion\" occurs at other than by YOUR PROVIDER! Connecting to ANYTHING, there is no guidance on how many servers, located who-knows-where are involved. THAT is the greatest problem with Internet speeds... it is OUTSIDE OF YOUR PROVIDER! That is my opinion, having spent a great deal of my working career in the Communications sector. I welcome other opinions or facts that show I am wrong.\n12 May\n\n\nSee 2 more replies\nKaren Bazo\nKaren Bazo, Westchase/Citrus Park\nFrontier here. Had no real  Problems until stay-at-home order went into effect and kids started learning from home full time.... called customer service and requested a new router/modem to exchange and the problem is less severe-- for now. Also another great suggestion I have heard is to connect a ethernet cable directly from your computer to the router/modem. (Just ordered a cable, haven't been hard wired for so long almost forgot how!) Speed matters, too, so upgrade if you can.\n12 May\nChris Cook\nChris Cook, Northdale - Golf Course\nFYI - Frontier recently filed bankruptcy.\n\nhttps://www.usnews.com/news/technology/articles/2020-04-14/frontier-communications-files-for-bankruptcy-protection\n12 May\nBrian Maday\nBrian Maday, Northdale\nThey filed under chapter 11 for RE-ORGANIZATION! That is a \"Bankruptcy\" law, but has little to do (in Frontier's case) of making their service \"go away\". Chapter 11 simply provides protection to Frontier of being shut down until management can plan and execute new directions, and (like many companies these days) get through the COVID-19 pandemic.\n12 May","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10525166797547","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:07.636Z","filers":[{"name":"Christine Elizabeth Austin"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-25T04:42:35.021Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"105220687717069","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:07.636Z","filers":[{"name":"Lok Hwa"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-22T20:26:28.143Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-22T20:26:28.143Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10522238536637","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:16.995Z","filers":[{"name":"Victor"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-22T21:34:23.168Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-22T21:34:23.168Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10523225803662","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:10.287Z","filers":[{"name":"Kathryn Maier"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-23T15:10:53.887Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052235047258","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:10.287Z","filers":[{"name":"Carol Waldner"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-22T23:00:42.487Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-22T23:00:42.487Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10526062571983","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:00.646Z","filers":[{"name":"Jordan Buan"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-26T03:41:44.213Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T03:41:44.213Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052494227223","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:00.646Z","filers":[{"name":"Kenneth Winberry"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-24T20:01:00.761Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"105240378708639","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:00.646Z","filers":[{"name":"Michiko Takatani"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-24T20:48:32.737Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052410563686","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:00.646Z","filers":[{"name":"Sarah Walling"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-24T23:16:53.749Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052283641244","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:25.371Z","filers":[{"name":"John Ritchie"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-22T19:04:43.393Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-22T19:04:43.393Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052340331233","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:25.371Z","filers":[{"name":"(Mr.,) Clairence Pickens"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-23T01:10:55.161Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-23T01:10:55.161Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10522461420631","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:25.371Z","filers":[{"name":"Tonya Bettis"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-22T23:16:37.542Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-22T23:16:37.542Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10523873915502","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:25.371Z","filers":[{"name":"Sonia Hassan"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-23T10:27:45.221Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10524455508801","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:25.371Z","filers":[{"name":"val"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-24T23:15:06.500Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10526140943266","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:25.371Z","filers":[{"name":"Sydney"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-26T01:16:25.934Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T01:16:25.933Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10525274224721","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:25.371Z","filers":[{"name":"Joan Wiersma"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-25T22:24:12.355Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act. Bring BACK Net Neutrality!\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"105220349606172","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:20.722Z","filers":[{"name":"Leclerc"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-22T21:57:46.724Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-22T21:57:46.724Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10523046310522","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:10.287Z","filers":[{"name":"Robert Cauley"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-23T12:42:36.889Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052324786968","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:10.287Z","filers":[{"name":"Deborah A Fexis"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-23T16:22:10.440Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10524257088814","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:10.287Z","filers":[{"name":"Kathryn Maier"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-24T16:12:07.842Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10522211282053","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:10.077Z","filers":[{"name":"Carole McCarthy"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-22T20:19:41.012Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-22T20:19:41.012Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"105220206408868","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:10.287Z","filers":[{"name":"Terry"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-22T22:22:26.085Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-22T22:22:26.085Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"105250628002394","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:10.287Z","filers":[{"name":"Mary Wilbert"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-25T11:43:14.943Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality, it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, which isn’t possible WITHOUT net neutrality. The FCC SHOULD be allowed to lead efforts ensuring that everyone has critical access to reliable communication networks during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety for their OWN sakes.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act. I ask you to please do the right thing and reinstate net neutrality now!\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10524054616005","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:00.646Z","filers":[{"name":"Greenhill"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-24T13:04:58.976Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"105250733103925","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:00.646Z","filers":[{"name":"Christopher Benjamin"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-25T22:34:51.452Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10523891009549","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:16.995Z","filers":[{"name":"Phyllis"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-23T19:48:38.782Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"105222474615950","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:16.995Z","filers":[{"name":"Brady Watson"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-22T23:00:57.527Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-22T23:00:57.527Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"105221019503526","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:25.371Z","filers":[{"name":"Fantasia"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-22T19:45:44.173Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-22T19:45:44.173Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052382801288","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:25.371Z","filers":[{"name":"Monique Quistorff"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-23T21:32:46.797Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052338528176","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:25.371Z","filers":[{"name":"Mark Fox"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-23T23:05:40.563Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10524096640869","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:25.371Z","filers":[{"name":"Cregger"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-24T21:54:21.020Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10523942904773","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:16.995Z","filers":[{"name":"Mara Hernandez"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-23T05:31:08.756Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10524221964837","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:16.995Z","filers":[{"name":"ROBERT ROARK"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-24T14:45:04.298Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"We paid to build the internet, we paid for the satellites we pay for access, so why should we have to pay extra for the right to use it equally with the elite?  ","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052226791534","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:16.995Z","filers":[{"name":"Debra"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-22T22:12:53.656Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-22T22:12:53.656Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger. Please reinlstate net neutrality.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052284799362","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:16.995Z","filers":[{"name":"Judy Swett"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-22T21:50:25.438Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-22T21:50:25.437Z","text_data":"","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052362308856","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:16.995Z","filers":[{"name":"Brenda Grove"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-23T03:30:35.783Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-23T03:30:35.783Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10522141517924","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:16.995Z","filers":[{"name":"Derrick Koh"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-22T19:32:15.624Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-22T19:32:15.624Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10522200529993","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:16.995Z","filers":[{"name":"Theodore"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-22T19:21:25.638Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-22T19:21:25.638Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"105231496810828","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:10.287Z","filers":[{"name":"Cheryl Bassett"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-23T00:49:05.216Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-23T00:49:05.216Z","text_data":"During all times people need to be able to connect with vital services and loved ones online","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"attachments":[],"documents":[],"bureaus":[],"id_submission":"10525474300716","lawfirms":[],"viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:10.287Z","filers":[{"name":"Daniel Vushaj"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-25T23:07:12.656Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"sunshine_start_date":"2017-12-07T05:00:00.000Z","comment_reply_end_date":null,"_index":"proceedings.new","city":" ","date_initial_decision":null,"date_nprm":null,"id_bureau":" ","id_proceeding":"301759","flag_rulemaking_or_docket":"D","channel":" ","description":"Restoring Internet Freedom","file_number":"","total":23981190,"date_closed":"2099-12-31T23:59:59.999Z","date_designated":null,"date_proceeding_created":"2017-04-26T14:49:35.900Z","callsign":" ","flag_internet_file":"Y","bureau":{"code":"WC","name":"Wireline Competition Bureau","edocs_bureau_code":"WCB"},"id_state":null,"sunshine_end_date":"2017-12-14T04:59:59.000Z","filed_by":"Aleta.Bowers","date_archived":null,"face_card_id":"301759","flag_historical_data_exists":"N","consolidated_proceeding_id":null,"date_public_notice":null,"date_rule_board_decision":null,"flag_archived":"N","flag_small_business_impact":null,"description_display":"Restoring Internet Freedom","comment_end_date":null,"applicant_name":" ","date_effective":null,"comment_start_date":null,"filingStatus":"OPENALL","date_commission_decision":null,"flag_exparte_allowed":"Y","name":"17-108","date_oral_argument":null,"date_reporting_and_order":null,"date_hot_docket":null,"recent_filings":16476,"days":30,"location":" ","total_disseminated":23981060,"rule_section":" ","comment_reply_start_date":null}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"I support strong net neutrality backed by Title II oversight of ISP's","authors":[],"_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10524023678636","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:10.287Z","filers":[{"name":"Nancy Rodgers"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-24T20:20:46.463Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052474013987","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:10.287Z","filers":[{"name":"Darin Giammusso"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-24T18:40:07.702Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10523026780635","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:10.287Z","filers":[{"name":"Rebecca Townsend"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-23T12:19:06.818Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052458633822","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:10.287Z","filers":[{"name":"Jessica Godinez"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-24T01:35:08.784Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10525687419890","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:00.646Z","filers":[{"name":"Eric Dallin"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-25T16:38:38.490Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052302698621","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:00.646Z","filers":[{"name":"natasha sansom"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-23T16:46:44.534Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10524183470359","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:00.646Z","filers":[{"name":"Karen Hertz"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-24T07:04:15.294Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"1052405824911","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:00.646Z","filers":[{"name":"Kimberly Rigano"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-24T21:24:52.560Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10525810003386","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:00.646Z","filers":[{"name":"Danielle Wilson"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-25T19:07:29.722Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10523353230941","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:07.636Z","filers":[{"name":"Brunson"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-23T22:40:15.679Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T13:00:11.000Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10522030081950","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:07.636Z","filers":[{"name":"Sara-Jane Wilson"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-22T22:05:20.069Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-22T22:05:20.069Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10522283862181","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:07.636Z","filers":[{"name":"Jose Ruiz"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-22T20:22:07.965Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-22T20:22:07.965Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10523025366676","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:07.636Z","filers":[{"name":"Mitchell Miller"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-23T03:35:34.221Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-23T03:35:34.221Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"105262410905409","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:20.722Z","filers":[{"name":"Lukas Teetzen"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-26T00:15:53.025Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-26T00:15:53.024Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"},{"submissiontype":{"description":"COMMENT","short":"COMMENT","id":7,"abbreviation":"CO"},"id_submission":"10522120669346","viewingstatus":{"description":"Unrestricted","id":"10"},"express_comment":1,"@timestamp":"2021-12-17T22:17:20.722Z","filers":[{"name":"Brandon Christoffers"}],"date_submission":"2020-05-22T21:07:08.676Z","date_disseminated":"2020-05-26T15:00:16.000Z","filingstatus":{"description":"DISSEMINATED","id":30},"@version":"1","proceedings":[{"name":"17-108"},{"name":"17-287"},{"name":"11-42"}],"presented_to":[],"date_received":"2020-05-22T21:07:08.676Z","text_data":"When the FCC repealed net neutrality it put public safety in danger.\n\nDuring this health crisis, we need to be able to rely on a free and open Internet, but this isn’t possible without net neutrality. The FCC should be leading efforts to ensure that everyone has reliable communication networks that are critical during times of crisis. But instead, the FCC is only able to ask Internet Service Providers to make voluntary pledges to keep people connected, to not throttle service, and to provide financial support to those who can’t afford their Internet bills.\n\nThis isn’t the first time we’ve seen how the repeal of net neutrality harms public safety. In 2018, during the California wildfires, Verizon throttled Internet service for firefighters, putting their communications on the line when they needed it most. There is no reason to trust ISPs to do the right thing now, when we’ve already seen that they’re willing to disregard public safety.\n\nThe only way to address these issues, and ensure a free and open Internet for everyone, is to reinstate the net neutrality protections and basic FCC oversight under Title II of the Communications Act.\n","_index":"filings.2020.5","exparte_or_late_filed":"N"}],"aggregations":{"express_comment":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":1,"doc_count":23952021},{"key":0,"doc_count":13612}]},"bureaus_description":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":65,"buckets":[{"key":"Wireline Competition Bureau","doc_count":442382},{"key":"General (Multiple Bureaus)","doc_count":4495},{"key":"Media Bureau","doc_count":178},{"key":"Wireless Telecommunications Bureau","doc_count":165},{"key":"Enforcement Bureau","doc_count":66},{"key":"Private Radio Bureau","doc_count":64},{"key":"Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau","doc_count":47},{"key":"Public Safety and Homeland Security","doc_count":41},{"key":"Office of Engineering and Technology","doc_count":39},{"key":"International Bureau","doc_count":29}]},"submissiontype_description":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":1,"sum_other_doc_count":258,"buckets":[{"key":"COMMENT","doc_count":23980204},{"key":"COMPLAINT","doc_count":601},{"key":"NOTICE OF EXPARTE","doc_count":382},{"key":"OPPOSITION","doc_count":183},{"key":"LETTER","doc_count":169},{"key":"REPLY TO COMMENTS","doc_count":158},{"key":"APPEAL","doc_count":45},{"key":"OTHER","doc_count":24},{"key":"STATEMENT FOR THE RECORD","doc_count":24},{"key":"REPLY","doc_count":21}]},"exparte_or_late_filed":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"N","doc_count":7}]},"is_staff_upload":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":1,"doc_count":228},{"key":0,"doc_count":26}]},"proceedings_name":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":15,"sum_other_doc_count":1265,"buckets":[{"key":"17-108","doc_count":23982069},{"key":"11-42","doc_count":16864},{"key":"17-287","doc_count":16849},{"key":"14-28","doc_count":4432},{"key":"08-171","doc_count":428},{"key":"23-320","doc_count":89},{"key":"09-191","doc_count":82},{"key":"17-105","doc_count":54},{"key":"93-132","doc_count":54},{"key":"10-101","doc_count":28}]},"filingstatus_description":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"DISSEMINATED","doc_count":23982069}]},"filers_name":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":2820,"sum_other_doc_count":24075625,"buckets":[{"key":"Net Neutrality","doc_count":21645},{"key":"net neutrality","doc_count":7911},{"key":"The Internet","doc_count":7468},{"key":"Support Net Neutrality","doc_count":6218},{"key":"An Internet Citizen","doc_count":6209},{"key":"Pat M","doc_count":5929},{"key":"John Smith","doc_count":4050},{"key":"17-108","doc_count":3278},{"key":"Smith","doc_count":3177},{"key":"John Johnson","doc_count":2936}]},"authors_name":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":25,"sum_other_doc_count":2133,"buckets":[{"key":"Various","doc_count":38},{"key":"Wireline Competition Bureau","doc_count":20},{"key":"self","doc_count":16},{"key":"Francella Ochillo","doc_count":15},{"key":"N/A","doc_count":14},{"key":"Scott H. Angstreich","doc_count":13},{"key":"Matthew F. Wood","doc_count":11},{"key":"Carmen Scurato","doc_count":10},{"key":"Dave Kumar","doc_count":9},{"key":"n/a","doc_count":9}]},"text_data":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":4859,"sum_other_doc_count":9310650,"buckets":[{"key":"I strongly support net neutrality backed by Title 2 oversight of ISPs.","doc_count":240592},{"key":"Don't kill net neutrality. We deserve a free and open Internet with strong Title II rules. This will ensure that the flow of data is determined by the interests of Internet users","doc_count":225263},{"key":"Please save the internet from the corporations. Tom Wheeler was right. Let the new neutrality stand.","doc_count":109425},{"key":"make sure net neutrality does not dissapear. It is the only thing saving the internet at this moment. If it is removed many webservices will be at risk.","doc_count":109160},{"key":"Please Save Net Neutrality and Title ll rules. As a freelance translator I rely on internet spped to do my work and corporations would interfere with my searches if given the change. Do the right thing and keep the needed regulations. Thank you.","doc_count":108960},{"key":"Save net neutrality! I am worried that the protections that are in place will be weakened if we change the way they are enforced. I do not support losing any protections, and I do not trust big companies to look out for my best interests. That's YOUR JOB!","doc_count":108861},{"key":"We need net neutralityto continue. A free and open internet is the single greatest technology of our time, and control should not be at the mercy of corporations.","doc_count":108771},{"key":"Don't kill net neutrality. We deserve a free and open Internet - one where the flow of data is determined by the interests of Internet users","doc_count":96813},{"key":"The Title II order created a gaping gap in privacy protections by taking the best cop, the FTC, off the beat. That is reason enough to support Chairman Pai's proposal to restore Internet freedom. Restore privacy by repealing Net Neutrality.","doc_count":92886},{"key":"Title II is a Depression-era regulatory framework designed for a telephone monopoly that no longer exists. It was wrong to apply it to the Internet and the FCC should repeal it and go back to the free-market approach that worked so well.","doc_count":90458}]},"viewingstatus_description":{"doc_count_error_upper_bound":0,"sum_other_doc_count":0,"buckets":[{"key":"Unrestricted","doc_count":22638481},{"key":"Sunshine","doc_count":1343581},{"key":"Confidential","doc_count":7}]}}}